<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385115091808825739</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:29:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Fireballs and Meteorites - SOTT.NET</title><description>Watching the skies...</description><link>http://fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Laura Knight Jadczyk)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>69</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385115091808825739.post-5105788206620207389</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-28T05:21:01.130Z</atom:updated><title>October 2009</title><description>&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://mbl.is/mm/frettir/innlent/2009/10/05/loftsteinn_yfir_arborg/?ref=fpmestlesid" target="_blank"&gt;Video: Fireball lights up sky over Iceland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
mbl.is&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:43 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A police dash-cam catches a fireball lighting up the sky in the south of Iceland&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Translation of article:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The police in Selfoss caught these weird lights in the sky on tape
shortly after midnight last night. The officers were going east during
a routine highway patrol on Eyrarbakka-road when they noticed a
spectacular flare which to them seemed to be heading to the river
Ölfusá. Speculations are that this was a meteorite entering the
atmosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many saw the flare and notified the police, and the
flare was seen all around the south of Iceland and in Akranes. It is
believed impossible to have been an emergency flare.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sheriff in Selfoss says there has not been any aftermath
to his knowledge, and no unusal visitors have been seen that could
possibly have fallen from the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://mbl.is/player/mblplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="media_id=27472"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091002120412.htm"&gt;Quick Rebound From Marine Mass Extinction Event, New Findings Show&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Science Daily&lt;br /&gt;
Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:55 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Don Davis/NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27349/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27349/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Don Davis/NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;An
artist's rendering of the asteroid impact that took place 65 million
years ago and likely killed off nearly every large vertebrate species
on the planet, including, many think, the dinosaurs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
In
1980, Luis Alvarez and his collaborators stunned the world with their
discovery that an asteroid impact 65 million years ago probably killed
off the dinosaurs and much of the the world's living organisms. But
ever since, there has been an ongoing debate about how long it took for
life to return to the devastated planet and for ecosystems to bounce
back.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, researchers from MIT and their collaborators have found
that at least some forms of microscopic marine life - the so called
"primary producers," or photosynthetic organisms such as algae and
cyanobacteria in the ocean - recovered within about a century after the
mass extinction. Previous research had indicated the process might have
taken millions of years.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has taken so long to uncover the quick recovery because
previous studies looked mostly at fossils in the layers of sediment
from that period, and apparently the initial recovery was dominated by
tiny, soft-bodied organisms such as cyanobacteria, which do not have
shells or other hard body parts that leave fossil traces. The new
research looked instead for "chemical fossils" - traces of organic
molecules (compounds composed of mostly carbon and hydrogen) that can
reveal the presence of specific types of organisms, even though all
other parts of the organisms themselves are long gone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new research, published in the Oct. 2 issue of &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;,
was led by Julio Sepúlveda, an MIT postdoc who carried out part of the
work while still a graduate student at the University of Bremen,
Germany, and MIT Professor of Geobiology Roger Summons, among others.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team had two major advantages that helped to make the new
findings possible. One was a section of the well-known cliff face at
Stevns Klint, Denmark, that happens to have an unusually thick layer of
sediment from the period of the mass extinction - about 40 centimeters
thick, compared to the few cm thickness of the layers that Alvarez
originally studied from that period at Gubbio (Italy) and Stevns Klint
(Denmark). And team members tapped one of the most powerful Gas
Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometers (GC-MS) in the world, a device that
can measure minute quantities of different molecules in the rock. MIT's
advanced GC-MS is one of only a few such powerful instruments currently
available at U.S. universities.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When people look at microfossils in the sediments from the
period but are unable to detect the chemical biomarkers with the level
of sensitivity the MIT team was able to achieve, they "miss a big part
of the picture," Sepúlveda says. "Many of these microorganisms" that
were detected through molecular signatures "are at the base of the food
chain, but if you don't look with biochemical techniques you miss
them."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The analysis clarified the sequence of events after the big
impact. Immediately after the impact, certain areas of the ocean were
devoid of oxygen and hostile to most algae, but close to the continent,
microbial life was inhibited for only a relatively short period: in
probably less than 100 years, algal productivity showed the first signs
of recovery. In the open ocean, however, this recovery took much
longer: previous studies have estimated that the global ocean ecosystem
did not return to its former state until 1 to 3 million years following
the impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the rebound of primary producers, Sepúlveda says
"very soon after the impact, the food supply was not likely a
limitation" for other organisms, and yet "the whole ecology of the
system remained disrupted" and took much longer to recover.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The findings provide observational evidence supporting models
suggesting that global darkness after the impact was rather short.
"Primary productivity came back quickly, at least in the environment we
were studying," says Summons, referring to the near-shore environment
represented by the Danish sediments.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The atmosphere must have cleared up rapidly," he says.
"People will have to rethink the recovery of the ecosystems. It can't
be just the lack of food supply" that made it take so long to recover.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team hopes to be able to study other locations with
relatively thick deposits from the extinction aftermath, to determine
whether the quick recovery really was a widespread phenomenon after the
mass extinction.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These findings seem to rule out one theory about how the
global ecosystem responded to the impact, which held that for more than
a million years there was a "Strangelove ocean" - a reference to the
post-apocalyptic scenario in the movie &lt;em&gt;Dr. Strangelove&lt;/em&gt;  -  in which all the primary producers remained absent for a prolonged period, Summons says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to Sepúlveda and Summons, the work was carried out by Jens
Wendler of the Friedrich-Schiller University in Jena, Germany, and
Kai-Uwe Hinrichs of the University of Bremen. The work was funded by
the DFG, European Graduate College Europrox and the NASA Astrobiology
and Exobiology Programs.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journal reference:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Julio Sepúlveda, Jens E. Wendler, Roger E. Summons, and
Kai-Uwe Hinrichs. Rapid Resurgence of Marine Productivity After the
Cretaceous-Paleogene Mass Extinction. &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;, 2009; DOI: &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1176233"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/latinamerica/articles/2009/10/07/zadunaiskys_math_determined_halleys_comet_orbit/"&gt;Zadunaisky's Math Determined Halley's Comet Orbit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Associated Press / Boston.com&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:20 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Buenos Aires, Argentina - Pedro Elias Zadunaisky, an Argentine
astronomer and mathematician whose calculations helped determine the
orbit of Saturn's outermost moon, Phoebe, as well as Halley's Comet,
died Wednesday. He was 91.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zadunaisky was a pioneer in celestial mechanics, applying
mathematical models to determine how gravity and other forces alter the
orbits of other objects in the solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zadunaisky also was a Senior Astronomer at the Smithsonian
Astrophysical Observatory and in the 1960s researched the orbits of
celestial bodies at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, calculating the
orbits of the first U.S. Earth satellite, Explorer I, as well as other
satellites during the U.S. space race against Russia.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Argentine city of Rosario on Dec. 10, 1917,
Zadunaisky earned a civil engineering degree at the National University
of Rosario, then pursued applied mathematics and specialized in
celestial mechanics. He earned three Guggenheim fellowships for
research at Columbia University in 1957, Princeton University in 1958
and at the University of Texas at Austin in 1977. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zadunaisky left Argentina in 1966 along with many
other professors and scientists after a crackdown on university
protests against a military coup known as "the night of the long
clubs."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zadunaisky soon returned, and eventually taught at both the
University of Buenos Aires and the National University of La Plata. He
also directed astrodynamical investigations at Argentina's National
Commission on Space Activity.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2000, an asteroid discovered by a team of his former students was named 4617 Zadunaisky in his honor.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His research was published in more than 40 publications worldwide, including the text book &lt;em&gt;A Guide to Celestial Mechanics&lt;/em&gt;, edited by the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-maybe-didnt-kill-the-dinos"&gt;What (Maybe) Didn't Kill the Dinosaurs: Comets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
John Matson&lt;br /&gt;
Scientific American&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:01 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Bettmann Corbis" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27558/full/what_maybe_didnt_kill_the_dinos.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Comet" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27558/medium/what_maybe_didnt_kill_the_dinos.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Bettmann Corbis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Cometary
commotion: A new mechanism for how icy bodies get past Jupiter and
Saturn suggests that comet showers did not play a big role in Earth's
extinctions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A new model for comet production revises the theory of their origins&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chunks of ice and dust that make their home in the Oort cloud, far
beyond the orbit of Pluto, sometimes become dislodged and head into the
solar system as streaky comets. Some disruptions, caused by passing
stars and other interactions with the Milky Way galaxy, are severe
enough to send Oort comets into orbits that buzz or even collide with
Earth. New simulations have revealed a novel mechanism for their entry
into our part of the solar system, a method that also suggests that
comet showers may not have been strongly involved in major extinctions
on Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comet dynamics depend heavily on Jupiter and Saturn: their
huge gravitational fields tend to keep objects away from Earth. Comets
that manage to skirt Jupiter and Saturn, the conventional thinking
goes, had to have originated in the outer reaches of the Oort cloud,
where perturbations from outside the solar system can be felt most
strongly and are writ large across vast cometary orbits that take
hundreds of years to complete. Only during comet showers caused by
close stellar passages, the theory holds, have extreme gravitational
disruptions brought inner Oort cloud comets into the mix. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A computer simulation by Nathan Kaib and Thomas Quinn,
both at the University of Washington, have upended this thinking. They
have found that the comets that manage to cross the Jupiter-Saturn
barrier do in fact originate in large numbers in the inner Oort cloud,
even in the absence of a large disruption causing a comet shower.
Specifically, they found that the relatively nearby objects of the
inner Oort cloud can be kicked into the reaches of the outer cloud via
interactions with the massive planets. Those newly far-flung comets,
suddenly enjoying a longer orbit and greater gravitational
perturbations from interstellar space, can find their orbits so changed
that, by the time they pass through the planetary region again, they
slip past the gas giants. "They can basically hop over the
Jupiter-Saturn barrier," Kaib says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kaib and Quinn estimate that more than half of the comets we
observe streaking in from the Oort cloud reach our neighborhood via
this route, and other researchers agree the simulation appears valid.
"This mechanism, this dynamical path, as we call it, could work and
could be a significant contributor," says Paul Weissman, a senior
research scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new research presents a route for comet production "that
goes some way" toward resolving discrepancies between the standard
model and the observations, says Scott Tremaine, an astrophysicist at
the Institute for Advanced Study in Prince­ton, N.J. "One of the issues
is that [the conventional view of] the cometary formation process is so
inefficient; in order to produce the number of comets that we see,
you'd need a really massive protoplanetary disk, one that appears to be
incompatible with our best estimates from other sources," Tremaine
says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kaib and Quinn used their newfound mechanism, as well as the
number of observed comets, to estimate an upper limit on how much
material could be in the inner Oort cloud. They then produced a
statistical model of how many comets would have hit Earth in comet
showers in the past several hundred million years. Their conclusion:
large cometary showers were few and hence probably did not cause more
than one extinction event.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using cometary dynamics to unwind the extinction history on
Earth will likely meet with some controversy. Weissman notes that the
extinction implications of Kaib and Quinn's analysis would involve
comet showers, not comets in general, and that even a diminished
profile of showers does not rule out the role of comets in extinctions.
One big strike, rather than a shower of small ones, is all that's
needed to trigger extinctions, he points out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2009-151"&gt;NASA Refines Asteroid Apophis' Path Toward Earth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Jet Propulsion Laboratory&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:52 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© UH/IA " target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27703/full/apophis_20071114_browse.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27703/medium/apophis_20071114_browse.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© UH/IA &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Asteroid Apophis was discovered on June 19, 2004.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Pasadena,
California -- Using updated information, NASA scientists have
recalculated the path of a large asteroid. The refined path indicates a
significantly reduced likelihood of a hazardous encounter with Earth in
2036.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Apophis asteroid is approximately the size of
two-and-a-half football fields. The new data were documented by
near-Earth object scientists Steve Chesley and Paul Chodas at NASA's
Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. They will present their
updated findings at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society's
Division for Planetary Sciences in Puerto Rico on Oct. 8. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Apophis has been one of those celestial bodies that
has captured the public's interest since it was discovered in 2004,"
said Chesley. "Updated computational techniques and newly available
data indicate the probability of an Earth encounter on April 13, 2036,
for Apophis has dropped from one-in-45,000 to about four-in-a million."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A majority of the data that enabled the updated orbit of
Apophis came from observations Dave Tholen and collaborators at the
University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy in Manoa made. Tholen
pored over hundreds of previously unreleased images of the night sky
made with the University of Hawaii's 2.2-meter (88-inch) telescope,
located near the summit of Mauna Kea.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tholen made improved measurements of the asteroid's position
in the images, enabling him to provide Chesley and Chodas with new data
sets more precise than previous measures for Apophis. Measurements from
the Steward Observatory's 2.3 meter (90-inch) Bok telescope on Kitt
Peak in Arizona and the Arecibo Observatory on the island of Puerto
Rico also were used in Chesley's calculations.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The information provided a more accurate glimpse of Apophis'
orbit well into the latter part of this century. Among the findings is
another close encounter by the asteroid with Earth in 2068 with chance
of impact currently at approximately three-in-a-million. As with
earlier orbital estimates where Earth impacts in 2029 and 2036 could
not initially be ruled out due to the need for additional data, it is
expected that the 2068 encounter will diminish in probability as more
information about Apophis is acquired.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, Apophis was thought to have a 2.7 percent chance of
impacting Earth in 2029. Additional observations of the asteroid ruled
out any possibility of an impact in 2029. However, the asteroid is
expected to make a record-setting -- but harmless -- close approach to
Earth on Friday, April 13, 2029, when it comes no closer than 29,450
kilometers (18,300 miles) above Earth's surface.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The refined orbital determination further reinforces that
Apophis is an asteroid we can look to as an opportunity for exciting
science and not something that should be feared," said Don Yeomans,
manager of the Near-Earth Object Program Office at JPL. "The public can
follow along as we continue to study Apophis and other near-Earth
objects by visiting us on our AsteroidWatch Web site and by following
us on the @AsteroidWatch Twitter feed."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The science of predicting asteroid orbits is based on a
physical model of the solar system which includes the gravitational
influence of the sun, moon, other planets and the three largest
asteroids.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA detects and tracks asteroids and comets passing close to
Earth using both ground and space-based telescopes. The Near-Earth
Object Observations Program, commonly called "Spaceguard," discovers
these objects, characterizes a subset of them and plots their orbits to
determine if any could be potentially hazardous to our planet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JPL manages the Near-Earth Object Program Office for NASA's
Science Mission Directorate in Washington. JPL is a division of the
California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. Cornell University,
Ithaca, N.Y., operates the Arecibo Observatory under a cooperative
agreement with the National Science Foundation in Arlington, Va.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.koat.com/news/21277557/detail.html"&gt;Cosmic Object Caught On Camera&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
koat.com&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:15 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A New Mexico astronomer is hoping you can help solve a mystery.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He caught a spectacular fireball on video and he said you can help him track down what's left of it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Ashcraft caught a cosmic fireball on camera. It flashed through
the sky for about eight seconds just after 2 Friday morning. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Probably originating in the vicinity of Taos, and
then streaking across the sky to Wagon Mound or Springer area," said
Ashcraft.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ashcraft works in a lab the size of a small barn. He bought or
built most of the electronics himself, except for a special camera on
loan from Sandia Labs.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The camera looks like a parking lot surveillance camera except it's parking lot is the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Actually up to Denver, into Utah, into southwest Kansas, and northern Mexico," said Ashcraft.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The camera runs from dusk to dawn recording everything that
flashes through the heavens. It's synched to a radio telescope that
records the sound of the objects shredding the ionosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Maybe somebody recorded this on surveillance camera. So if
there's other videos, then we might be able to triangulate and see if
there's a meteorite that landed somewhere," said Ashcraft.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas says that this fireball was created by something about
the size of a filing cabinet, but he can spot something as small as
this bolt burning through the atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091013110050.htm"&gt;Asteroid is Actually a Protoplanet: Study of First High-resolution Images of Pallas Confirms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ScienceDaily&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:40 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Science/AAAS" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27731/full/091013110050_large.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Pallas" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27731/medium/091013110050_large.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Science/AAAS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Pallas's
largest crater-like feature seen in the digital model (left) and from
two perspectives: appearing face-on (upper right) and edge-on along the
limb (lower right).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Britney E. Schmidt, a UCLA
doctoral student in the department of Earth and space sciences, wasn't
sure what she'd glean from images of the asteroid Pallas taken by the
Hubble Space Telescope. But she hoped to settle at least one burning
question: Was Pallas, the second-largest asteroid, actually in that
gray area between an asteroid and a small planet?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The answer, she found, was yes. Pallas, like its sister asteroids Ceres and Vesta, was that rare thing: an intact protoplanet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was incredibly exciting to have this new perspective on an
object that is really interesting and hadn't been observed by Hubble at
high resolution," Schmidt said of the first high-resolution images of
Pallas, which is believed to have been intact since its formation, most
likely within a few million years of the birth of our solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We were trying to understand not only the object, but how the
solar system formed," Schmidt said. "We think of these large asteroids
not only as the building blocks of planets but as a chance to look at
planet formation frozen in time."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The research appears Oct. 9 in the journal &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"To have the chance to use Hubble at all, and to see those images come
back and understand automatically this could change what we think about
this object - that was incredibly exciting to me," Schmidt said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pallas, which is named for the Greek goddess Pallas Athena,
lies in the main asteroid belt between the orbits of Jupiter and Mars.
Schmidt likens it to the size of Arizona, her home state. The massive
body is unique, she said, partly because "its orbit is so much
different from other asteroids. It's highly inclined."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hubble had tried to snap pictures of the round-shaped body
before but came up short. So when the space telescope took images again
in September 2007, Schmidt and her colleagues had several goals.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We wanted to learn about Pallas itself - what its shape is
like, what its surface is like, does it have large impact craters, does
it have significant topography," she said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the Hubble images, Schmidt and her colleagues were able
to take new measurements of Pallas' size and shape. They were able to
see that its surface has areas of dark and light, indicating that the
water-rich body might have undergone an internal change in the same way
planets do.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pallas wasn't just a big rock made of hydrated silicate and ice, they found.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"That's what makes it more like a planet - the color variation
and the round shape are very important as far as understanding, is this
a dynamic object or has it been exactly the same since it's been
formed?" Schmidt said. "We think it's probably a dynamic object."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time, Schmidt and her colleagues also saw a
large impact site on Pallas. They were unable to determine if it was a
crater, but the depression did suggest something else important: that
it could have led to Pallas' small family of asteroids orbiting in
space.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's interesting, because there are very few large, intact
asteroids left," Schmidt said. "There were probably many more. Most
have been broken up completely. It's an interesting chance to almost
look into the object, at the layer underneath. It's helping to unravel
one of the big questions that we have about Pallas, why does it have
this family?"
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schmidt's co-authors include Peter C. Thomas, a senior
researcher at Cornell University; James Bauer, a researcher with the
Jet Propulsion Laboratory; J.Y. Li, a postdoctoral student at the
University of Maryland; Schmidt's Ph.D. adviser, UCLA professor of
geophysics and space physics Christopher T. Russell; Andrew Rivkin, a
researcher at Johns Hopkins University; Joel William Parker, a
researcher at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado;
Lucy McFadden, a faculty member at the University of Maryland; S. Alan
Stern of the Southwest Research Institute; Max Mutchler, a researcher
at the Space Telescope Sciences Institute; and Chris Radcliffe, a
digital artist in Santa Monica.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"When people think of asteroids, they think of 'Star Wars' or
of tiny little rocks floating through space," Schmidt said. "But some
of these have been really physically dynamic. Around 5 million years
after the formation of the solar system, Pallas was probably doing
something kind of interesting."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17970-asteroid-isnt-just-a-dry-heap-of-rubble.html"&gt;Asteroid isn't just a dry heap of rubble&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Rachel Courtland&lt;br /&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:29 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA/ESA/J. Parker/SWRI/P. Thomas/Cornell U/L. McFadden/University of Maryland/M. Mutchler/Z. Levay/STScI" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27739/full/dn17970_1_300.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27739/medium/dn17970_1_300.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA/ESA/J. Parker/SWRI/P. Thomas/Cornell U/L. McFadden/University of Maryland/M. Mutchler/Z. Levay/STScI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;The
largest asteroid, Ceres (shown), appears to contain a lot of water ice
beneath its surface. Now ice has been detected on the surface of the
asteroid 24 Themis, which lies about three times as far from the sun as
Earth does.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Two independent teams have found what may
be the first direct evidence of water ice on the surface of an
asteroid. The discovery lends support to the idea that asteroids could
have helped deliver water to the early Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asteroids are generally considered to be rocky, and comets
icy. That's because ice in the early solar system is thought to have
formed beyond a "snow line" lying somewhere between Mars and Jupiter.
Asteroids forming beyond that boundary could contain ice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it is not clear how common ice might be in the main
asteroid belt, because sunlight is expected to quickly vaporise ice on
the surfaces of airless bodies that fly closer to the sun than Jupiter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, however, Andrew Rivkin of Johns Hopkins University in
Laurel, Maryland, and Joshua Emery of the SETI Institute in Mountain
View, California, found hints that the asteroid 24 Themis, which sits
in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, could have water
ice on its surface. The team found the water signal by measuring the
spectrum of infrared light radiated by the object.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now a second team has found the water ice signature using the same telescope, NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new observations suggest water ice, mixed with organic
molecules, is "widespread on the surface of the asteroid", Humberto
Campins of the University of Central Florida in Orlando reported at a
meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Division of Planetary
Sciences in Fajardo, Puerto Rico, last week. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Icy parent&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is surprising, since the asteroid's distance from the sun means it
should lose about 1 metre of ice each year. "This ice is unstable, and
therefore we need a process to explain why there is ice on the surface
now," Campins said at the meeting.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One possiblity is that an icy object might have collided with
24 Themis, leaving behind a layer of ice. Alternatively, the ice could
have been part of the asteroid's parent body, which is thought to have
broken up about 2.5 billion years ago, producing a family of asteroids
with orbits similar to that of 24 Themis.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that case, the ice seen on the surface now would once have
been buried beneath dust and rock that insulated it from the sun's heat
and prevented it from escaping into space. Impacts could then have
churned the surface to expose the ice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Watery hints&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until now, the possibility of present-day water ice on
asteroids has only been hinted at. The density of the mammoth main-belt
asteroid Ceres suggests it contains a large amount of water ice, but no
clear-cut sign of ice has been found on its surface.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This Themis result is really nice because it's been confirmed
by two independent groups," says Henry Hsieh of Queen's University
Belfast in the UK, though he notes that the spectral evidence for ice
may not be entirely water-tight.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's a messy region [of the spectrum] that's hard to
observe," says Clark Chapman of Southwest Research Institute in
Boulder, Colorado. "In some sense, it's a matter of judgment whether
it's a hint of water ice or an almost certain detection or somewhere in
between."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Chapman says, he would not be surprised to see water
ice on asteroids, adding that the distinction between comets,
traditionally considered to be icy, and asteroids, which have been
largely thought of as rocky, is becoming increasingly blurred.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Comet tails&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, Hsieh and others have discovered a handful of
main-belt asteroids with comet-like tails that could be created by
sublimating ice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These so-called "main-belt comets" are too distant and faint
for astronomers to scan their spectra for signs of water ice. Two of
the four detected so far are part of the same family of asteroids as 24
Themis, which is the family's largest member.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"What is most likely the case is that the parent body [of this
family] was water-ice-rich, was broken up, and now the surface of its
largest fragment, Themis, has been impact-excavated, revealing the ice
that was once deep in a larger object," says Britney Schmidt of UCLA,
who was not affiliated with Campins's study. "It is exciting to finally
get a glimpse inside a water-rich body."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Mismatched isotopes&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Jewitt of UCLA, co-discoverer of the first main-belt
comets, agrees. "These objects may hold ice and preserve a record of
conditions at formation between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter," he
told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The detection could also go a long way towards explaining how the Earth
got its water. Soon after the solar system's formation, the sun's heat
is thought to have broken apart most water molecules that lay close to
the sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comets, which formed far from the sun, have been proposed as
an alternate way of delivering water to the Earth, but the relative
amounts of different isotopes of hydrogen in the water on comets do not
match up with Earth's. "If there was water in the asteroids, it could
be enough to fill the oceans," Hsieh says.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091012/full/news.2009.997.html?s=news_rss"&gt;North America Comet Theory Questioned&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Rex Dalton&lt;br /&gt;
Nature News&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:00 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Vance Holliday" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27772/full/Dryas2_news_2009_997.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="San Jon site" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27772/medium/Dryas2_news_2009_997.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Vance Holliday&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Sediments
at the San Jon site, in eastern New Mexico, contained very low
abundances of magnetic spherules said to be evidence of an impact.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;No evidence of an extraterrestrial impact 13,000 years ago, studies say.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An independent study has cast more doubt on a controversial theory that
a comet exploded over icy North America nearly 13,000 years ago, wiping
out the Clovis people and many of the continent's large animals.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archaeologists have examined sediments at seven Clovis-age
sites across the United States, and did not find enough magnetic cosmic
debris to confirm that an extraterrestrial impact happened at that
time, says the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907857106"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)&lt;/em&gt;. It is the latest of several studies unable to support aspects of the impact hypothesis.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, a team led by Californian researchers announced a &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706977104"&gt;theory&lt;/a&gt;
that a comet or asteroid had exploded over the North American ice
sheet, creating widespread fire and an atmospheric soot burst followed
by a cooling period known as the Younger Dryas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometime after this, the Clovis people, sophisticated large-animal
hunters known for their spear points, mysteriously disappeared; the
team linked their vanishing to the environmental effects of the
proposed impact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Key evidence came in the form of magnetic
microspherules discovered in sediments at 25 locations, including eight
Clovis-age sites. Richard Firestone, of Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory in California, and his colleagues argued that the
microspherules were remnants of cosmic debris from an explosion.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But in more than 18 months of sedimentary analysis, a team led
by Todd Surovell, an archaeologist at the University of Wyoming in
Laramie, was &lt;strong&gt;unable to detect microspherule peaks&lt;/strong&gt;. Two of the seven sites the group studied were places where Firestone's team identified spherule peaks.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I spent hundreds of hours at the microscope examining sediment
samples," says Surovell, "and I didn't find any physical evidence to
support their theory."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Standing firm&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other team isn't backing down. "Their study doesn't negate
our hypothesis," says James Kennett, a palaeoceanographer at the
University of California at Santa Barbara and one of Firestone's
co-authors. Another co-author, avocational geophysicist Allen West of
Prescott, Arizona, says that Surovell's group didn't use the correct
technique to extract, identify and quantify the microspherules.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several other groups have been unable to support important aspects of the comet theory.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a &lt;em&gt;PNAS&lt;/em&gt; article &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808212106"&gt;published&lt;/a&gt;
in February, Jennifer Marlon, a doctoral geography student at the
University of Oregon in Eugene, and her colleagues found no systematic
burning of biomass - as would have occurred if continent-wide fires had
happened - at the time of the Younger Dryas in pollen and charcoal
records at 35 sites. And at the Ecological Society of America meeting
in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in August, Jacquelyn Gill, a palaeoecology
doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, &lt;strong&gt;reported finding no evidence of massive burning in sediment cores&lt;/strong&gt; taken from lake beds in Ohio and Indiana.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kennett, however, calls these studies &lt;strong&gt;"flawed"&lt;/strong&gt;.
In August, his team published a report saying they had found
nanometre-sized diamonds, purportedly created during an impact, and
soot in sediments dated to the Younger Dryas on Santa Rosa Island, off
the coast of California.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More studies of the theory  -  both critical and supportive  -  are in the publishing pipelines at other journals.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surovell's co-author Vance Holliday, an archaeologist at the
University of Arizona in Tucson, and his colleagues have an article in
press at &lt;em&gt;Current Anthropology&lt;/em&gt;
that says the archaeological and geochronological records don't support
a collapse of Clovis people at the time of the purported impact. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-comment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;For a more in-depth view, read: &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/134637-The-Younger-Dryas-Impact-Event-and-the-Cycles-of-Cosmic-Catastrophes-Climate-Scientists-Awakening"&gt;The Younger Dryas Impact Event and the Cycles of Cosmic Catastrophes - Climate Scientists Awakening&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.physorg.com/wire-news/16898374/what-hit-earth-in-1908-with-the-force-of-3000-atomic-bombs.html"&gt;What Hit Earth in 1908 with the Force of 3,000 Atomic Bombs?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
PhysOrg&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Vladimir Rubtsov" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27780/full/107kg38.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="The Tunguska Mystery" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27780/pod/107kg38.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Vladimir Rubtsov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;The Tunguska Mystery&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
There
have been numerous theories proposed about what struck the taiga in
central Siberia, causing millions of trees to topple over and many
still-standing trees to lose all their branches. Many expeditions have
looked for traces of what hit Earth and have not found much. There is
no telltale meteor crater, and no clear evidence of a nuclear blast. In
fact, at the epicenter, the trees were found to be still standing.
Whatever hit Earth did not reach the ground. It exploded in the air
above the ground.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In &lt;em&gt;The Tunguska Mystery&lt;/em&gt; by Vladimir Rubtsov, the
efforts put forth by generations of Russian scientists, technicians,
and others are documented. What did they find? Was it a meteorite, as
had first been thought? Was it an asteroid? Was it a comet? Some
support the idea that this was not a "natural" event at all but one
caused by the explosion of an alien spaceship trying to land on Earth.
Is there any evidence for this? How did the Russian scientific and
world community react to this theory?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mystery has been very difficult to solve, but it is
important - perhaps even urgent - to solve it. We live in a very
violent universe, and we are extremely vulnerable to its vagaries. How
can we prevent another "Tunguska" if we don't even know what it was?
And next time, the event might not occur in a remote, barely inhabited
region of Earth. It may take many thousands of lives and destroy whole
cities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vladimir Rubtsov was born in 1948 in Kharkov, Ukraine.
He received his Ph.D. degree in the Philosophy of Science from the
Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, having
defended in 1980 the doctoral thesis: "Philosophical and Methodological
Aspects of the Problem of Extraterrestrial Civilizations," the first of
its kind in the former USSR. Dr. Rubtsov has authored two monographs
and some 120 scientific and popular science articles in the Soviet,
post-Soviet and international press.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/health/scientists-may-have-found-first-direct-evidence-of-water-ice-on-asteroids-surface_100259927.html"&gt;Scientists May Have Found First Direct Evidence of Water Ice on Asteroid's Surface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thaindian News&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:32 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Two independent scientific teams have found what may be the first
direct evidence of water ice on the surface of an asteroid, a discovery
that lends support to the idea that asteroids could have helped deliver
water to the early Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asteroids are generally considered to be rocky, and comets
icy. That's because ice in the early solar system is thought to have
formed beyond a "snow line" lying somewhere between Mars and Jupiter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asteroids forming beyond that boundary could contain ice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, it is not clear how common ice might be in the main
asteroid belt, because sunlight is expected to quickly vaporise ice on
the surfaces of airless bodies that fly closer to the sun than Jupiter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, however, Andrew Rivkin of Johns Hopkins University in
Laurel, Maryland, and Joshua Emery of the SETI Institute in Mountain
View, California, found hints that the asteroid 24 Themis, which sits
in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, could have water
ice on its surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team found the water signal by measuring the spectrum of infrared light radiated by the object.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, according to a report in &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;, a second team has found the water ice signature using the same telescope, NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new observations suggest water ice, mixed with organic molecules,
is "widespread on the surface of the asteroid," said Humberto Campins
of the University of Central Florida in Orlando.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is surprising, since the asteroid's distance from the sun means it should lose about 1 metre of ice each year.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This ice is unstable, and therefore we need a process to explain why there is ice on the surface now," said Campins.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One possibility is that an icy object might have collided with 24 Themis, leaving behind a layer of ice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, the ice could have been part of the asteroid's
parent body, which is thought to have broken up about 2.5 billion years
ago, producing a family of asteroids with orbits similar to that of 24
Themis.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"What is most likely the case is that the parent body (of this
family) was water-ice-rich, was broken up, and now the surface of its
largest fragment, Themis, has been impact-excavated, revealing the ice
that was once deep in a larger object," said Britney Schmidt of UCLA.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It is exciting to finally get a glimpse inside a water-rich body," she added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/10/arctichovercraft/all/1"&gt;Hunting Arctic Asteroid Impact With Hovercraft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Alexis Madrigal&lt;br /&gt;
Wired&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:43 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Two polar scientists hot on the trail of an arctic mystery have a new
tool for exploration: a hovercraft, specially outfitted for week-long
trips over the ice with scientific instruments and solar panels.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© Hall and Kristofferson" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27781/full/hc_yermak_crop1.png"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Hovercraft" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27781/medium/hc_yermak_crop1.png" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Hall and Kristofferson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;The hovercraft&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Their
quarry is a nearly 22,000 square-mile patch of disturbed Arctic sea
floor that could be evidence of a massive asteroid strike. John Hall, a
now-retired geoscientist, discovered the anomaly during his late-'60s
graduate work aboard Fletcher's Ice Island, a huge berg U.S. scientists
inhabited for several decades.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since then, no scientific vessel has been back over the area
to collect more data. The massive icebreakers that have crunched
through the Arctic since the 1990s can't reach the spot, said Yngve
Kristofferson, a scientist and explorer at the University of Bergen in
Norway.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kristofferson became intrigued with Hall's data and in 2004,
the two of them met in Bergen to talk Arctic science from eight in the
morning to 10 in the evening. At the end of their time together, they
came to a decision: They needed a hovercraft. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Luckily, Hall is a partial heir to the fortune his
grandfather made as head of the American Chicle Company, the trust that
ran the American bubble gum game early in the 20th century, so he was
able to buy the vehicle with private funds. A customized Griffon
Hovercraft 2000TD, it is now going through the paces, hitting the
Arctic from its home at Longyearbyen for the first time in 2008, and
hoping to reach its full potential next spring.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hall delivered a speech detailing the craft's capabilities and
mission at Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory on
Oct. 6.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The neat thing with a hovercraft is that you drive with the
same ease over 10 centimeter-thick ice as you do with five meter thick
ice," Kristofferson told Wired.com.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite their futuristic reputation, hovercraft have been
commercially available for decades. The concept is actually quite
simple. A big engine or turbine pumps air into a rubber skirt that
allows the vehicle to tread lightly on whatever it's touching. The R/H
Sabvabaa, for example, weighs six tons but exerts no more pressure on
any patch of ice than a seagull standing on one leg would by standing
on it. The rest of the power from the engine is devoted to propulsion,
allowing the craft to skip along at speeds up to 50 miles per hour.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the strange terrain of the Arctic, it works perfectly, Hall and Kristofferson wrote in an article in the journal &lt;em&gt;The Leading Edge&lt;/em&gt; in August.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The craft has proved to be useful for a variety of scientific
tasks," they wrote. "It appears more efficient than any other platform
for ice-thickness measurements and oceanographic work."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their hovercraft push comes as money has flooded into Arctic
research. With Arctic ice melting, the nations adjacent to the ocean
are rushing to stake their claims not just on the water, but on the oil
and natural gas that lie under the sea floor, leading to calls to
establish a National Park to protect the area.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most fascinating target for the hovercraft is the area of
very thick ice closer to Ellesmere Island and northern Greenland. Not
even nuclear-powered icebreakers have ventured into the region. It was
just Hall's good fortune to have been aboard the floating ice island
doing research when it passed near this apparent sea floor anomaly. The
duo, along with several other colleagues, described the discovery in a
2008 paper in the &lt;em&gt;Norwegian Journal of Geology&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Hall and Kristofferson" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27782/full/t3.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Fletcher’s Ice Island Camp" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27782/pod/t3.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Hall and Kristofferson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Fletcher’s Ice Island Camp&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
"The
upper couple hundred meters of sediment at the bottom of the Arctic
Ocean is just like a carpet that is draped over the topography except
for these areas where 150 meters are just blown away and the seabed is
severely deformed," Kristofferson said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To Kristofferson and Hall, the evidence suggests that a
pressure wave caused by a pieces of a large asteroid crashing into the
Arctic Ocean created these strange features.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Our working hypothesis is that the spectrum and scale of the
observed disturbances are best explained as the effect of a shock wave
generated by the impact of an extraterrestrial object," they wrote.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the hypothesis remains just that without more data. The
hovercraft works well, but with its on-board fuel, its range is limited
to around 500 miles. For that reason, the scientists imagine they'll
use a larger vessel as a base of operations.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"What we really want to do is go along with an icebreaker into
the Arctic. You can greatly enhance the scientific output if you have a
hovercraft. If you have more of them, even better," Kristofferson said.
"We can go out and do our own science and be away for many days. If the
icebreaker gets stuck, we're not stuck."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, both Hall and Kristofferson know they face an uphill
battle to get other scientists to take both the hovercraft and asteroid
impact ideas seriously.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The task is to figure out the real message in the data - the
dream challenge for any scientist," Kristofferson told the Lamont
Doherty alumni magazine earlier this year. "So far, we have mostly met
shaking heads, which just makes it more fun."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/10/meteorite_explodes_over_north.php"&gt;Meteor explodes over Groningen, Netherlands: Fireball seen from Belgium and Germany&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Dutch News&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:51 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© NU.nl/Robert Mikaelyan" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27812/full/m1czwhea832t.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27812/medium/m1czwhea832t.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NU.nl/Robert Mikaelyan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Hundreds of people report seeing a spectacular fireball or meteorite over the Netherlands in Tuesday's clear evening skies.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The police emergency number, Dutch coastguard and KNMI weather bureau
report dozens of phone calls about the meteorite, which was seen in
Germany and Belgium.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'I was standing in front of my window when there was a bright
flash of light and a white fireball in the sky fell apart into three
smaller ones,' eyewitness Erik Alberts from Zuidbroek in Groningen
province told Nos tv. 'Like fireworks. A few seconds later, perhaps
half a minute, there was a low rumble and the windows shook.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27795/full/11431206.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27795/medium/11431206.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27797/full/11431208.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27797/medium/11431208.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27796/full/11431207.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27796/medium/11431207.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27798/full/11431209.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27798/medium/11431209.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27799/full/11431210.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27799/medium/11431210.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27800/full/11431214.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27800/medium/11431214.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-footer"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.wellandtribune.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2047719"&gt;Astronomers digging for meteors in Grimsby, Western Ontario&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Peter Downs&lt;br /&gt;
The Tribune / Sun Media&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:02 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© University of Western Ontario" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27499/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27499/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© University of Western Ontario&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;A
composite photograph of the meteor that streaked across southern
Ontario Sept. 25. It is believed meteorites landed in the Grimsby area.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Space
rocks formed when the solar system was created billions of years ago
are believed to have fallen to Earth near Grimsby in a fiery light show
two weeks ago.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomers will be digging through farmers' fields Thursday
and Friday on the hunt for hunks of a meteor that blazed across the
skies of southern Ontario Sept. 25 shortly after 9 p.m.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The beachball-sized meteor was first picked up by cameras
operated by the University of Western Ontario's physics and astronomy
department 100 kilometres above Guelph as the fireball streaked
southeastward at a speed of about 75,000 km/h.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomers at the university have traced the meteor's path
and believe chunks of it may have landed above the escarpment within a
10-km radius of Grimsby.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We're pretty certain something came down," said Phil
McCausland, a postdoctoral fellow with the university's astronomy
department. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's hard to put an X on the map and say, 'There,'
because what happens is at the end of the fireball path the lights go
out. There's no camera record of that."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's likely small pieces of the meteor - anywhere between the
size of a golf ball or a fist - made it through the atmosphere and hit
the ground, he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It could be dozens, it could be one or two. It's hard to say,
but if it's one or two, they will be on the largish size - probably
more than a kilogram."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers are keen to find any of the meteorites because
it's extremely rare to have their fall to Earth documented so well with
photo evidence.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on all of the information already known about the rocks,
it's possible for astronomers to determine which orbit they came from
and learn more about the early history of the solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"There's only a handful, perhaps a dozen, meteorites that have this kind of orbital information," McCausland said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural area where the meteorites are believed to have landed is largely farmland with some forest.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCausland has already spent several days over the past week searching for the rocks and interviewing landowners in the area.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was expected to be back on the hunt again Thursday with other researchers.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Even though the (cameras) we have narrows it down quite
nicely, it's still a large area to search. We're still talking about 12
to 16 kilometres," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doug Welch, an astrophysicist at McMaster University, will be joining the search.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welch monitors one of Western's meteor-seeking sky cameras at the Hamilton university.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fireball that torched across the sky two weeks ago practically went directly overhead of the Hamilton camera.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's really spectacular. ... I've seen them live, but&lt;strong&gt; it's very rare for them to be this bright," he said.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recovering meteorites that may have fallen gives researchers a
rare opportunity to learn more about the formation of the solar system,
he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"These are free samples from elsewhere in the solar system
delivered to your door. We have sample-return missions that cost
hundreds of millions of dollars."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meteorologist and Grimsby resident Kerry-Ann Lecky Hepburn spends much of her spare time photographing the stars and planets.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the night the fireball streaked towards Grimsby, she didn't
have her camera trained on the sky. She was watching TV with her
meteorologist husband in their home atop the escarpment.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We saw a bright flash and thought, 'How can it be a thunderstorm. There shouldn't be any storms around.'"
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A quick check online the following morning confirmed for Lecky Hepburn the bright light was a meteor.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It would have been nice to see something other than just the bright flash," she said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers are calling for anyone who has found pieces of
meteorite to contact them, as well as people in the area who witnessed
the fireball.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meteorites are typically dark, smooth on the surface, heavier
than rocks of a similar size and able to attract magnets because of the
metals they contain.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under Canadian law, meteorites become the property of whoever owns the property where they are recovered.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photos and video footage of the meteor can be found &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/research/fireball/events/25sept2009/"&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2127299"&gt;Canada, Ontario:  Grimsby meteorite found&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Standard&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:00 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
The Grimsby space rock has been found.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A fragment of meteorite the size of a golf ball smashed in the
windshield of a Grimsby family's sport utility vehicle on Sept. 25,
according to a media release from the University of Western Ontario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomers released a video Oct. 7 of a blinding
meteor streaking across the skies of Southern Ontario three weeks ago,
estimating pieces may have landed in Grimsby or West Lincoln.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meteorite hunters have been scouring the area ever since.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A press conference to discuss the find is scheduled for Friday morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S1188311.shtml?cat=500"&gt;US: Meteorite streaks across New Mexico sky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Gadi Schwartz and Matthew Kappus&lt;br /&gt;
KOB.com&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:20 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Scientists think a fireball that flew over New Mexico may have been close enough to actually hit the ground.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Santa Fe astronomer was able to catch the fiery streak on video.
Thomas Ashcraft says the fireball didn't disintegrate when it hit the
atmosphere. It may have landed somewhere near Taos.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="330" id="cs_player" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;amp;sat_offset=-70&amp;amp;pl_id=13637&amp;amp;show_logo=0&amp;amp;wpid=1295&amp;amp;hue=224&amp;amp;page_count=4&amp;amp;tags=default&amp;amp;windows=1&amp;amp;show_title=0&amp;amp;va_id=1137069&amp;amp;lrid=4014cffc&amp;amp;brt_offset=20&amp;amp;auto_start=0&amp;amp;auto_next=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="330" width="425"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/center&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"If we can get other camera angles, than we can put all the positions
together and possibly hunt for an important--scientifically
important--meteorite," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The event was also captured by cameras at Sandia National
Labs. Scientists estimate the meteor was about the size of a basketball
all the way up to that of a small car.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists at Sandia think it disintegrated over Chaco Canyon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091015102246.htm"&gt;Giant Impact Near India - Not Mexico - May Have Doomed Dinosaurs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ScienceDaily&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:00 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A mysterious basin off the coast of India could be the largest,
multi-ringed impact crater the world has ever seen. And if a new study
is right, it may have been responsible for killing the dinosaurs off 65
million years ago.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© Geological Society Of America" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27820/full/091015102246_large.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Mumbai Offshore Basin" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27820/medium/091015102246_large.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Geological Society Of America&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Three-dimensional
reconstruction of the submerged Shiva crater (~500 km diameter) at the
Mumbai Offshore Basin, western shelf of India from different
cross-sectional and geophysical data.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Sankar
Chatterjee of Texas Tech University and a team of researchers took a
close look at the massive Shiva basin, a submerged depression west of
India that is intensely mined for its oil and gas resources. Some
complex craters are among the most productive hydrocarbon sites on the
planet. Chatterjee will present his research at this month's Annual
Meeting of the Geological Society of America in Portland, Oregon.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"If we are right, this is the largest crater known on our
planet," Chatterjee said. "A bolide of this size, perhaps 40 kilometers
(25 miles) in diameter creates its own tectonics."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the object that struck the Yucatan Peninsula, and
is commonly thought to have killed the dinosaurs was between 8 and 10
kilometers (5 and 6.2 miles) wide. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to imagine such a cataclysm. But if the team
is right, the Shiva impact vaporized Earth's crust at the point of
collision, leaving nothing but ultra-hot mantle material to well up in
its place. It is likely that the impact enhanced the nearby Deccan
Traps volcanic eruptions that covered much of western India. What's
more, the impact broke the Seychelles islands off of the Indian
tectonic plate, and sent them drifting toward Africa.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The geological evidence is dramatic. Shiva's outer rim forms a
rough, faulted ring some 500 kilometers in diameter, encircling the
central peak, known as the Bombay High, which would be 3 miles tall
from the ocean floor (about the height of Mount McKinley). Most of the
crater lies submerged on India's continental shelf, but where it does
come ashore it is marked by tall cliffs, active faults and hot springs.
The impact appears to have sheared or destroyed much of the
30-mile-thick granite layer in the western coast of India.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team hopes to go India later this year to examine rocks
drill from the center of the putative crater for clues that would prove
the strange basin was formed by a gigantic impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Rocks from the bottom of the crater will tell us the telltale
sign of the impact event from shattered and melted target rocks. And we
want to see if there are breccias, shocked quartz, and an iridium
anomaly," Chatterjee said. Asteroids are rich in iridium, and such
anomalies are thought of as the fingerprint of an impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091012-opportunity-meteorite.html"&gt;Mars Rover Spots Another Meteorite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Space.com&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:10 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
NASA's intrepid Mars rover Opportunity has found yet another meteorite on the surface of the red planet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity stumbled upon this new meteorite, dubbed "Shelter Island,"
less than three weeks after driving away from a larger meteorite that
the rover examined for six weeks.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rover began its approach to the meteorite with a 92-foot
(28-meter) backwards drive on Oct. 1, the rover's 2,022nd day on Mars.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity and its twin rover Spirit - which is currently
embedded in a soft spot of soil called Troy - have been on the Martian
surface for more than five years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shelter Island is a pitted rock is about 18.5 inches
(47 cm) long. The meteorite was first detected in images taken two
Martian days earlier. (A Martian day is 24 hours and 40 minutes long.)
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two Martian days after its backward drive, Opportunity turned
around to face the meteorite. In the days that followed, it made a
final 3.3-foot (1-meter) move to put the rock within reach of the rover
robotic arm . Mission managers are now planning to use the arm to
contact the meteorite and make measurements.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity has driven about 2,300 feet (700 meters) since it
finished studying the meteorite called "Block Island" on Sept. 11,
2009.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Block Island weighs at least half a ton, is composed of iron
and nickel, and is likely too large to have plunged through the current
thin atmosphere of Mars without being obliterated upon impact,
scientists say.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both meteorites have been found during Opportunity's trek to its next target, Endeavour Crater.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opportunity also found a third meteorite, Heat Shield Rock, in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://thespec.com/videogallery/649219"&gt;Video: Grimsby, Ontario meteor 25 September&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
TheSpec.com&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:41 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;embed width="592" height="353" flashvars="file=http://media.hamiltonspectator.topscms.com/video/5f/3d/089a1d6448f68741165c5d47c2a2.flv&amp;amp;autostart=false" allowfullscreen="false" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" src="http://www.sott.net/signs/player.swf"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;You can read a report of this sighting &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/194434-Astronomers-digging-for-meteors-in-Grimsby-Western-Ontario"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1220621/Red-hot-piece-space-junk-crashes-pensioners-roof.html"&gt;UK: Red-hot piece of "space junk" crashes through pensioner's roof&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Daily Mail&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:43 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Mail News and Media LTD" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27850/full/article_1220621_06D58DDE000005D.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27850/medium/article_1220621_06D58DDE000005D.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Mail News and Media LTD&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Experts believe the 4lb dark grey object had been orbiting Earth for at least a decade&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Pensioner
Peter Welton was amazed when a piece of red-hot debris crashed through
his roof in July. Now experts have confirmed the object had travelled
hundreds of miles from outer space.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 75-year-old had been in his bedroom when he heard a smash
and found the football-sized lump of extra terrestrial debris in the
loft of his home in Hull.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The great-grandfather said: 'It was a hell of a shock. If it
had landed in the street and hit anybody it would have killed them.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As it was too hot to handle he brought it downstairs using oven gloves.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4lb dark grey object was removed by Humberside Police before being taken away by the Ministry of Defence for investigation.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Welton and wife Mair, 62, then received a phone call from the RAF, who said the metal mass was &lt;span class="BoldRed"&gt;most likely&lt;/span&gt; to be space junk. &lt;strong&gt;This could mean anything from part of a spacecraft to a piece of abandoned satellite.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="StoryComment"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;And how about a meteorite? After all, considering the increasing frequency of 'falling rocks' &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com/"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;, they are past due to be incorporated into daily weather forecasts. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RAF spokesman Squadron Leader Jeff Brock confirmed the finding, which
was the first the RAF's Defence Flying Complaints Investigation Team
had encountered.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Mail News and Media LTD" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27851/full/article_1220621_06D58DE8000005D.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27851/pod/article_1220621_06D58DE8000005D.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Mail News and Media LTD&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Peter Welton, 76, was in his home is Hull when the space debris slammed into his loft&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
He
said: 'Following consultations with the European Space Agency and Nasa,
we are confident the object is more than likely space debris which was
orbiting in excess of a decade.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'This is the first bit of space debris that we have got our
hands on - we have never until this occasion had anything relating to
it at all.'
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DFCIT, based in Henlow, in Bedfordshire, investigates
complaints related to military flying. Experts initially thought the
object may have come from an aircraft.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, its size and appearance was found to be 'entirely
consistent' with space junk, and its heavy mass meant it was more
likely to have been in a state of decaying orbit for a decade or more.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia (then the Soviet Union) put the first object into space
just 51 years ago - Sputnik One. Since then we have created a swarm of
perhaps tens of millions of items of space junk. The debris ranges in
size from paint flecks to defunct satellites.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest piece of space junk still circling is the Vanguard
1 communications satellite that was launched by the U.S in 1958, but
stopped working in 1964.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most hug close to the surface, 200-300 miles up in
low-earth-orbit, where they are a hazard to telescopes and the
astronauts on the International Space Station.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Mail News and Media LTD" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27852/full/article_1220621_06D5D79D000005D.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27852/pod/article_1220621_06D5D79D000005D.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Mail News and Media LTD&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;The 4lb piece of debris fell to Earth and landed in West Hull&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Most
debris will eventually burn up in the atmosphere, but larger objects
can reach the ground intact. Most have come down over the Pacific Ocean
or sparsely populated areas.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has only been one recorded incident of a person being
hit by human-made space debris. In 1997, Lottie Williams from Oklahoma
was hit in the shoulder by a 5.1" piece of blackened metal. It was
later confirmed to be part of the a rocket fuel tank launched the year
before. Luckily she was not injured.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite narrowly escaping being hit, Mrs Mair said she was excited to hear the experts' findings.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'I think it's wonderful,' she said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Mail's online video report on the event&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;embed width="470" height="352" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="cfg=id%3Ditn%26apiparams=e144bc58d186d3b82c6fa667ce875b74%26searchtype=itn.co.uk%26skinver=3%26open_sting=MAIL2_ONLINE_OPEN_KEEP%26end_sting=MAIL2_ONLINE_END_KEEP%26endimage=http://itn.co.uk/images/mail2_end.jpg%26endlink=http://itn.co.uk/%26partner=itnmail%26sourceSite=itnmail.blinkx.com&amp;amp;m_bAutoplay=false" src="http://itn.blinkx.com/p2"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thespec.com/article/654511" target="_blank"&gt;Canada, Ontario: Small meteorite broke windshield of SUV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mark McNeil&lt;br /&gt;
The Hamilton Spectator&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:36 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Scientists say a golf ball-sized rock that smashed through the
windshield of an SUV is a meteorite, possibly from a spectacular
fireball that streaked across the sky above Hamilton three weeks ago.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
University of Western Ontario researchers confirmed the rock was a meteorite. It will be unveiled today at a media conference.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fireball was captured on video Sept. 25 by a network of
cameras administered by Western that regularly watch the skies at
night. One of the cameras is located at McMaster University. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past two weeks, a search team headed by Phil
McCausland, a postdoctoral fellow at Western's Centre for Planetary
Science and Exploration, has been scouring the Grimsby area after
working out mathematical models that suggest the fireball crashed
there.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCausland believes there are other meteorites on the ground
that have yet to be found because the meteor weighed as much as a tonne
when it hit Earth's atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He returned to Grimsby yesterday with a search team of a few
people looking around the residential area where the meteorite was
discovered by a Grimsby resident.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was a very unusual rock, so the finder just held onto it,"
McCausland said. "They began to think it was a meteorite after the
media coverage happened."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He would not be specific about where the rock was located,
only that it was "just barely" within the 12-square-kilometre area
south of the town of Grimsby that searchers were focusing on.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tests are being done to try to find out more about the 50-gram object.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery, he said, has buoyed enthusiasm that other pieces
will be found and it will turn out to be a major find for the astronomy
community.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meteorites are relatively common, but it is highly unusual to find one from a meteor videotaped coming through the atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"You don't stop when you find one piece. You keep going," said
McCausland. "Finding one is confirmation that something came down here
and there are probably many others."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are looking intensively in the area of the first find
because "meteorites don't care where they land. They could hit a house,
a roof. They can end up anywhere."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mmcneil@thespec.com
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
905-526-4687&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://trak.in/news/hundreds-in-netherlands-and-germany-see-exploding-fireball-in-sky/15327/" target="_blank"&gt;Hundreds See 'Exploding Fireball' in Sky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Trak.in News/Asian News International&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Washington - Reports indicate that hundreds of people in the
Netherlands and Germany have reported seeing a huge exploding fireball
in the sky on October 13.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a report in &lt;a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091015-fireball-explodes-netherlands-germany-picture.html" target="_blank"&gt;National Geographic News&lt;/a&gt;, amateur photographer Robert Mikaelyan captured the phenomenon on camera.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mikaelyan managed to capture several shots of the fireball as
it swung low over the northern city of Groningen, Netherlands, and
began to break apart into smaller chunks.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I suddenly saw a light in the sky coming fast and quickly got the pictures taken," Mikaelyan said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few seconds after the fireball had been sighted, witnesses heard a
sonic boom followed by low rumbles that rattled windows-signatures of a
high-altitude explosion.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The object was most likely a rogue space rock that
disintegrated shortly after hitting Earth's atmosphere, according to
experts, who speculate that pieces of the meteor may have landed in the
North Sea.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Indeed it was a huge event," said Theo Jurriens, of the Kapteyn Astronomical Institute at the University of Groningen.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earth is constantly being bombarded by smaller debris from comets, asteroids, and even other rocky planets in the solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;But a fireball of this size and brightness is likely seen anywhere in the world only every 20 to 25 years&lt;/strong&gt;, according to Jurriens.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Every 20-25 years? Somebody's not been paying attention. These are from the past 3 weeks:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/194938-US-Meteorite-streaks-across-New-Mexico-sky" target="_blank"&gt;October 9th&lt;/a&gt;: Caught on camera: Meteorite streaks across New Mexico sky
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/194279-Video-Fireball-lights-up-sky-over-Iceland" target="_blank"&gt;October 5th&lt;/a&gt;: Video: Fireball lights up sky over Iceland
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/193976-Cosmic-shock-and-awe-Fireball-explodes-over-Argentina" target="_blank"&gt;Septmber 28th&lt;/a&gt;: Cosmic shock and awe: Fireball explodes over Argentina
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/194980-Video-Grimsby-Ontario-meteor-25-September" target="_blank"&gt;September 25th&lt;/a&gt;: Spectacular Fireball filmed over Canada&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1085502&amp;amp;lang=eng_news" target="_blank"&gt;Taiwanese amateur astronomer discovers new asteroid&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Cheng Chi-feng and Sofia Wu&lt;br /&gt;
Central News Agency&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:05 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Kaohsiung - An amateur astronomer who discovered an asteroid earlier
this year presented a model of his new discovery to Kaohsiung Mayor
Chen Chu Monday to share it with all residents of the southern Taiwan
port city.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tsai Yuan-sheng discovered the asteroid along with an
assistant at the Lulin Observatory on Yushan, also known as Jade
Mountain, March 20 and tentatively named it "Kaohsiung" after his
hometown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In August, the International Astronomical Union's
Committee on Small Body Nomenclature (IAU's CSBN) -- an international
organization responsible for the naming of asteroids and comets --
formally approved the designation and gave Tsai's discovery a permanent
number "215080." It was the first asteroid discovered by an amateur
Taiwanese astronomy buff to have won international recognition.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The asteroid, located between Mars and Jupiter, is similar in
size to Kaohsiung International Airport. At perihelion, the closest
point to the sun in its orbit, the asteroid is 350 million kilometers
from the sun and at aphelion, its most distant point from the sun in
its orbit, it is about 450 million kilometers from the sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It takes about four years for the newly identified asteroid to complete its orbit around the sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tsai and Lin Chi-sheng, an astronomical observation assistant
at Lulin Observatory, spotted the asteroid using highly advanced
digital equipment.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tsai recalled that he first detected that the body could both
rotate around its own axis and circle the Sun and that its position
coordinates varied each day.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I then took photos of the object consecutively for analytical
comparison and finally came to the conclusion that it was an asteroid
that had never been documented before," Tsai recalled.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Tsai, most larger asteroids have been discovered
and only small asteroids that cannot be detected with the naked eye are
still left to be spotted with highly sophisticated instruments.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tsai, 40, began to develop his interest in observing the stars
while studying at a military preparatory school as a teenager. At the
time, he was required to stand guard at night, and the long hours with
nothing to do led him to fall in love with stargazing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He later dropped out of the naval academy to pursue his hobby
more freely. He now often takes his wife and children high into the
mountains to observe the stars at night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tsai has documented 13 asteroids, but "Kaohsiung" is the only one to have been recognized by the IAU's CSBN.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I was so jubilant to obtain international recognition of my
latest discovery and thus decided to name it 'Kaohsiung' to honor my
beloved homeland," Tsai said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I also want to share my happiness in discovering the new body
with all fellow Kaohsiung residents, " Tsai said at the asteroid model
presentation ceremony at the city's Gangho Elementary School.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For her part, Mayor Chen said the discovery of the asteroid
and its designation as "Kaohsiung" are not only the "pride of
Kaohsiung" but also the "pride of Taiwan." Noting that Tsai's
achievement has inspired a "star chasing" fad in the city, Chen said
the city government will step up efforts to promote astronomical
education and cultivate more talent in the field.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chen said she has directed the city's Bureau of Education to
allocate NT$1 million (US$31,056) annually to help finance the
operations of the Gangho Elementary School's astronomy observatory.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She also proposed that an astronomy-themed science park be
established after Kaohsiung City and Kaohsiung County merge next year.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tsai Ching-hua, director of the municipal education bureau,
said the discovery of the asteroid has set a good model for the city's
astronomy education and pledged to study the feasibility of setting up
an astronomy theme park in the new Kaohsiung municipality.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://spaceweather.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Orionid Meteor Shower&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Space Weather&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:16 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28001/full/ff.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Jefferson Teng "&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28001/medium/ff.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Jefferson Teng &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
Orionid meteor shower is underway. Earth is passing through a stream of
dusty debris from Halley's Comet, and this is causing meteors to shoot
out of the constellation Orion. Earlier today, amateur astronomer
Jefferson Teng photographed an Orionid fireball over Shanghai, China.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I woke up early in the morning to observe the shower through
my bedroom window," says Teng. "This one was quite bright considering
the light pollution in Shanghai."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forecasters expect the shower to peak on Wednesday, Oct. 21st,
with dozens of meteors per hour. The best time to look is during the
dark hours before sunrise. For best results, get away from city lights,
but as Teng discovered, country darkness is not absolutely necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ketv.com/irresistible/21423860/detail.html"&gt;Did a meteor make this crater in Latvia?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:07 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28175/full/Lat1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28175/medium/Lat1.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Investigators Say Radiation Levels Normal&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists were investigating Monday whether a large crater found in a
meadow in northern Latvia had been created by meteorite. One expert
said it was likely a hoax.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Experts in the Baltic country rushed to the site after reports
that a metorite-like object had crashed late Sunday in the Mazsalaca
region near the Estonian border.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uldis Nulle, a scientist at the Latvian Environment, Geology
and Meteorology Center, said his first impression after observing the
site late Sunday was that the 27-foot (nine-meter) wide and nine foot
(three-meter) deep crater had been caused by a meteorite. He said there
was smoke coming out of the hole when he arrived. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28176/full/Lat2.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28176/medium/Lat2.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
However,
Dainis Ozols, a nature conservationist who examined the hole in
daylight on Monday, said it appeared to be a hoax. Ozols said he
believes someone dug the hole and tried to make it look like a
meteorite crater by burning some pyrotechnic compound at the bottom. He
added he would analyze some samples taken from the site.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When asked about Ozols' theory, Nulle refused to comment, saying he needed more time to make tests at the site.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inga Vetere of the Fire and Rescue Service said they received a
call about the alleged meteorite on Sunday evening from an eyewitness.
She said a military unit was dispatched to the site and found that
radiation levels were normal. There were no injures.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Experts outside Latvia said it would be unusual for such a
large meteorite to hit the Earth. The planet is constantly bombarded
with objects from outer space, but most burn up in the atmosphere and
never reach the surface.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, a meteorite crashed near Lake Titicaca in Peru, causing a
crater about 40 feet (12 meters) wide and 15 feet (five meters) deep.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28177/full/Lat3.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28177/medium/Lat3.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Asta
Pellinen-Wannberg, a meteorite expert at the Swedish Institute of Space
Research, said she didn't know the details of the Latvian incident, but
that a rock would have to be at least three feet (one meter) in
diameter to create a hole that size.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henning Haack, a lecturer at Copenhagen University's
Geological Museum said more information was needed to confirm that the
crater was indeed caused by a meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"With all these kind of reports we get there always is a pretty large margin of error," he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1222990/Fiery-meteor-creates-50-foot-crater-Latvian-countryside.html"&gt;Hoax? Video footage of blazing 'meteorite' in Latvia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Daily Mail&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:14 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BD5MUSBOBK0&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;amp;color2=0x999999&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" width="425"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A fiery object struck farmland creating a large crater near a small town in northern Latvia.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No-one was injured in the incident and geologists are now studying the object, which may be a meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Locals claimed the object fell near a farmhouse on the outskirts of Mazsalaca town in the district of Valmiera last night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It created a crater which measured 50 feet across and 16 feet deep.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A witness who claimed to have seen the incident described the
'meteorite' as making a noise similar to the one of an aircraft flying
at a low altitude.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ldis Nulle, a scientist at the Latvian Environment, Geology
and Meteorology Center, said there was smoke coming out of the crater
when he arrived at the crash site late Sunday in the Mazsalaca region
near the Estonian border.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'My first impression is that, yes, it was a meteorite,' he
said. 'All the evidence suggests this when compared to pictures of real
meteorite craters.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Reuters" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28172/full/Latvia1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28172/medium/Latvia1.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Reuters&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
He
said the rim of the crater was slightly raised and there was a
black-grayish scar at the bottom - both signs of a meteorite impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Experts outside Latvia said it was unusual for such a large
meteorite to hit the Earth. The planet is constantly bombarded with
objects from outer space, but most burn up in the atmosphere and never
reach the surface.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, a meteorite crashed near Lake Titicaca in Peru, causing a
crater about 40 feet (12 metres) wide and 15 feet (5 metres) deep.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asta Pellinen-Wannberg, a meteorite expert at the Swedish
Institute of Space Research, said she didn't know the details of the
Latvian incident, but that a rock would have to be at least three feet
(one metre) in diameter to create a hole that size.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henning Haack, a lecturer at Copenhagen University's
Geological Museum said more information was needed to confirm that the
crater was indeed caused by a meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28173/full/Latvia2.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28173/medium/Latvia2.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
'With all these kind of reports we get there always is a pretty large margin of error,' he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Latvia, Nulle said a group of experts would examine the
crater today and bring rock samples back to the capital, Riga, for
testing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nulle rushed to the site after people in the area reported seeing a fiery object falling from the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inga Vetere of the Fire and Rescue Service said a military unit
has tested the site and found that radiation levels are normal. There
were no injures.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She said police have cordoned off the area to prevent souvenir hunters from taking away the soil.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'We are not finally sure that this is a meteorite,' she told
Itar-Tass news agency. 'Eyewitnesses said something fell from the sky
and fire started.'
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian blogs posted YouTube video that claimed to show the
remains of the meteor burning brightly shortly after the crash, but the
validity of the video has not yet been confirmed.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© AFP/Getty Images" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28174/full/Latvia3.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28174/medium/Latvia3.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© AFP/Getty Images&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-footer"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.rian.ru/world/20091026/156588612.html"&gt;Meteorite falls in northern Latvia, no one injured&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
RIA Novosti&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:59 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28178/full/Lat4.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/28178/medium/Lat4.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
No one was injured after a meteorite fell near a small town in northern Latvia on Sunday, local Latvian media reported.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to media reports, the meteorite fell near a residential house
on the outskirts of Mazsalaca town in the Valmiera district of Latvia,
leaving a crater of some 20 meters (66 feet) in diameter and 10 meters
(33 feet) deep.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A spokesperson for the Latvian State Fire and Rescue Service
said that rescuers and soldiers immediately cordoned off the territory,
however, it is still not clear whether it was an asteroid or a space
satellite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The territory has been immediately cordoned off as we still
do not know what fell down from the sky. According to preliminary
information, it was a meteorite. However, it is possible that it was a
[space] satellite or its fragment. A radioactive contamination is also
possible," she said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A witness, who saw the object falling from the sky and leaving
a burning trace behind, said it was making a noise similar to the one
of an aircraft flying at a low altitude. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On March 2 this year, a 35-meter asteroid came within
72,000 kilometers of Earth. The size of the space rock was comparable
to the asteroid that caused the Tunguska disaster, but there was no
danger of a collision.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 30, 1908, an explosion equivalent to between 5 and 30
megatons of TNT occurred near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in a
remote region of Russia's Siberia.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tunguska blast flattened 80 million trees, destroying an area of around 2,150 sq km (830 sq miles).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is assumed that a huge meteorite had hit the area, although research expeditions failed to find an obvious crater.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-comment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Update: This incident appears to have been staged
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/195597-Meteorite-that-landed-in-Latvia-is-a-hoax-experts-say"&gt;'Meteorite' that landed in Latvia is a hoax, experts say&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6890838.ece"&gt;'Meteorite' that landed in Latvia is a hoax, experts say&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tony Halpin&lt;br /&gt;
Times Online&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:09 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
It was the student prank that apparently fell to earth after experts
dismissed a meteorite crash in Latvia as an elaborate hoax today.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dramatic video of a fireball at the bottom of an impact crater
on farmland outside the town of Mazsalaca was shown all over the world,
taken by a group of film students who said that they had heard the
meteor strike.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experts who examined the scene were less star-struck. Dr
Ilgonis Vilks, chairman of the scientific council at the University of
Latvia's Institute of Astronomy, said: "It's a fake. It's very
disappointing, I was full of hope coming here, but I am certain it is
not a meteorite."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside the astronomical odds of a group of film
students happening to be at the ready when a meteorite hits the Earth,
Dr Vilks said that several other tell-tale signs had given the game
away. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was green grass inside the crater despite the
intense heat supposedly generated by the meteorite. The impact crater,
initially reported as 10 metres deep, was actually only 3 metres
including a lip of soil a metre high around the hole.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr Vilks said that there was neither ejected material from the
hole nor any fragments of meteorite on the surrounding land. Finally,
there was the flaming "meteorite" itself.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's a ball of clay that was burning. We took some samples
from it and geologists from the university will examine it," Dr Vilks
said. "There was a small blast heard by local people but this was not
strong enough to create the crater and there's only a small area in the
hole that is burnt."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dainis Ozols, a nature conservationist who also examined the
scene, said that he believed somebody had dug the hole and burnt a
pyrotechnic compound at the bottom to make it appear like a meteorite
crater.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alert was first raised on Sunday evening by Ancis
Steinbergs, who said that he had been out filming for a university
project with his girlfriend and a fellow undergraduate. He was refusing
to answer his telephone tonight to answer questions about the experts'
assessments.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had earlier told &lt;em&gt;The Times &lt;/em&gt;that the trio had
heard a loud roaring sound "like an airplane falling from the sky"
seconds before the alleged meteorite hit the field behind some trees.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Steinbergs said: "We saw something burning in the sky like
a ball and it was moving very fast and then there was a loud noise. We
went to find it and there was this big hole with fire burning in it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was so hot that the camera was misting up. We thought it was really dangerous because there might be an explosion."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video taken by the group showed them approaching the lip of the
crater and filming the glowing hot "meteor" at the bottom as they
talked excitedly among themselves. The clip bears similarities in style
to the &lt;em&gt;Blair Witch Project&lt;/em&gt;, a 1999 film based on supposedly "amateur" footage shot by three missing film students.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Steinbergs said that he called Latvia's Fire and Rescue Service.
Inga Vetere, a spokeswoman, said that fire crews had attended the site
and cordoned it off. Tests had recorded normal levels of radiation and
nobody had been hurt.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Local news agencies reported that the landowner, Larisa
Gerasimova, had been quick to capitalise on interest surrounding the
crater and had begun to charge curious visitors $2 to view the site.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earth is bombarded by thousands of small celestial objects
every year but most burn up in the atmosphere before they reach the
surface. The last recorded meteorite strike on land was in 2007 near
Lake Titicaca in Peru, when it left a crater 12 metres wide (40ft) and
five metres deep (15ft).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18046-asteroid-blast-reveals-holes-in-earths-defences.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;amp;nsref=online-news"&gt;Asteroid blast reveals holes in Earth's defences&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
David Shiga&lt;br /&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:04 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
As the US government ponders a strategy to deal with threatening
asteroids, a dramatic explosion over Indonesia has underscored &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/193750-Asteroid-attack-Putting-Earth-s-defences-to-the-test"&gt;how blind&lt;/a&gt; we still are to hurtling space rocks.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 8 October an asteroid detonated high in the atmosphere above South
Sulawesi, Indonesia, releasing about as much energy as 50,000 tons of
TNT, according to a NASA estimate released on Friday. That's about
three times more powerful than the atomic bomb that levelled Hiroshima,
making it one of the largest asteroid explosions ever observed.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the blast caused no damage on the ground because of
the high altitude, 15 to 20 kilometres above Earth's surface, says
astronomer Peter Brown of the University of Western Ontario (UWO),
Canada.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brown and Elizabeth Silber, also of UWO, estimated the
explosion energy from infrasound waves that rippled halfway around the
world and were recorded by an international network of instruments that
listens for nuclear explosions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explosion was heard by witnesses in Indonesia. &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeQBzTkJNhs&amp;amp;videos=jkRJgbXY-90"&gt;Video&lt;/a&gt; images of the sky following the event show a dust trail characteristic of an exploding asteroid.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Sudden impact&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of energy released suggests the object was about 10 metres
across, the researchers say. Such objects are thought to hit Earth
about once per decade.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;No telescope spotted the asteroid ahead of its impact&lt;/strong&gt;.
That is not surprising, given that only a tiny fraction of asteroids
smaller than 100 metres across have been catalogued, says Tim Spahr,
director of the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Yet
objects as small as 20 or 30 metres across may be capable of doing
damage on the ground, he says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"If you want to find the smallest objects you have to build
more, larger telescopes," says Spahr. "A survey that finds all of the
20-metre objects will cost probably multiple billions of dollars."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House must develop a policy to address the asteroid
hazard by October 2010 under a deadline imposed by Congress. It is
likely to be influenced by a report from the National Research Council
on the asteroid problem, which is expected by year's end.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-comment --&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-footer"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;A Service of &lt;a href="http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/"&gt;Signs of the Times&lt;/a&gt;: The most comprehensive, objective and reliable Alternative News Source on the Web. If you aren't reading &lt;a href="http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/"&gt;SOTT&lt;/a&gt;, you don't know what's REALLY happening!&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8385115091808825739-5105788206620207389?l=fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com/2009/10/october-2009.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keit)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385115091808825739.post-3765460013290661940</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-28T05:04:45.122Z</atom:updated><title>September 2009</title><description>&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/marlborough-express/news/2818163/Meteor-seen-along-NZ"&gt;Meteor Seen Along New Zealand&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192457-Meteor-Seen-Along-New-Zealand#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The Marlborough Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:00 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A fiery meteor blazed a trail through the skies on Friday morning, with sightings reported from Christchurch to Rotorua.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zoe Battersby, out for an early walk along Jimmy Amers beach in Kaikoura at around 6.10am, said she couldn't help but notice it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was very bright the size of a streetlight. It looked like it fell into the sea," she said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alan Gilmore, resident superintendent of the Canterbury University Mt
John Observatory, said meteors entered the atmosphere over New Zealand
"several times a year", but he doubted that the rock made it to the
ground or water level. "This meteor is very typical, and often they
burn up at about 70 kilometres up," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"They are coming into a thicker atmosphere, travelling at 30km a second.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The friction is strong and they slow up and start to break up.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's like throwing a stone at a concrete path."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Gilmore said as meteors broke up, witnesses often saw a bright flash known as a "terminal fireball".
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meteors could be seen from as far as 1000km away and at a height of 100km.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"They are spectacular, often a bright white centre which is the
actual rock ... a tiny, brilliant star with a teardrop-shaped glow
that's brilliant emerald green caused by the oxygen and the radiation
coming off the rock."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Gilmore said a sonic boom often heralded the rare occasion of a meteor landing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He expected Friday's meteor entered the atmosphere somewhere over the North Island because of the range of reported sightings.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The impression of closeness is deceptive.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Because they are bright, people think [the meteorite] landed a couple of paddocks away."
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/8239188.stm"&gt;Ireland: Huge 'sky explosion' investigated&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
BBC News&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:19 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
An Irish astronomy group is calling for help in tracing the origin of a
huge explosion in the skies over the country on Thursday evening.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomy Ireland said it was currently investigating the explosion, which occurred at 2100 BST.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A spokesman said the most likely explanation was a space rock or satellite crashing into the atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group wants anyone who witnessed the event to contact its website at www.astronomy.ie
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomy Ireland chairman David Moore said: "So far, reports
have been registered by residents in west Cork, Kerry, Cavan and as far
north as Donegal, thus suggesting that this spectacular event may have
been witnessed by people all over the country.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"In the past two decades there have been two major explosions in the skies over Ireland.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"When we investigated these, we were able to conclude that one
was a Russian military satellite that exploded over the country, and
the other was a rock from space which we predicted would have fallen on
Carlow and this rock was indeed found, becoming the last meteorite fall
of the millennium."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Moore said the explosion should not be confused with a
hugely-bright star which was positioned just below the full moon on
Thursday night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This was actually the planet Jupiter and it can be
characterised by being by far the brightest star in the entire night
sky," he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17752-rain-of-meteorites-makes-the-moon-hum.html"&gt;Rain of meteorites makes the moon hum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Rachel Courtland&lt;br /&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:38 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26371/full/dn17752_1_300.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26371/medium/dn17752_1_300.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;A constant rain of meteorite impacts makes the moon hum.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
man in the moon is humming a tune, but thankfully the noise won't drown
out sensors on future missions peeking at the lunar interior.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A steady barrage of small meteorite impacts should cause the
moon to "ring", but no seismometers sent to the moon to date have been
sensitive enough to hear it. So Philippe Lognonné at the Institute of
Earth Physics of Paris and colleagues decided to work out how loud the
ring is.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team estimated the meteorite population in the solar
neighbourhood, and calculated the likely seismic signals that would be
created by a range of meteorite sizes and velocities as they strike the
moon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Apollo calibration&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To determine how the vibrations from these impacts would be seen by
seismometers, the team used data taken by Apollo seismometers four
decades ago. These measured the vibrations created by the landings of
lunar modules and spent rocket stages.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the precise locations and timing of these landings were
known, they could be used to gauge how long it would take vibrations
caused by meteorite impacts to travel through the moon, and how much
the signals might dim.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their calculations revealed space rocks with masses ranging
from a gram to a kilogram do indeed create a hum, but it is subtle.
Earth's hum - created by pounding waves - is more than 1000 times
louder.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This shows that all planets may hum, those with and those without atmosphere," says Lognonné.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;It's oh so quiet&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moon-hum's quietness means future lunar seismometers should
be able to peek deep within the moon without the hum creating
problematic background noise, says Lognonné.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead seismometers can focus on measuring waves created by
moonquakes, tremors created by a variety of sources, including the
tidal tug of the Earth. Because seismic waves are sensitive to the
type, arrangement and density of rocks they pass through, studying the
quakes can reveal more about the moon's interior.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The network of seismometers left by the Apollo missions has
been shut down since 1977, so Lognonné hopes more sensitive instruments
will be sent to the moon soon. These could reach deeper than the Apollo
network to measure the size of the moon's core. "The area within 500
kilometres of the centre of the moon is complete unknown to
seismology," Lognonné says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I think [the study] is a great idea," says Clive Neal of the
University of Notre Dame in Indiana, who was not associated with the
research. "Estimating the actual background noise is critical for
designing the next generation of seismometers to go to the moon."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first instrument may be a seismometer proposed for Japan's
Selene-2 moon mission, which aims to send a lander to the surface,
perhaps as early as 2015.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Journal of Geophysical Research &lt;/em&gt;(in press)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.theprovince.com/technology/Vancouver+light+show+meteor+space+junk/1989944/story.html"&gt;Was Vancouver light show a meteor or space junk?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Kimberley Shearon&lt;br /&gt;
The Province&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:01 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
It wasn't a bird and it wasn't a plane. Was it a meteor?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around 8 p.m. Saturday night a great, big ball of yellowy-white light streaked from east to west across the darkening sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomer David Dodge said that the fireball was probably a meteor  -  basically a rock falling from space.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It probably wasn't a piece of space junk. The reason why I saw that is
that it was going from east to west, and 99.9 per cent of space stuff
sent up there is not going east to west." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said meteors fall to earth every day.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most burn up before they enter the earth's atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saturday's meteor was notable only because it happened over a populated area Some eye-witnesses, however, had their doubts.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steve Salsman, was out on his deck when he saw the white ball of light hurtling through the dusky night air.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was at about the height of an airplane and had a long red tail," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the fiery ball appeared to break up, Salsman said he automatically
thought that the it might be a dead satellite re-entering the earth's
atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another eye-witness, Miles Wishlow, also said he thought the fireball was space junk falling from the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He saw a "shard" break off from the fireball.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It looked like something man-made that was just way off-course."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fireball itself, Wishlow said, didn't resemble anything he's seen then past.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The shape wasn't a perfect circle," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was so big and so low compared to the shooting stars and
other meteor showers. It was a lot closer than anything I've ever
seen."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dodge said Saturday's meteor might have landed somewhere along
Vancouver Island's west coast or in the Pacific Ocean - if it landed at
all.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Space-enthusiasts, he said, would be hard-pressed to find a chunk of the meteor, even if it did make it to earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was something 100 km over its ground path travelling at 70 km per second," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The human eye has a tough time dealing with that and tends to go for the easy answer. It's not in our neighbour's backyard."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dodge also pointed out that once a meteor lands on earth it is no more remarkable than a regular old rock.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest difference is that space rocks get to go out in a blaze of glory.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was quite breathtaking. Four of us were just standing there watching it," said Wishlow.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sue Kendall was at her Saturna Island home on the phone with her son in Vancouver when she saw the bright, fast-moving light.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I said, 'Oh my goodness,' and he looked up and saw it too,"
she said. "Your brain takes a moment to process it....it was amazing."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/09/13/jupiter-captured-comet-as-temporary-moon/"&gt;Jupiter Captured Comet as Temporary Moon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nancy Atkinson&lt;br /&gt;
Universe Today&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:00 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26627/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26627/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Jupiter's
gravity well has been known to capture objects - evidenced by the
recent impact on the gas giant discovered by amateur astronomer Anthony
Wesley. But one object captured by Jupiter in the mid 1900's was later
able to escape from the planet's clutches. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have found comet 147P/Kushida-Muramatsu was captured as a
temporary moon of Jupiter, and remained trapped in an irregular orbit
for about twelve years. "Our results demonstrate some of the routes
taken by cometary bodies through interplanetary space that can allow
them either to enter or to escape situations where they are in orbit
around the planet Jupiter," said team member Dr. David Archer.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With this discovery, five such objects have now been
discovered where the phenomenon of temporary satellite capture (TSC)
has occurred, but this new research suggests it might happen more
frequently than was expected. Kushida-Muramatsu orbited Jupiter between
1949 and 1961, the third longest capture period of the five objects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An international team led by Dr. Katsuhito Ohtsuka
modeled the trajectories of 18 "quasi-Hilda comets," objects with the
potential to go through a temporary satellite capture by Jupiter that
results in them either leaving or joining the "Hilda" group of objects
in the asteroid belt. Most of the cases of temporary capture were
flybys, where the comets did not complete a full orbit. However, the
research team used recent observations tracking Kushida-Muramatsu over
nine years to calculate hundreds of possible orbital paths for the
comet over the previous century. In all scenarios, Kushida-Muramatsu
completed two full revolutions of Jupiter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Ohtsuka/Asher" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26572/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26572/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Ohtsuka/Asher&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Figure showing comet Kushida-Muramatsu’s orbital path around Jupiter &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
"Asteroids
and comets can sometimes be distorted or fragmented by tidal effects
induced by the gravitational field of a capturing planet, or may even
impact with the planet," said Archer, as did comet D/1993 F2
(Shoemaker-Levy 9), which was torn apart on passing close to Jupiter
and whose fragments then collided with that planet in 1994. Previous
computational studies have shown that Shoemaker-Levy 9 may well have
been a quasi-Hilda comet before its capture by Jupiter. The object that
impacted with Jupiter this July, causing a new dark spot may also have
been a member of this class, even if it did not suffer tidal disruption
like Shoemaker-Levy.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Our work has become very topical again with the discovery
this July of an expanding debris plume, created by the dust from the
colliding object, which is the evident signature of an impact. The
results of our study suggest that impacts on Jupiter and temporary
satellite capture events may happen more frequently than we previously
expected," said Asher.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team has also confirmed a future moon of Jupiter. Comet
111P/Helin-Roman-Crockett, which has already orbited Jupiter three
times between 1967 and 1985, is due to complete six laps of the giant
planet between 2068 and 2086.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Fortunately for us Jupiter, as the most massive planet with
the greatest gravity, sucks objects towards it more readily than other
planets and we expect to observe large impacts there more often than on
Earth. Comet Kushida-Muramatsu has escaped from the giant planet and
will avoid the fate of Shoemaker-Levy 9 for the foreseeable future,"
said Asher.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery is to be presented at the European Planetary Science Congress in Potsdam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/3242/catastrophic-darkness-"&gt;Catastrophic Darkness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Jeremy Hsu&lt;br /&gt;
Astrobiology Magazine&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:24 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Donald E. Davis" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26574/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26574/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Donald E. Davis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This
painting depicts an asteroid slamming into tropical, shallow seas of
the Yucatan Peninsula in what is today southeast Mexico. The aftermath
of this immense asteroid collision, which occurred approximately 65
million years ago, is believed to have caused the extinction of the
dinosaurs and many other species on Earth.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New
studies of mixotrophic algae have shown how such organisms could
survive the darkened skies that follow a major asteroid impact. Such
studies indicate how life manages to survive after a mass extinction
event.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A dinosaur-killing asteroid may have wiped out much of life on Earth 65
million years ago, but now scientists have discovered how smaller
organisms might have survived in the darkness following such a
catastrophic impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Survival may have depended upon jack-of-all-trades organisms
called mixotrophs that can consume organic matter in the absence of
sunlight. That would have proved crucial during the long months of dust
and debris blotting out the sun, when plenty of dead or dying organic
matter filled the Earth's oceans and lakes.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Mixotrophs are very good at stabilizing situations by using
whatever resources are there, and can often provide what resources
there aren't," said Harriet Jones, a biologist at the University of
East Anglia in the UK. "They're very good at coping in extreme
environments, and enabling other organisms to live." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jones and her colleagues tested the limits of
mixotrophs by subjecting them to six months of low light or complete
darkness. The mixotrophs not only thrived, but also surprised
researchers by helping sunlight-dependent organisms also survive pitch
black conditions.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Simulating catastrophe&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists have long debated the overall impact of the K-T
extinction that may have heralded the end of the dinosaurs, but most
researchers agree that such an event would have thrown up enough dust
and debris to darken Earth's skies for about six months. A lack of
sunlight would have killed off a majority of plants, eliminating the
food supply for animals higher up the food chain.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many scientists assumed that even smaller organisms would
struggle just to stay alive during months of almost complete darkness.
Some previous studies even looked at how some organisms such as
mixotrophs can survive low light and low food conditions. But no one
had tried to test how well mixotrophs would survive the catastrophic
environment following something such as the K-T event, Jones said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The literature was always saying in that biological
production would cease in a post-catastrophic environment," Jones
noted. "We felt that because of what mixotrophy algae could do, that
wasn't always the case."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jones joined forces with Charles Cockell, a microbiologist at
the Open University based in the UK who specializes in catastrophic
environments, as well as other researchers. They tested both freshwater
and ocean mixotrophs under conditions ranging from low light to
complete darkness for six months, and added food sources during
short-term experiments to simulate decaying organic matter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Jones and her colleagues also wanted to see how
mixotrophs fared when living together with phototrophs, or
light-dependent organisms. They tested mixotrophs and phototrophs
separately and together under the different light conditions.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Live together or die alone&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turns out that the mixotrophs survived all the experiments, and
some even grew under the low light conditions. Their ability to consume
other organisms or organic matter helped them rebound quickly after low
light returned, perhaps similar to the clouds of dust and debris
finally beginning to clear.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the real shock came from how well light-dependent
organisms did when living with the mixotrophs. No photosynthesis could
take place under the complete darkness, but the phototrophs mostly
managed to survive based on nutrients cycled by the active mixotrophs.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We were extremely surprised at how well phototrophs did
during six months darkness, when they can't eat at all," Jones said.
Such findings may cause researchers to rethink how well certain life
forms survived the catastrophic impacts that dot Earth's geological
record.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, the mixotroph activity allowed the phototroph
populations to rebound quickly back to normal within a month. And in
the end, both mixotrophs and phototrophs tended to fare better when
living together.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"So long as mixotrophs are cycling nutrients, [phototroph]
algae can take off quickly and get the life cycle going," Jones
explained.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Life lessons for survival&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only one low light condition saw phototrophs fail to survive
while living with mixotrophs. The phototrophs may have used too much
energy trying to do photosynthesis in the weak light, or perhaps the
hungry mixotrophs simply fed on their fellow organisms.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"You can only do so much in a flask, and obviously the mix of
species would be much greater in a natural environment," Jones pointed
out.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, the overall results suggest how mixotrophs provide a
cushion against catastrophe for certain ecosystems, and may even
prevent huge population crashes. The research is further detailed in
the July/August issue of the journal &lt;em&gt;Astrobiology&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jones and her colleagues plan to conduct more studies with greater
mixes of species, in an environment that would more closely resemble
the natural world. They also want to shorten experiments to three
months rather than six.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That looks all well and good for the smaller organisms. But
humans, who would have a much harder time feeding themselves if the
skies went dark, may want to plan on how to prevent such catastrophic
asteroid impacts in the future.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.physorg.com/news172306060.html"&gt;Mini-Comets Within a Comet Lit Up 17P/Holmes During Megaoutburst&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
PhysOrg&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:41 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Jewitt/Stevenson/Kleyna" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26788/full/comet_holmes.gif"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26788/medium/comet_holmes.gif" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Jewitt/Stevenson/Kleyna&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Reveals the expansion of the coma of comet Holmes over 9 nights in 2007 November.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Astronomers
from the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of
Hawaii have discovered multiple fragments ejected during the largest
cometary outburst ever witnessed. Images and animations showing
fragments rapidly flying away from the nucleus of comet 17P/Holmes will
be presented by Rachel Stevenson at the European Planetary Science
Congress in Potsdam, Germany, on Wednesday 16 September.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stevenson, together with colleagues Jan Kleyna and David
Jewitt, began observing comet Holmes in October 2007 soon after it was
reported that the small (3.6 km wide) body had brightened by a million
times in less than a day. They continued observing for several weeks
after the outburst using the Canada- France- Hawaii Telescope in Hawaii
and watched as the dust cloud ejected by the comet grew to be larger
than the Sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The astronomers examined a sequence of images taken over nine
nights in November 2007 using a digital filter that enhances sharp
discontinuities within images. The filter, called a Laplacian filter,
is particularly good at picking out faint small-scale features that
would otherwise remain undetected against the bright background of the
expanding comet. They found numerous small objects that moved radially
away from the nucleus at speeds up to 125 metres per second (280 mph).
These objects were too bright to simply be bare rocks, but instead were
more like mini-comets creating their own dust clouds as the ice
sublimated from their surfaces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Initially we thought this comet was unique simply
because of the scale of the outburst," said Stevenson. "But we soon
realized that the aftermath of the outburst showed unusual features,
such as these fast-moving fragments, that have not been detected around
other comets."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© Jewitt, Stevenson, Kleyna" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26789/full/holmes_filter.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Comet" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26789/medium/holmes_filter.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Jewitt, Stevenson, Kleyna&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Image
of comet Holmes from the 3.6-meter Canada-France-Hawaii telescope on
Mauna Kea showing the large expanding dust coma. On the left, a 'raw'
image is shown, in which the brightness reflects the distribution of
dust in the coma of the comet (the nucleus is in the bright, point-like
region to the upper left of center). On the right is shown the same
image after application of the Laplacian spatial filter, to emphasize
fine structures. The white/black circular objects are background stars
enhanced by the Laplacian filter.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
While cometary
outbursts are common, their causes are unknown. One possibility is that
internal pressure built up as the comet moved closer to the Sun and
sub-surface ices evaporated.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pressure eventually became too great and part of the
surface broke away, releasing a huge cloud of dust and gas, as well as
larger fragments.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surprisingly, the solid nucleus of comet Holmes survived the
outburst and continued on its orbit, seemingly unperturbed. Holmes
takes approximately 6 years to circle the Sun, and travels between the
inner edge of the asteroid belt to beyond Jupiter. The comet is now
moving away from the Sun but will return to its closest approach to the
Sun in 2014, when astronomers will examine it for signs of further
outbursts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17806-rare-meteorite-found-by-fireball-observatory.html"&gt;Rare Meteorite Found by 'Fireball' Observatory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hazel Muir&lt;br /&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:36 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Desert Fireball Network, funding from STFC and the EU" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26847/full/dn17806_1_500.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26847/medium/dn17806_1_500.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Desert Fireball Network, funding from STFC and the EU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This
all-sky image was taken by the Desert Fireball Network in Western
Australia with a fish-eye lens. The film is exposed for most of the
night, so stars trace long curves; the white streak diagonally across
them is a firebal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
A rare meteorite that may have been
born in Earth's neighbourhood has been found using a new 'fireball'
observatory in Australia.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists can learn how the solar system formed by studying
meteorites that originated in different places within it. The trouble
is, they don't know where the vast majority of meteorites actually came
from.
&lt;br /&gt;
"Trying to interpret what happened in the early solar system
without knowing where meteorites are from is like trying to interpret
the geology of Britain from random rocks dumped in your back yard," says&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/people/p.a.bland"&gt; Phil Bland &lt;/a&gt;at&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/"&gt; Imperial College London&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To remedy that, Bland's team set up the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18424792.200-how-to-catch-a-falling-star.html"&gt;Desert Fireball Network&lt;/a&gt;
in Western Australia's Nullarbor Desert in 2006. This trial network,
currently with four robotic cameras spread over roughly 250,000 square
kilometres, exposes photographic film to clear skies throughout the
night. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the cameras record a bright meteor, or fireball, as
a rock falls through Earth's atmosphere, scientists can calculate its
trajectory by &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation"&gt;triangulation&lt;/a&gt;, estimate the rock's likely landing site, then look for it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Small parent&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the network's first observation of a fireball on 20 July
2007, search parties found three fragments of the resulting meteorite,
named Bunburra Rockhole, in 2008 and 2009.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The meteorite is made of basalt, the most common type of
solidified lava on Earth. Scientists typically assume that basaltic
meteorites are chips off the giant &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12101-hubble-movie-captures-spinning-space-rock.html"&gt;asteroid&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Vesta is so large - roughly 530 kilometres across - that gravity
caused its component materials to settle into different layers soon
after its formation. The compounds in this meteorite, by contrast, are
better mixed, suggesting it came from a smaller asteroid a few tens of
kilometres wide.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Molten rock&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Orbital calculations suggest this parent asteroid orbited in
the innermost side of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter until
a collision chipped Bunburra Rockhole off the asteroid around 10 or 20
million years ago.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But though its parent body once orbited inside the asteroid belt, it may have been born closer to the sun. A &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8729-iron-meteorites-may-be-solar-system-boomerangs.html"&gt;theory proposed in 2006&lt;/a&gt;
argues that molten rock swirled around the young sun only in the
current region of Venus, Earth and Mars, with many molten blobs
subsequently flung out to the innermost asteroid belt.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that case, Bunburra Rockhole could represent the type of
material that clumped together to build Earth. "Our big question is -
what were the building blocks for the terrestrial planets?" says Bland.
"This rock gets us a little bit closer to that."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journal reference: Science (&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1174787"&gt;DOI: 10.1126/science.1174787&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://fwix.com/share/29_68537e85f6#"&gt;Astronomical Birth Event Results in a Multitude of 'Baby' Comets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Helen Altonn&lt;br /&gt;
Honolulu Star Bulletin&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:03 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26853/full/20090917_nws_comet.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26853/medium/20090917_nws_comet.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This 2007 image taken from the Hubble Space Telescope shows a jellyfish-shaped Comet Holmes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Astronomers
who were dazzled by the 2007 explosion of a comet into the largest
object in the solar system have discovered it gave birth to a bunch of
baby comets.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reporting the "largest comet birth ever seen" were David
Jewitt, Rachel Stevenson and Jan Kleyna, who observed the event through
a Mauna Kea telescope.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jewitt, a professor, and Stevenson, his graduate student, left
the University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy this summer to join
the University of California, Los Angeles. Kleyna is an astrobiology
postdoctoral researcher at the institute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They and others on an institute team observed the
spectacular outburst of Comet 17P/Holmes in October and November 2007
from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope on Mauna Kea.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The normally obscure comet burst from a tiny nucleus of ice
and rock into an object larger than the sun. The astronomers measured
the mass of ejected dust at 900,000 miles across. The diameter of the
sun, by comparison, is 865,000 miles.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was quite an event," Kleyna said in an interview
yesterday. "We got some very high-quality data with a very large camera
on the CFH Telescope."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the astronomers digitally enhanced the images and
"over several nights found these bright spots" flying away from the
nucleus of the comet at speeds of up to 280 mph.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We concluded these probably were pieces of icy substance expelled from Comet Holmes like mini-comets," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If they were solid chunks of ice they would have been invisible
but they were bright with activity, creating their own dust clouds as
surface ice vaporized and transformed into gas, Kleyna said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"There have been some fragmented comets," Kleyna said, "but I
don't think we've seen an eruption that generated many comets before."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Initially, we thought this comet was unique simply because of
the scale of the outburst," Stevenson said in a statement. "But we soon
realized that the aftermath of the outburst showed unusual features,
such as these fast-moving fragments that have not been detected around
other comets."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team continued observing for several weeks. Jewitt, in a &lt;em&gt;Star-Bulletin&lt;/em&gt;
interview in 2007, said the comet was expanding at about 1,100 mph and
was "an unprecedented million times brighter" than before.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the astronomers saw was "just awesome," Jewitt said, and "&lt;strong&gt;very, very weird. An outburst by a factor of a million is staggering, and I don't know of a previous case like this,&lt;/strong&gt;" he said as he and his team studied the expanding comet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sightings of the baby comets were reported at the European Planetary Science Congress this week in Potsdam, Germany.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comet Holmes was discovered in an outburst in November 1892,
then again in January 1893, probably when the comet was at its closest
to the sun, Jewitt said in 2007.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It takes Comet Holmes about six years to circle the sun,
traveling between the inner edge of the asteroid belt to beyond
Jupiter. Its next closest approach to the sun will be in 2014.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kleyna said the astronomers are still analyzing data from the
2007 observations. "There are other interesting details of the comet
we're looking at."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090911210024.htm"&gt;What Do Dinosaurs And The Maya Have In Common?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Science Daily&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:01 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© iStockphoto/John Hak" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26932/full/090911210024_large.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Mayapan" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26932/medium/090911210024_large.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© iStockphoto/John Hak&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;The main pyramid at Mayapan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
One
of the world's most famous asteroid craters, the Chicxulub crater, has
been the subject of research for about twenty years. The asteroid
impact that formed it probably put an end to the dinosaurs and helped
mammals to flourish. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Together with an Anglo-American team, an ETH Zurich researcher has
studied the most recent deposits that filled the crater. The results
provide accurate dating of the limestones and a valuable basis for
archaeologists to research the Maya.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of the Chicxulub asteroid crater was detective
work: in 1980, based on iridium anomalies in clay sediments - which
could only be formed extraterrestrially - the American physicist Walter
Alvarez postulated a devastating asteroid impact at the transition from
the Cretaceous to the Paleogene around 65 million years ago. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another ten years passed before the associated crater
was discovered on the Yucatan peninsula. Research work since then has
focused mainly on the structure of the crater, which has been buried in
a layer of sediment up to two kilometres thick since its formation and
which can only be studied using boreholes or geophysical methods. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Little is known about the sediments close to the surface. Most of the
geological maps also originate from the time before the Chicxulub
crater was discovered, and do not completely reflect the geology.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Crater ring as a geological boundary&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Geological Survey of Canada" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26934/full/grav_3.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Chicxulub Crater 2" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26934/medium/grav_3.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Geological Survey of Canada&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Chicxulub crater gravity map - white dots represent the locations of water-filled sinkholes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Together
with American and English researchers, Adrian Gilli, Senior Lecturer at
the Geological Institute of ETH Zurich, has now filled in a few of the
gaps in the knowledge about the near-surface rock deposits. Gilli says,
"The crater ring of the Chicxulub crater is scarcely recognisable in
the terrain." This is despite the fact that it is distinctly different,
geo-morphologically speaking, from the crater interior: the ring, which
is about five kilometres wide and has a radius of approximately 90
kilometres around the port of Chicxulub, is criss-crossed by fractures
that also occur frequently outside the crater ring. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The limestone along these faults has been riddled with holes and eroded
by rain and groundwater. A process known as karstification has to date
created about 3000 circular collapses forming small basins filled with
groundwater. The Maya called these basins "d'zonot", or "cenotes",
regarding them as a direct connection to the underworld and using such
places as sacrificial sites.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Crater sediments distinctly younger&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously, the rocks outside the crater ring were suspected to
be older than those inside, but now researchers have for the first time
been able to determine their precise age using a method based on the
isotope ratios of strontium 87 to strontium 86 in the limestone, thus
confirming their suspicions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rock samples inside the ring gave an age of between 2.3 and 6
million years. On the other hand, the rocks outside the ring showed
more variable strontium isotope ratios and are from 10 to 33 million
years old. Gilli suspects that the crater basin had been covered by
seawater for a prolonged time, which allowed the more recent sediments
to be deposited there.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results help to understand the geology better and to
re-draw and refine the outdated maps. Archaeology research can also
benefit from the geologists' work: for example, the life of the Maya,
whose important settlements Mayapán and Chichén Itzá are located in
these two geologically different regions, can be better researched on
the basis of the strontium data.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gilli explains, "We really wanted to carry out a purely
geo-archaeological study in which, initially, the crater played no part
at all." The aim was to refine an earlier strontium isotopes study of
the rocks around the former Maya sites by adding 72 new samples to
enable the identification of small-scale variations in the isotope
ratio. This is because the transitions between regions with a different
ratio of strontium 87 to strontium 86 can be particularly important:
Gilli says, enthusiastically, "We can obtain a very large amount of
information about the lifestyle of the people from settlements at such
boundaries, such as the Maya city of Mayapán."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Geology and archaeology complement each other&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Geological Survey of Canada" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26935/full/qtz_chic.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Chicxulub Crater 3" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/26935/medium/qtz_chic.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Geological Survey of Canada&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Shocked quartz grains produced by the impact (intracrater breccia sample Y6 N14 of the Chicxulub crater)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
For
instance, the fine-mesh geological measurement network in conjunction
with the biological strontium isotope values makes migration movements
visible. It could yield knowledge about where the Maya obtained their
building materials or where they cultivated their maize. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is because the weathering of rocks carries strontium into the soil
and from there into plants. When eaten by humans or animals in food,
strontium instead of calcium is incorporated into teeth when they are
formed in childhood. If detailed strontium isotopes maps are available,
this enables the region in which a person grew up to be determined.
Gilli says, "It gets particularly exciting if the origin of the rulers
of the various Maya towns can be determined. This in turn allows
conclusions to be drawn about the social structures of the Maya." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scientist is convinced that the geological analyses of the
strontium isotope ratios form an important basis for the work of the
archaeologists, who are working ever more frequently with the
biological strontium isotopes from bones or teeth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Chicxulub asteroid crater&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The asteroid with a diameter of about ten kilometres that
created the Chicxulub crater most probably caused the worldwide
extinction of species at the boundary between the Cretaceous and the
Palaeogene. The event caused the extinction of about 75 percent of all
species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its effect was due mainly to the fact that it impacted into rocks rich
in carbonate and anhydrite. This hurled massive amounts of carbon
dioxide (CO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere. It is
estimated that between 200 and 3000 cubic kilometres of sediments
vaporised, releasing 35 to 700 million tons of sulphur and 10 billion
tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ozone layer would probably have been destroyed within a very short
time, and there must have been complete darkness over the Earth for
months due to the dust in the atmosphere. This had serious short- and
long-term consequences for the climate and biosphere. The crater that
remains has a diameter of 180 kilometres and extends from the Yucatán
peninsula to the Gulf of Mexico.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Maya&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first evidence of the Maya in Central America can be traced
back to 3000 B.C. Over the course of history, their cultural centres
moved from the uplands to the lowlands and finally to the north of the
Yucatán. Chichén Itzá in the north-west of the Yucatán peninsula
flourished during the classical period, whereas Mayapán was the last
Maya capital in the north of the peninsula. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the Spanish arrived in the late 15th century, the centres of
post-classical Maya culture were in the extreme north of the Yucatán,
while the central lowlands remained only thinly populated. Today,
around 6.1 million Maya still live on the Yucatán peninsula and in
Belize, Guatemala and Honduras.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Gilli A. et al.: Geological and archaeological implications of
strontium isotope analysis of exposed bedrock in the Chicxulub crater
basin, northwestern Yucatán, Mexico. Geology (2009), 37, 723-726,
doi:10.1130/G30098A.1
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2009/09/0925vitim-meteorite"&gt;Sept. 25, 2002: Mysterious Meteorite Dazzles Siberia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Randy Alfred&lt;br /&gt;
Wired&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:47 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27043/full/meteor_2002_Siberia.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Siberia Meteorite 2002" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27043/medium/meteor_2002_Siberia.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;2002:&lt;/span&gt;
A large fireball flashes across the night skies of the Irkutsk region
of Siberia. What may have been a comet causes electrical circuits to
come alive and leaves residents worrying about radioactivity.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eyewitnesses saw the sky light up. More than a hundred people in the sparsely settled area reported seeing it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least one person fell to the floor in horror, believing that some religious &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://english.pravda.ru/society/2003/03/18/44571.html"&gt;doomsday had arrived&lt;/a&gt;. Others were sure that nuclear war had broken out.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The region was in an accustomed power blackout that night. But even as
the meteor's visible energy lit up the skies outside, &lt;strong&gt;its strong electrical field activated the power grid&lt;/strong&gt;. Residents reported that the lamps in their homes turned on for a few seconds.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People who were outside heard a buzzing, crackling sound in the air. The tops of fence posts lit up with &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/n03met7.htm"&gt;electrical discharges&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The impact shattered windows for a dozen miles around and was &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article1139561.ece"&gt;felt up to 60 miles away&lt;/a&gt;. Scientists in Irkutsk recorded "&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2309117.stm"&gt;seismic waves&lt;/a&gt; comparable to a middle-power earthquake."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early reports indicated that local people may have suffered mild
radiation poisoning, symptomized by aching joints, kidney problems and
high blood pressure.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hunters who first explored the area near the presumed impact reported an area of downed trees surrounded by charred forest.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com/2007/03/march-november-2002.html"&gt;Institute of Solar and Earth Physics&lt;/a&gt;
of the Siberian division of the Russian Academy of Sciences wanted to
investigate, but was hampered by a lack of funds and the remoteness of
the area. It was May 2003 before a scientific expedition could reach
the hilly forests of &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-23958558_ITM"&gt;Bodaibo, northeast of Irkutsk&lt;/a&gt;, and Lake Baikal.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists found about 40 square miles of trees smashed in the pattern
associated with big explosions. The meteorite had broken up before
hitting the ground and left a score of craters, up to 65 feet in
diameter. Nearby tree stumps were shattered or burned.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A U.S. spy satellite that had picked up the blazing ball at
about 40 miles altitude lost it a little below 20 miles: It's possible
that's where the ball exploded.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. military analysts estimated the explosion as equivalent
to 0.2 to 0.5 kilotons, though Russian physicist Andrey Olkhovatov
placed it much higher at 4 to 5 kilotons.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No large fragments were found, only tiny hollow spheres,
generally less than 0.1 to 0.2 millimeters diameter. The brown and
dark-brown particles contained oxide and silicate minerals typical of
meteorites, along with pyrite with nickel content, and various iron
compounds. None of these is typical of the local geology.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some sources say &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.meteorites.com.au/odds&amp;amp;ends/russia.html"&gt;gamma radiation was at background level&lt;/a&gt;, but others say local &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitim_event"&gt;water samples showed high levels of tritium&lt;/a&gt;, along with radioactive isotopes of cobalt and cesium.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether the fireball was rock that pulverized or, as some
Soviet scientists concluded, an icy comet, there's this scary fact to
consider: &lt;span class="BoldRed"&gt;It was not picked up in advance by any existing warning systems.&lt;/span&gt; If the fireball had exploded on or over a major city, it could have killed tens of thousands of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong style="color: red;"&gt;Flashback:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article1139561.ece"&gt;Siberia meteorite flattens 40 sq miles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Robin Shepherd&lt;br /&gt;
Times Online&lt;br /&gt;
Sat, 07 Jun 2003 14:30 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
If it had hit Central London, Britain would no longer have a capital
city. The force of the meteorite that hit eastern Siberia last
September destroyed 40 square miles of forest and caused earth tremors
felt 60 miles away.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An expedition from Russia's Kosmopoisk institute has only
recently reached the site in a remote area north of Lake Baikal because
of bad weather and difficult terrain, the Interfax news agency said
yesterday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fragments of the meteorite had apparently exploded
into shrapnel 18 miles above the Earth with the force of at least 200
tonnes of TNT.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time, Russian media reported that villagers 60 miles
away had witnessed a gigantic fireball screeching down from the sky,
causing windows to rattle and house lights to swing as they were hit by
blast waves on September 25. There were no reported casualties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong style="color: red;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flashback:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/n03met7.htm"&gt;200 Tons of TNT Falls on Taiga&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
FarShores News&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 03 Aug 2003 14:31 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
According to Yekaterina Shestakova, a town hall official, the
expedition consists of five people, three scientists from the Moscow
Meteorite Committee and two from Irkutsk. The expedition will go down
the Vitim river from Bodaibo to the village of Vitimsky, from where it
will proceed on foot to the place where the mysterious celestial body
is presumed to have fallen.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be recalled that a large bolide entered the atmosphere
over the villages of Vitimsky and Mama, in the Mama-Chuya district, on
the night of September 24-25, 2002, at an angle of 32 degrees over the
horizon and an altitude of 60 kilometers. Then there was a flash at 30
kilometers above the earth's surface which was registered by Americans.
According to the U.S. military, the explosion occurred at 58o 13.6,
s.l. and 113o 27.6, e.lat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A team from Yekaterinburg is already working in the
area: Twelve scientists and undergraduates are exploring the area where
the U.S. satellite registered a second point of the bolides path at an
altitude of 30 kilometers, canvassing eyewitnesses and finding numerous
traces of the bolide.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of July yet another team of Irkutsk scientists, led
by Sergei Yazev, director of the Irkutsk University Astronomic
Laboratory, will arrive at the Mama-Chuya district. "All four
expeditions will be working independently," Sergei Yazev said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We want to study different sections of the bolides flight
path." The scientists are especially interested in the virtually
unexplored area - from the point where the bolide was registered by the
U.S. satellite (30 kilometers over the earths surface) and the place
where it presumably fell to the ground. Scientists believe that this
area is 30 kilometers to 50 kilometers northeast of that point.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Samples of the snow taken in the area of the meteorites fall
were found to contain remnants of meteorite substance - particles of
iron, nickel, and chrome that are usually present in meteorites.
Furthermore, particles of enstatite, nifeline, and cristobalite were
discovered. The last mentioned element is a modification of ordinary
quartz that has been subjected to high temperature impact. This rarely
happens on earth. In addition, cristobalite and nifeline virtually
never occur together. "It seems that a fairly large bolide exploded in
the atmosphere," Sergei Yazev says. "It had a 200-ton TNT equivalent.
There is nothing to suggest that the body that blew up was man-made -
no trace of rocket fuel or increased radiation level or elements of
metal structures. Apparently it was a stone or iron-and-stone bolide.
Its dimensions have yet to be established."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to eyewitness accounts, a huge star left a shining
curve in the sky, falling somewhere in the cone-shaped hills. The
dazzling flash lit up the taiga for a few seconds, as though bathing it
in electric light, whereupon came an explosion, so powerful that
windows were shattered in houses for dozens of kilometers around.
Meteorites are usually given the name of the nearest populated area. It
so happens that in 1902, a Bodaibo meteorite was found in the same
area. The Sikhote-Alin meteorite fell in 1947. The Chulym bolide
dropped on Siberia in February 1986.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bolide flights were accompanied by a strong induction
effect, with household electric bulbs and electronic equipment burning
out. Presumably, similar phenomena occurred prior to the fall of the
Tunguska meteorite. The moment the Vitim body fell, Georgy Kaurtsev, a
Mama airport security officer, ran out into the street: "When the sound
of the explosion came, a bulb went on although the switch was in the
off position. I put on a jacket and rushed out. There is a
meteorological station near the building. It is fenced off with wire
mounted on 12 wooden poles. I saw balls of light, 20 to 30 centimeters
in diameter, shining atop every one of them. Before long, they went
out, but there was no trace left on the poles in the morning."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the scientists will find the place where the meteorite
fell, and study it. Scientists believe it is critical to learn more
about the nature of these "space aliens" in expectation of a more
serious meteorite strike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Moscow News&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090924143506.htm"&gt;Scientists See Water Ice In Fresh Meteorite Craters On Mars&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ScienceDaily&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:08 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27041/full/090924143506_large.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="mars crater ice" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27041/medium/090924143506_large.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Earlier
and later HiRISE images of a fresh meteorite crater 12 meters, or 40
feet, across located within Arcadia Planitia on Mars show how water ice
excavated at the crater faded with time. The images, each 35 meters, or
115 feet across, were taken in November 2008 and January 2009.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
NASA's
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has revealed frozen water hiding just below
the surface of mid-latitude Mars. The spacecraft's observations were
obtained from orbit after meteorites excavated fresh craters on the Red
Planet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists controlling instruments on the orbiter found bright
ice exposed at five Martian sites with new craters that range in depth
from approximately half a meter to 2.5 meters (1.5 feet to 8 feet). The
craters did not exist in earlier images of the same sites. Some of the
craters show a thin layer of bright ice atop darker underlying
material. The bright patches darkened in the weeks following initial
observations, as the freshly exposed ice vaporized into the thin
Martian atmosphere. One of the new craters had a bright patch of
material large enough for one of the orbiter's instruments to confirm
it is water-ice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The finds indicate water-ice occurs beneath Mars'
surface halfway between the north pole and the equator, a lower
latitude than expected in the Martian climate.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This ice is a relic of a more humid climate from perhaps just
several thousand years ago," said Shane Byrne of the University of
Arizona, Tucson.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Byrne is a member of the team operating the orbiter's High
Resolution Imaging Science Experiment, or HiRISE camera, which captured
the unprecedented images. Byrne and 17 co-authors report the findings
in the Sept. 25 edition of the journal Science.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We now know we can use new impact sites as probes to look for
ice in the shallow subsurface," said Megan Kennedy of Malin Space
Science Systems in San Diego, a co-author of the paper and member of
the team operating the orbiter's Context Camera.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a typical week, the Context Camera returns more than
200 images of Mars that cover a total area greater than California. The
camera team examines each image, sometimes finding dark spots that
fresh, small craters make in terrain covered with dust. Checking
earlier photos of the same areas can confirm a feature is new. The team
has found more than 100 fresh impact sites, mostly closer to the
equator than the ones that revealed ice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An image from the camera on Aug. 10, 2008, showed apparent
cratering that occurred after an image of the same ground was taken 67
days earlier. The opportunity to study such a fresh impact site
prompted a look by the orbiter's higher resolution camera on Sept. 12,
2009, confirming a cluster of small craters.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Something unusual jumped out," Byrne said. "We observed
bright material at the bottoms of the craters with a very distinct
color. It looked a lot like ice."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bright material at that site did not cover enough area for
a spectrometer instrument on the orbiter to determine its composition.
However, a Sept. 18, 2008, image of a different mid-latitude site
showed a crater that had not existed eight months earlier. This crater
had a larger area of bright material.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We were excited about it, so we did a quick-turnaround
observation," said co-author Kim Seelos of Johns Hopkins University
Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md. "Everyone thought it was
water-ice, but it was important to get the spectrum for confirmation."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Project Scientist Rich Zurek, of
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., said, "This mission
is designed to facilitate coordination and quick response by the
science teams. That makes it possible to detect and understand rapidly
changing features."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ice exposed by fresh impacts suggests that NASA's Viking
Lander 2, digging into mid-latitude Mars in 1976, might have struck ice
if it had dug 10 centimeters (4 inches) deeper. The Viking 2 mission,
which consisted of an orbiter and a lander, launched in September 1975
and became one of the first two space probes to land successfully on
the Martian surface. The Viking 1 and 2 landers characterized the
structure and composition of the atmosphere and surface. They also
conducted on-the-spot biological tests for life on another planet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327271.300-asteroid-attack-putting-earths-defences-to-the-test.html"&gt;Asteroid attack: Putting Earth's defences to the test&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
David Shiga&lt;br /&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:46 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
It looks inconsequential enough, the faint little spot moving leisurely
across the sky. The mountain-top telescope that just detected it is
taking it very seriously, though. It is an asteroid, one never seen
before. Rapid-survey telescopes discover thousands of asteroids every
year, but there's something very particular about this one. The
telescope's software decides to wake several human astronomers with a
text message they hoped they would never receive. The asteroid is on a
collision course with Earth. It is the size of a skyscraper and it's
big enough to raze a city to the ground. Oh, and it will be here in
three days.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;object width="486" height="412" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="flashObj"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&amp;amp;publisherID=981571807" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=41841503001&amp;amp;playerID=2227271001&amp;amp;domain=embed&amp;amp;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" height="412" width="486"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Far-fetched it might seem, but this scenario is all too plausible.
Certainly it is realistic enough that the US air force recently brought
together scientists, military officers and emergency-response officials
for the first time to assess the nation's ability to cope, should it
come to pass.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They were asked to imagine how their respective organisations
would respond to a mythical asteroid called Innoculatus striking the
Earth after just three days' warning. The asteroid consisted of two
parts: a pile of rubble 270 metres across which was destined to splash
down in the Atlantic Ocean off the west coast of Africa, and a
50-metre-wide rock heading, in true Hollywood style, directly for
Washington DC.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exercise, which took place in December 2008, exposed the
chilling dangers asteroids pose. Not only is there no plan for what to
do when an asteroid hits, but our early-warning systems - which could
make the difference between life and death - are woefully inadequate.
The meeting provided just the wake-up call organiser Peter Garreston
had hoped to create. He has long been concerned about the threat of an
impact. "As a taxpayer, I would appreciate my air force taking a look
at something that would be certainly as bad as nuclear terrorism in a
city, and potentially a civilisation-ending event," he says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The latest space rock to put the frighteners on us was 2008
TC3. This car-sized object exploded in the atmosphere over Sudan in
October last year. A telescope first spotted it just 20 hours before
impact - at a distance of 500,000 kilometres - and astronomers say we
were lucky to get any warning at all.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thankfully, 2008 TC3 was far too small to do any damage on the
ground, but we are nearly as blind to objects big enough to do serious
harm. We have barely begun to track down the millions of
skyscraper-sized asteroids zipping around Earth's neighbourhood, any
one of which could unleash as much destructive power as a nuclear bomb
on impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asteroid impacts are not as rare as you might think. It is
widely accepted that an asteroid or comet 30 to 50 metres across
exploded over Tunguska in Siberia in 1908, flattening trees for dozens
of kilometres all around. The chance of a similar impact is about 1 in
500 each year (&lt;em&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.nature.com/uidfinder/10.1038/4531178a"&gt;Nature&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.nature.com/uidfinder/10.1038/4531178a"&gt;, vol 453, p 1178&lt;/a&gt;). Put another way, that's a 10 per cent chance of an impact in the next 50 years (see &lt;em&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327271.300-asteroid-attack-putting-earths-defences-to-the-test.html?full=true#bx272713B1"&gt;Should we panic?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Fifty-metre asteroids scare me to death," says Timothy Spahr, director
of the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "&lt;strong&gt;I could easily see a 50-metre object hitting in three days causing absolute pandemonium&lt;/strong&gt;."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the US air force planning exercise, the participating scientists
explained that with so little warning there would be no hope of
preventing an impact. Even Innoculatus's smaller 50-metre asteroid
would weigh hundreds of thousands of tonnes, requiring an enormous push
to change its trajectory appreciably - so much so that detonating a
nuke near it in space would not provide a sufficient impulse so late in
the game to cause a miss. To deflect an asteroid sufficiently, force
would need to be applied years in advance (see &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327271.300-asteroid-attack-putting-earths-defences-to-the-test.html?full=true#bx272713B2"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Could we nuke it?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, it could make things worse by breaking the asteroid into
pieces, some of which could be large enough to do damage, and even
create a blizzard of meteors that would destroy satellites in Earth
orbit.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Panic on the streets&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Realistically, though, the nuclear option would not be on the
table in the first place: the nuclear-tipped missiles sitting patiently
in silos around the world are not designed to track and home in on an
asteroid or even survive for more than a few minutes in space. Instead,
we would simply have to brace ourselves for the impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The good news is that even a little warning makes a big
difference, simply because it would allow us to predict the time and
location of impact. In the case of 2008 TC3, just a few hours after the
asteroid's discovery, NASA scientists completed calculations that
predicted an atmospheric plunge over an unpopulated desert area of
northern Sudan, with timing accurate to within a minute.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But participants in the planning exercise worried that if an
asteroid posing an imminent threat to a populated area were discovered,
and the situation were not handled properly, panic and lack of
coordination could lead to chaos on the roads.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spahr was not involved in the exercise, but shares those
concerns. "With a three-day warning, you can walk away and be safe. But
it scares me, given how poorly we've handled things of this nature in
the past," he says, citing the failure to fully evacuate New Orleans
ahead of hurricane Katrina in 2005. "I'm picturing people panicking and
driving the wrong way on the freeway, screaming 'Oh my god, it's going
to kill us!'"
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To prevent panic and disorganised movement, it is crucial for
authorities to develop an evacuation plan and communicate it to the
public as soon as possible after discovery of the dangerous object,
since such discoveries are posted automatically online and would cause
a media firestorm.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such measures should ensure the streets would be very quiet as
an object such as Innoculatus plunges into the atmosphere and makes its
final approach to Washington DC. The compression of the atmosphere in
front of the asteroid and friction with the air would cause rapid
heating. At lower altitudes, where the air is denser, the heating
becomes so intense that the asteroid vaporises and explodes. For the
Tunguska event, this happened at about 8 kilometres above ground.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Supersonic shock wave&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you were unfortunate enough to be looking up from directly
below, the explosion would be brighter than the sun. The visible and
infrared radiation would be strong enough to make anything flammable
ignite, says Mark Boslough of Sandia National Laboratory in Livermore,
California. "It's like being in a broiler oven," he says. Anyone
directly exposed would quickly be very badly burned.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even before the sound of the blast reaches you, your body
would be smashed by a devastating supersonic shock wave as the
explosion creates a bubble of high-pressure air that expands faster
than the speed of sound. Planetary scientist Jay Melosh of Purdue
University in New York once experienced a shock wave from an experiment
that exploded 500 tonnes of TNT, a tiny blast in comparison with the
blast from an asteroid. "I was standing on top of a hill about 1.5
kilometres away wearing earplugs," he recalls. Melosh says you would
see the shockwave in the air due to the way it refracts light. "It's a
shimmering bubble," he says. "It spreads out in complete silence until
it reaches you, then you hear a double boom."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Melosh was at a safe distance, but at ground zero below an
exploding asteroid, the shock wave would be powerful enough to knock
down buildings. It would arrive about 30 seconds after the blazing hot
flash of light, and could also knock any nearby planes out of the sky,
Boslough says. Any surviving buildings would be pummelled by raging
winds blowing faster than any hurricane can muster.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, two-thirds of Earth's surface is ocean. While our
atmosphere is likely to protect us from asteroids smaller than 100
metres across, anything larger hitting the ocean - including chunks of
Innoculatus's rubble pile - would cause a giant splash that could smash
coastal buildings with high-speed volleys of water. The tremendous
damage and loss of life that would ensue if multiple cities around an
ocean basin were flooded led NASA scientists in 2003 to rate ocean
impacts by asteroids as far more dangerous than those on or over land.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recent computer simulations offer some hope, though. They
suggest that the monster waves generated by ocean impacts would
typically break far from shore, dissipating most of their energy before
they could reach cities - unless the impact was very close to the
coast, of course. Another ray of hope is that 100-metre asteroids hit
Earth only about one-tenth as often as 30-metre objects.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lasting just one day, the 2008 US air force exercise could
barely scratch the surface of the incoming-asteroid problem. Not
surprisingly, it discovered that should the nightmare come true, there
is no plan for how to coordinate the activities of NASA, emergency
planners, the US military and other parts of government. Further
planning exercises are needed: the time saved through early preparation
will be crucial if an evacuation is ever required at short notice.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our chance of having any prior warning at all for an
approaching 30-metre asteroid is no better than 25 to 35 per cent with
existing sky surveillance, calculates astronomer Alan Harris of the
Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado. &lt;strong&gt;The
sun washes out half of the sky with daylight, blinding us to 50 per
cent of threatening objects. Even glare from the moon can hide
unwelcome incoming guests.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's more, two of the world's three leading asteroid surveys are
based in Arizona, including the Catalina Sky Survey, which discovered
2008 TC3. The region tends to cloud over between July and September.
"Shift 2008 TC3 back to July and forget it. It wouldn't have been
seen," says Spahr.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now picture this ugly scenario, which worried some
participants in the air force exercise: an asteroid flies out of
nowhere and explodes over a sensitive nuclear-armed region, like
South-East Asia or the Middle East. There's a reasonable chance that
such an airburst could be misinterpreted as a nuclear attack. Both
produce a bright flash, a blast wave and raging winds.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such concerns were one reason why, when NASA found 2008 TC3 in
its sights, it not only issued a press release but also alerted the US
State Department, military commanders, and White House officials, says
Lindley Johnson at NASA headquarters, who oversees the agency's work on
near-Earth objects. "If it had been going down in the middle of the
Pacific somewhere, we probably would not have worried too much more
about it, but since it was [going to be] on land and near the Middle
East, we did our full alerting," he says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is one major way to improve our prospects - point more
eyes at the skies. The European Space Agency wants to get into the
monitoring game and may set its telescopes at the European Southern
Observatory in Chile on the problem. This could fill a gap in the
NASA-funded surveys, which are limited to watching the skies of the
northern hemisphere, says Richard Crowther of the UK's Science and
Technology Facilities Council, who is a consultant for ESA and heads a
United Nations working group on near-Earth objects.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Be prepared&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Up to now, the US has taken the majority of the responsibility
for dealing with this issue and I think it's time for other states to
take on a more equitable share of that," he says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help will also come from two new US observatories designed to
survey the entire sky visible from their locations every few days. The
Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS), will
consist of four 1.8-metre telescopes, the first of which is already up
and running in Hawaii. Plans are afoot to construct the 8.4-metre Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope in Chile by 2015, though the project is still
raising funds. These will improve the chances of an early detection and
potentially extend warning times for 30-metre objects to more than a
month. But even so, every ground-based lookout suffers from
interference from the sun and moon.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A dedicated space telescope would fix this problem, but such a
mission could cost more than a billion dollars. "We're talking about
investing in an insurance policy," says Irwin Shapiro of the
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shapiro is leading a US National Research Council panel that
by year's end will recommend a strategy to better address the threat
from near-Earth objects. That study, along with the air force's report
on its asteroid impact exercise, is intended to help the White House
develop an official policy on the near-Earth object hazard by October
2010, which Congress has requested.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While asteroid impacts are much rarer than hurricanes and
earthquakes, they have the potential to do much greater damage, Johnson
warns: "It's not something I think there needs to be billions of
dollars per year spent on, but it does warrant some priority in the
list of things that we ought to be worried about." The cash would at
least give us a better idea of when the next asteroid might strike. &lt;strong&gt;"From what we know today," he says, "it could be next week."&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;For a more in-depth study, read &lt;em&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/151954-Meteorites-Asteroids-and-Comets-Damages-Disasters-Injuries-Deaths-and-Very-Close-Calls"&gt;Meteorites, Asteroids, and Comets: Damages, Disasters, Injuries, Deaths, and Very Close Calls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://momento24.com/en/2009/09/28/shock-and-surprise-as-space-object-falls/"&gt;Cosmic shock and awe: Fireball explodes over Argentina&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Momento24&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:27 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27159/full/meteoro.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Fireball over Argentina" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/27159/medium/meteoro.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Notilucent clouds following fireball over Argentina&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday afternoon the inhabitants of Mendoza, La Pampa, San Luis,
and Cordoba saw a meteorite coming down the sky. It finally
desintegrated with a loud explosion before it hit the earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The object, which initially scared the residents, was seen
yesterday in the General Alvear Department. It could be a meteorite or
space junk, but the place where it fell isn't known, according to what
the Copernicus Institute said today.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 18.30 there was a cloud in the sky and the explosion was
felt almost by all people, asaid Julio Alcaraz, police officer of Santa
Isabel, a town located 320 kilometers west of Santa Rosa and 40 miles
south of the border with Mendoza.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief of the Copernicus Institute, Jaime Garcia, said that
"by the color, it would apparently be a meteorite." He added that "the
meteorite's location is unknown but according to the information
collected it wouldn't have landed on Mendoza". &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He defined meteorite as "any space object that wanders among the planets, the stars, and that enters the atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was like a fireball," commented several neighbors to a local radio
last night. Some Pampean residents said they photographed it and sent
to it to the local media. In fact what is seen is a trail in the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The object fell in the middle of the field in an area of
300,000 hectares which is uninhabited. The risks of fire outbrakes was
immediately ruled out as it had been snowing all day long and it was
very humid.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Civil Defense chief of the commune, Roberto Trigues,
confirmed that the raking "was held from 20 up to 23hs. They could
establish the hypothetical triangulation with the apex at Punta del
Agua, Agua Escondida and Chocico or Santa Isabel, a little more to the
South, which would be the impact zone.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This explosion is produced before hitting the earth and
logically, as it is an important explosion, it produces a blast of air
which causes the shaking of glasses in the houses.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Trigues said that this is a very large area, so "I would say it might be hard to find something".
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jaime Garcia, amateur astronomer in charge of the Copernicus
Institute in San Rafael, said "nothing can be confirmed until an object
is found, but we can say that according to testimonies, it is very
likely to be a metal object such as a meteor."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zOueHmQyUy8&amp;amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;amp;hl=es&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" width="425"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.malverngazette.co.uk/news/4657309.Strange_fireball_seen_in_night_sky/" target="_blank"&gt;UK: Strange Fireball Seen in Night Sky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Malvern Gazette&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:19 EDT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A Bosbury man who witnessed a strange light in the sky on Saturday night is wondering if anyone else saw the same thing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Beard saw the orange glow at around 9.45pm to 10pm as he was standing outside his rural home.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said: "I was at my back door looking east, and to my left, appearing
above the tops of houses was a large fireball, a tenth the size of the
moon."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said it was orange and moved through the sky for about two
or three minutes in a north-south direction. It then slowly started to
fade and then disappear, fading out before it had reached the horizon
in the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said he had found news reports on the Internet of
similar object being seen in Essex at about the same time on the same
night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I've seen shooting stars and it didn't have the trail you see with them, but it was very, very bright," he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;A Service of &lt;a href="http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/"&gt;Signs of the Times&lt;/a&gt;: The most comprehensive, objective and reliable Alternative News Source on the Web. If you aren't reading &lt;a href="http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/"&gt;SOTT&lt;/a&gt;, you don't know what's REALLY happening!&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8385115091808825739-3765460013290661940?l=fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com/2009/09/september-2009.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keit)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385115091808825739.post-8803249618798901291</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-05T04:42:01.324Z</atom:updated><title>August 2009</title><description>&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/08/scunthorpe-1st-august-2009/"&gt;England: Scunthorpe - 'Fireball' spotted with parts falling off and all 'flowing' in the same direction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UK UFO Sightings&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:34 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; August 2, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; August 1st 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 10pm
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Witness Statement:&lt;/span&gt; I was stood in my
garden having a fag and iI saw like a fire ball in the sky. I thought
it was a plane on fire because it looked like parts of it had fallen
off still on fire but they did not fall to the ground, they all flowed
the same westerly direction. I believe it was any explanation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1729962/the_perseids_are_coming/index.html?source=r_space"&gt;The Perseids Are Coming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190446-The-Perseids-Are-Coming#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Red Orbit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:11 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Space Weather" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24841/full/ff1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24841/medium/ff1.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Space Weather&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Looking
northeast around midnight on August 11th-12th. The red dot is the
Perseid radiant. Although Perseid meteors can appear in any part of the
sky, all of their tails will point back to the radiant. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Earth
is entering a stream of dusty debris from Comet Swift-Tuttle, the
source of the annual Perseid meteor shower. Although the shower won't
peak until August 11th and 12th, the show is already getting underway.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't get too excited, cautions Bill Cooke of NASA's Meteoroid
Environment Office. "We're just in the outskirts of the debris stream
now. If you go out at night and stare at the sky, you'll probably only
see a few Perseids per hour."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will change, however, as August unfolds.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Earth passes through the densest part of the debris stream
sometime on August 12th. Then, you could see dozens of meteors per
hour."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For sky watchers in North America, the watch begins after
nightfall on August 11th and continues until sunrise on the 12th.
Veteran observers suggest the following strategy: Unfold a blanket on a
flat patch of ground. Lie down and look up. Perseids can appear in any
part of the sky, their tails all pointing back to the shower's radiant
in the constellation Perseus. Get away from city lights if you can. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is one light you cannot escape on August 12th.
The 55% gibbous Moon will glare down from the constellation Aries just
next door to the shower's radiant in Perseus. The Moon is beautiful,
but don't stare at it. Bright moonlight ruins night vision and it will
wipe out any faint Perseids in that part of the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon is least troublesome during the early evening hours
of August 11th. Around 9 to 11 p.m. local time (your local time), both
Perseus and the Moon will be hanging low in the north. This low profile
reduces lunar glare while positioning the shower's radiant for a nice
display of Earthgrazers.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Earthgrazers are meteors that approach from the horizon and
skim the atmosphere overhead like a stone skipping across the surface
of a pond," explains Cooke. "They are long, slow and colorful - among
the most beautiful of meteors." He notes that an hour of watching may
net only a few of these at most, but seeing even one can make the whole
night worthwhile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.marstoday.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=31962"&gt;Possible Meteorite Imaged by Opportunity Rover on Mars&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190450-Possible-Meteorite-Imaged-by-Opportunity-Rover-on-Mars#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Mars Today&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:57 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
This image of "Block Island" was taken on July 28, 2009, with the front
hazard-identification camera on NASA's Mars Exploration Rover
Opportunity.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24847/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24847/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Opportunity rover has eyed an odd-shaped, dark rock, about 0.6
meters (2 feet) across on the surface of Mars, which may be a
meteorite. The team spotted the rock called "Block Island," on July 18,
2009, in the opposite direction from which it was driving. The rover
then backtracked some 250 meters (820 feet) to study it closer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24844/full/ff4.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24844/medium/ff4.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists will be testing the rock with the alpha particle X-ray
spectrometer to get composition measurements and to confirm if indeed
it is a meteorite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/"&gt;3D Debris On Jupiter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190508-3D-Debris-On-Jupiter#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Space Weather&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:14 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A dark cloud of debris from the July 19th impact on Jupiter continues
to be visible through backyard telescopes. Now, for the first time, you
can see it in 3D. Cross your eyes and behold:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© Wah!" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24888/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24888/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Wah!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Astrophotographer
"Wah!" made the stereo pair using an 8-inch telescope in Hong Kong. He
took two pictures of Jupiter four minutes apart, allowing the planet's
rotation to provide the necessary right- and left-eye views. If you
have trouble seeing the 3D effect, try staring at &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/swpod2009/02aug09/Wah1.jpg?PHPSESSID=21daru3u5g1jl777hmiohus695"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; larger version.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 3D, the impact mark seems to be a hole in the clouds. In fact, it is
a cloud, filled with dark cindery bits of a mystery-impactor that
exploded like 2000 megatons of TNT. High altitude winds are spreading
the debris around the south pole, enlarging the dark mark for easy
viewing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amateur astronomers can monitor the cloud near Jupiter's
System II longitude 210°. For the predicted times when it will cross
the planet's central meridian, add 2 hours and 6 minutes to &lt;em&gt;Sky and Telescope's&lt;/em&gt; predicted transit times for Jupiter's Great Red Spot. [&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/images2009/20jul09/skymap_north.gif?PHPSESSID=uh241jempides3mea4tg82ggl0"&gt;sky map&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/08/090805-earth-oceans-comets-life.html"&gt;Comet Swarm Delivered Earth's Oceans?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190759-Comet-Swarm-Delivered-Earth-s-Oceans-#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Ker Than&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
National Geographic News&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:00 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Nicolle Rager-Fuller, NSF" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25057/full/090805_earth_oceans_comets_life.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Comet" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25057/medium/090805_earth_oceans_comets_life.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Nicolle Rager-Fuller, NSF&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;A comet slams into what is now Chesapeake Bay in an artist's conception.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
A barrage of comets may have delivered Earth's oceans around 3.85 billion years ago, a new study suggests.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists have long suspected that Earth and its near neighbors were
walloped by tens of thousands of impactors during an ancient event
known as the Late Heavy Bombardment.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pummeling disfigured the moon, leaving behind massive
craters that are still visible, preserved for millennia in the moon's
airless environment. But it's been unclear whether the impactors were
icy comets or rocky asteroids.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, based on levels of a certain metal in ancient Earth
rocks, a team led by Uffe Jorgensen of the Niels Bohr Institute in
Denmark says comets were the culprits.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether Earth had oceans &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; any comets arrived has been intensely debated, Jorgensen noted.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some experts say enough water could have existed from the moment Earth
formed, while others argue that the young planet's heat would have
vaporized any liquids.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's the kind of subject that can make scientists fight physically with one another," Jorgensen said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His team thinks early Earth was just too hot to retain large
bodies of water. But by the time of the Late Heavy Bombardment, things
had cooled down, allowing meltwater from the flurry of comets to become
the world's first seas.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We may sip a piece of the impactors every time we drink a
glass of water," the study authors write in their paper, which will be
published in an upcoming issue of the journal Icarus.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Comets' Metal&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jorgensen and colleagues arrived at this conclusion after
measuring the levels of iridium in surface and near-surface rocks from
Greenland - some of the oldest known rocks in the world, dating back to
the time of the bombardment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iridium is a scarce metal on Earth, but it's relatively common in comets and asteroids.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the team's calculations, iridium levels in the rocks
around an asteroid impact should be about 18,000 parts per trillion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A comet impact, meanwhile, should leave behind only about 130 parts per
trillion. That's because comets would carry less metal, since they're
mostly made of loosely packed water ice with some rocky debris.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comets also strike Earth at higher speeds, because of their longer orbits around the sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, "the explosion formed by a comet is more violent
than from an asteroid, and the amount of material - including iridium -
thrown back into space is larger," Jorgensen said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team found that the Greenland rocks contained about 150
parts per trillion of iridium, supporting the idea that comets were the
main players in the Late Heavy Bombardment.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All that ice from the comet swarm then thawed to create a
global ocean more than half a mile (about a kilometer) deep, the team
calculates.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moon, meanwhile, lacks an ocean because its gravity is
much weaker than Earth's, so most if not all of the debris from a comet
strike would be thrown back into space, Jorgensen said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Nicolas Dauphas, a geophysicist at the University of
Chicago, isn't yet convinced that the bombardment featured comets, not
asteroids.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new study, he said, relies on too many estimates - such as the predicted amount of iridium deposited following an impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I am afraid [they have] stretched their conclusions too far," Dauphas said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Accidental Life?&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandra Wickramasinghe, an astrobiologist at Cardiff University
in the U.K. not involved in the new study, also supports the theory of
an ancient comet bombardment.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And he thinks it's possible that comets seeded Earth not only with water but with life.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to some controversial studies, the oldest evidence
for life on Earth dates back to about 3.85 billion years ago, around
the time of the Late Heavy Bombardment, he noted.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It could be a coincidence, but to me it would be a remarkable coincidence," Wickramasinghe said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Study co-author Jorgensen is inclined to agree.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The [Late Heavy Bombardment] was an accident," he said. "If it
had not happened, there would have been no water on Earth, and no
life."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/newsfeatures.cfm?release=2259"&gt;Triple asteroid system passes by Earth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190816-Triple-asteroid-system-passes-by-Earth#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
NASA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:13 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA/JPL/GSSR" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25080/full/neo_20090806_640.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Near-Earth asteroid 1994 CC" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25080/medium/neo_20090806_640.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA/JPL/GSSR&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Radar
imaging at NASA's Goldstone Solar System Radar on June 12 and 14, 2009,
revealed that near-Earth asteroid 1994 CC is a triple system.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Radar
imaging at NASA's Goldstone Solar System Radar on June 12 and 14, 2009,
revealed that near-Earth asteroid 1994 CC is a triple system. Asteroid
1994 CC encountered Earth within 2.52 million kilometers (1.56 million
miles) on June 10. &lt;strong&gt;Prior to the flyby, very little was known about this celestial body&lt;/strong&gt;.
1994 CC is only the second triple system known in the near-Earth
population. A team led by Marina Brozovic and Lance Benner, both
scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.,
made the discovery.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1994 CC consists of a central object about 700 meters (2,300
feet) in diameter that has two smaller moons revolving around it.
Preliminary analysis suggests that the two small satellites are at
least 50 meters (164 feet) in diameter. Radar observations at Arecibo
Observatory in Puerto Rico, led by the center's director Mike Nolan,
also detected all three objects, and the combined observations from
Goldstone and Arecibo will be utilized by JPL scientists and their
colleagues to study 1994 CC's orbital and physical properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next comparable Earth flyby for asteroid 1994 CC
will occur in the year 2074 when the space rock trio flies past Earth
at a distance of two-and-a-half million kilometers (1.6 million miles).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the hundreds of near-Earth asteroids observed by radar, only about 1 percent are triple systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA12165"&gt;Mars Rover takes picture from Meteorite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190817-Mars-Rover-takes-picture-from-Meteorite#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
nasa.gov&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:20 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25081/full/PIA12165_fig1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="'Block Island' Meteorite on Mars" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25081/pod/PIA12165_fig1.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;'Block Island' Meteorite on Mars. Left-eye view of stereo pair&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Composition measurements by NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity confirm that this rock on the Martian surface is an &lt;strong&gt;iron-nickel&lt;/strong&gt; meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image combines exposures from the left eye and right eye of the
rover's panoramic camera to provide a three-dimensional view when seen
through red-green glasses with the red lens on the left. The camera
took the component images during the 1,961st Martian day, or sol, of
Opportunity's mission on Mars (July 31), after approaching close enough
to touch the rock with tools on the rover's robotic arm. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have informally named the rock "Block
Island." With a width of about two-thirds of a meter (2 feet), it is
the largest meteorite yet found on Mars. Opportunity found a smaller
iron-nickel meteorite, called "Heat Shield Rock" in late 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.space.com/spacewatch/090807-perseid-meteors.html"&gt;Perseid Meteor Shower Might Dazzle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190888-Perseid-Meteor-Shower-Might-Dazzle#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Joe Rao&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
SPACE.com&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:27 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25114/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25114/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
For
Northern Hemisphere observers, August is usually regarded as "meteor
month," with one of the best displays of the year reaching its peak
near midmonth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That display is, of course, the annual Perseid Meteor Shower,
beloved by everyone from meteor enthusiasts to summer campers. This
year is expected to produce an above average number of "shooting stars"
that could offer a rewarding experience to skywatchers around the
globe.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's just one problem: A bright moon will drown out fainter meteors.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moon will be at last quarter the night of Aug. 13 and it
will be at a rather bright waning gibbous phase a night or two earlier,
seriously hampering observation of the peak of the Perseids, predicted
to occur late on the nights of Aug. 11 and 12.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moonrise on Aug. 11 comes at around 10:20 p.m., while on Aug.
12 it's around 10:50 p.m. The moon will be hovering below and to the
left of the Great Square of Pegasus these nights and not all that far
from the constellation Perseus, from where the meteors will appear to
emanate (hence the name "Perseid").
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perseus, does not begin to climb high up into the northeast
sky until around midnight; by dawn it's nearly overhead. But bright
moonlight will flood the sky through most of those two key nights and
will certainly play havoc with any serious attempts to observe these
meteors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Shower already underway&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Perseids are already around, having been active only in a very weak
and scattered form since around July 17, as is typically the case for
this annual shower.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a noticeable upswing in Perseid activity traditionally
begins during the second week of August, leading up to their peak. They
are typically fast, bright and occasionally leave persistent trains.
And every once in a while, a Perseid fireball will blaze forth, bright
enough to be quite spectacular and more than capable to attract
attention even in bright moonlight.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, because the moon was also at full phase on Aug.
5 it will always be above the horizon during the predawn morning hours
(when Perseid viewing is best) in the days leading up to the peak. So
even the gradual increase in the shower will be spoiled by moonlight.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moon arrives at last quarter on Aug. 13 and thereafter its
light becomes much less objectionable, but by that time the peak of the
display has passed, leaving only a few lingering Perseid stragglers in
its wake.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But nonetheless, the 2009 Perseids will be still be worth watching.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Comet crumbs&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know today that these meteors are actually the dross of the
Swift-Tuttle comet. Discovered back in 1862, this comet takes
approximately 130 years to circle the sun. And in much the same way
that the Tempel-Tuttle comet leaves a trail of debris along its orbit
to produce the spectacular Leonid Meteors of November, the Swift-Tuttle
comet produces a similar debris trail along its orbit to cause the
Perseids.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, every year during mid-August, when the Earth passes
close to the orbit of Swift-Tuttle, the material left behind by the
comet from its previous visits, ram into our atmosphere at
approximately 37 miles (60 kilometers) per second and create bright
streaks of light in our midsummer night skies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And according to two meteor researchers, each working independently,
2009 could turn out to be an unusually intense Perseid year.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mikhail Maslov of Russia has determined that within a matter
of several hours on the morning of Aug. 12, the Earth will come close
to three trails of dust shed by the Swift-Tuttle comet from three prior
visits to the vicinity of the Sun (in 1610, 1737 and 1861). All three
encounters will all occur within a roughly 4-hour time frame between 4
and 8 hours UT, which will be particularly favorable for eastern North
America where this interval corresponds to midnight to 4 a.m. on Aug.
12; the constellation of Perseus will be gradually climbing the
northeast sky during this time frame.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Maslov, the Earth will be passing only 87,000
miles (140,000 km) from the center of the 1610 trail at 8:07 UT (4:07
a.m. EDT).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the absence of moonlight, an observer might see up to 200
meteors per hour around that time, a number that sadly - because of the
bright moon - won't in 2009. Overall, though, the Perseids might still
put on a good display despite the interfering moonlight, with at least
the brighter meteors being visible to patient observers.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another researcher, Jeremie Vaubaillon of Caltech, used a
computer simulation to depict Earth's passage through the Perseids in
2009. Vaubaillon's simulation clearly shows Earth encountering
significant meteor activity from about 0 hours UT on Aug. 12 through
about 6 hours UT on Aug. 13, possibly suggesting better than average
Perseid activity worldwide for both the late-night hours of Aug. 11 and
Aug. 12, local times.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Is it safe?&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many years ago, a phone call came into New York's Hayden
Planetarium. The caller sounded very concerned after hearing a radio
announcement of an upcoming Perseid display and wanted to know if it
would be dangerous to stay outdoors on the peak night of the shower
(perhaps assuming there was a danger of getting hit by cosmic debris).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These meteoroids, however, are no bigger than sand grains or
pebbles, have the consistency of cigar ash and are consumed dozens of
miles above our heads. The caller was passed along to the Planetarium's
then-Chief Astronomer, Dr. Kenneth L. Franklin (1923-2007).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin quickly allayed any fears by cheerfully commenting
that there are only two dangers from watching for Perseid meteors:
getting drenched with dew and falling asleep!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top10_perseidsfacts.html"&gt;Top 10 Perseid Meteor Shower Facts&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.space.com/spacewatch/meteor_forecast.html"&gt;Meteor Watching 101: Tips and terms&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagegallery/igviewer.php?imgid=2752&amp;amp;gid=212&amp;amp;index=0"&gt;Perseid Meteor Gallery 2004, 2006&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/"&gt;Jupiter Impact Cloud Has Split Into Three Clouds&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190889-Jupiter-Impact-Cloud-Has-Split-Into-Three-Clouds#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Space Weather&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:52 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Debris from the July 19th mystery-impact on Jupiter has split into
three clouds. The trifurcation is evident in this August 7th image
taken by Rick Schrantz using a 10-inch telescope at his backyard
observatory in Nicholasville, Kentucky:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© Rick Schrantz" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25115/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25115/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Rick Schrantz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other observers have noticed the same thing. "There appear to be 3
distinct impact scars now, somewhat linear in shape and perhaps larger
than previous days," reports Joel Warren of Amarillo, Texas. He took &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/submissions/large_image_popup.php?image_name=Joel-Warren-08-07-090615_1249677953.jpg"&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; pictures using an 8-inch telescope.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jupiter's upper atmosphere is a dynamic place. The cindery impact
debris appears to be caught up in a cascade of turbulent swirls and
eddies, which is literally ripping the cloud apart. Amateur astronomers
can monitor what happens next: The impact is located near Jupiter's
System II longitude 210°. For the predicted times when it will cross
the planet's central meridian, add 2 hours and 6 minutes to &lt;em&gt;Sky and Telescope's&lt;/em&gt; predicted &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.skyandtelescope.com/skytel/beyondthepage/41085997.html"&gt;transit times&lt;/a&gt; for Jupiter's Great Red Spot.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
more images: from &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/submissions/large_image_popup.php?image_name=Mike-Salway-20090805_1552-MikeSalway-16_1249584749.jpg"&gt;Mike Salway&lt;/a&gt; of Central Coast, NSW Australia; from &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/submissions/large_image_popup.php?image_name=Raffaello-Lena-evolution-august_1249641912.jpg"&gt;Raffaello Lena&lt;/a&gt; of Rome, Italy; from Alphajuno of League City, Texas; from &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/submissions/large_image_popup.php?image_name=Mike-Hood-M00007a-511-UT-CS-REG_1249576483.jpg"&gt;Mike Hood&lt;/a&gt; of Kathleen, Georgia, USA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://spaceweather.com/"&gt;Radio Perseids&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190890-Radio-Perseids#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Space Weather&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:05 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Awash in moonlight, the Perseid meteor shower is at present not very
easy to see. Some observers have given up on looking, choosing instead
to monitor the shower by means of radio. This plot from Dave Swan shows
how he is counting more than 300 Perseid radio echoes per hour using a
Yagi antenna and 55.25 MHz receiver in Bransgore, UK:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a title="© Dave Swan" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25116/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25116/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Dave Swan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the loudspeaker, each echo sounds like a little "ping." It is the
reflection of a distant TV transmitter from the meteor's ionized trail.
Forward scatter meteor detection, as this technique is called, is more
sensitive than ordinary visual observation. Very small meteoroids are
able to create a radio echo without leaving any trace of optical light
in the sky. That's why Swan is counting 300 radio Perseids per hour
while naked-eye observers are couting no more than about 20. Click &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.rmob.org/livedata/main.php3"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; to monitor forward scatter stations around the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/08/09/like-the-fist-of-an-angry-god/"&gt;Something punching through Saturn's F ring captured on film&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Discover Magazine&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:58 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
Phil Plait&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25164/full/cassini_fring_punch.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25164/medium/cassini_fring_punch.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Deep
in the outer realms of our solar system, well over a billion kilometers
away, something bizarre happened at Saturn's F ring.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, seriously: what the &lt;em&gt;hell&lt;/em&gt; happened here?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://ciclops.org/view/5683/Punching_through_the_F_Ring"&gt;one of the latest pictures&lt;/a&gt;
returned from the remarkable human achievement that is the Cassini
spacecraft, a probe the size of a school bus that has been orbiting the
ringed planet since 2004. It's returned one incredible picture after
another, and lately - as Saturn's orbit has brought it to a point where
the rings are nearly edge-on to the Sun - things have gotten not only
spectacular but also really &lt;em&gt;weird.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rings
are incredibly thin, only a few meters in thickness despite being
hundreds of thousands of kilometers across. Over the past few months,
as the Sun shines almost straight into the rings (instead of down on
them), every bump and irregularity sticks out like, well, like a tree
in the desert. Weird gravitational effects from Saturn's fleet of moons
tune and resonate the countless particles making up the rings, &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/11/saturns-rings-do-the-wave/"&gt;creating beautiful waves and ripples&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But this, this is something new.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-right"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25165/full/cassini_fring_punch_zoom.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25165/pod/cassini_fring_punch_zoom.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It's
not exactly clear what's going on here, even in this slightly zoomed
shot. But it looks for all the world - or worlds - like some small
object on an inclined orbit has punched through Saturn's narrow F ring,
bursting out from underneath, and dragging behind it a wake of
particles from the rings. The upward-angled structure is definitely
real, as witnessed by the shadow it's casting on the ring material to
the lower left. And what's with the bright patch right where this
object seems to have slammed in the rings? Did it shatter millions of
icy particles, revealing their shinier interior material, making them
brighter? Clearly, &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt; awesome and amazing happened here.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My first inclination (haha! &lt;em&gt;Inclination!&lt;/em&gt; As always, I
slay me) is to say that there isn't enough material in the rings to
create what amounts to a hydrodynamic wake behind a moving object. When
you move through air you leave a wake behind you, but there are
gazillions of particles per cubic centimeter in the Earth's air at sea
level. I would think that even in Saturn's ring, the density of
particles wouldn't be enough to support a phenomenon like &lt;em&gt;this.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But apparently, I'm wrong. Without doing a full-blown hydrodynamic
calculation it's hard to say what's possible and what isn't. Cassini
scientists are currently doing just that, in order to better understand
what this odd image is trying to tell us.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I have to wonder: is this a common occurrence? Is this
object on an orbit that intersects the rings so that it plunges up
through them and then again down into them every time it circles
Saturn? If so, how does that affect the rings overall, especially over
millions of years?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or was this a singular event, some small object whose orbit
was affected by a nearby massive moon, changing its path, putting it on
a collision course with Saturn's mighty and vast ring system? That
seems awfully unlikely...
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... but when it comes to this weird, weird place, I've learned
my intuition is monumentally inadequate. Nature, it turns out, has a
far greater imagination than any mere human. We are fated, I think, to
watch Nature unfold before us and try to figure it out after the fact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But oh, isn't that the joy of science?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/08/09/like-the-fist-of-an-angry-god/"&gt;Something went through Saturn's ring - like the fist of an angry god&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/191013-Something-went-through-Saturn-s-ring-like-the-fist-of-an-angry-god#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Bad Astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:04 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25215/full/5683_13340_1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25215/medium/5683_13340_1.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cassini image of something punching through Saturn’s F ring
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Deep in the outer realms of our solar system,
well over a billion kilometers away, something bizarre happened at
Saturn's F ring.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, seriously: what the &lt;em&gt;hell&lt;/em&gt; happened here?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://ciclops.org/view/5683/Punching_through_the_F_Ring"&gt;This is one of the latest pictures&lt;/a&gt;
returned from the remarkable human achievement that is the Cassini
spacecraft, a probe the size of a school bus that has been orbiting the
ringed planet since 2004. It's returned one incredible picture after
another, and lately - as Saturn's orbit has brought it to a point where
the rings are nearly edge-on to the Sun - things have gotten not only
spectacular but also really weird.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rings are incredibly thin, only a few meters in thickness
despite being hundreds of thousands of kilometers across. Over the past
few months, as the Sun shines almost straight into the rings (instead
of down on them), every bump and irregularity sticks out like, well,
like a tree in the desert. Weird gravitational effects from Saturn's
fleet of moons tune and resonate the countless particles making up the
rings, &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/11/saturns-rings-do-the-wave/"&gt;creating beautiful waves and ripples&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But this, this is something new.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not
exactly clear what's going on here, even in this slightly zoomed shot.
But it looks for all the world - or worlds - like some small object on
an inclined orbit has punched through Saturn's narrow F ring, bursting
out from underneath, and dragging behind it a wake of particles from
the rings. The upward-angled structure is definitely real, as witnessed
by the shadow it's casting on the ring material to the lower left. And
what's with the bright patch right where this object seems to have
slammed in the rings? Did it shatter millions of icy particles,
revealing their shinier interior material, making them brighter?
Clearly, &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt; awesome and amazing happened here.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My first &lt;em&gt;inclination&lt;/em&gt; (haha! Inclination! As always, I
slay me) is to say that there isn't enough material in the rings to
create what amounts to a hydrodynamic wake behind a moving object. When
you move through air you leave a wake behind you, but there are
gazillions of particles per cubic centimeter in the Earth's air at sea
level. I would think that even in Saturn's ring, the density of
particles wouldn't be enough to support a phenomenon like this.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But apparently, I'm wrong. Without doing a full-blown
hydrodynamic calculation it's hard to say what's possible and what
isn't. Cassini scientists are currently doing just that, in order to
better understand what this odd image is trying to tell us.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I have to wonder: is this a common occurrence? Is this
object on an orbit that intersects the rings so that it plunges up
through them and then again down into them every time it circles
Saturn? If so, how does that affect the rings overall, especially over
millions of years?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or was this a singular event, some small object whose orbit
was affected by a nearby massive moon, changing its path, putting it on
a collision course with Saturn's mighty and vast ring system? That
seems awfully unlikely...
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... but when it comes to this weird, weird place, I've learned
my intuition is monumentally inadequate. Nature, it turns out, has a
far greater imagination than any mere human. We are fated, I think, to
watch Nature unfold before us and try to figure it out after the fact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But oh, isn't that the joy of science?
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Perhaps,  if it doesn't come smashing on top of your head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090812/ap_on_sc/us_sci_killer_asteroids"&gt;Confession: NASA can't keep up with killer asteroids&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/191160-Confession-NASA-can-t-keep-up-with-killer-asteroids#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Seth Borenstein&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:18 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25302/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25302/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
NASA
is charged with seeking out nearly all the asteroids that threaten
Earth but doesn't have the money to do the job, a federal report says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's because even though Congress assigned the space agency
this mission four years ago, it never gave NASA money to build the
necessary telescopes, the new &lt;em&gt;National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;
report says. Specifically, NASA has been ordered to spot 90 percent of
the potentially deadly rocks hurtling through space by 2020.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, NASA says it's completed about one-third of its assignment with its current telescope system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA estimates that there are about 20,000 asteroids and comets
in our solar system that are potential threats to Earth. They are
larger than 460 feet in diameter - slightly smaller than the Superdome
in New Orleans. So far, scientists know where about 6,000 of these
objects are.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rocks between 460 feet and 3,280 feet in diameter can
devastate an entire region but not the entire globe, said Lindley
Johnson, NASA's manager of the near-Earth objects program. Objects
bigger than that are even more threatening, of course.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just last month astronomers were surprised when an object of
unknown size and origin bashed into Jupiter and created an Earth-sized
bruise that is still spreading. Jupiter does get slammed more often
than Earth because of its immense gravity, enormous size and location.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="StoryComment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;And recently Venus too: &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/189806-Smashing-days-New-bright-spot-observed-on-Venus"&gt;Smashing days! New bright spot observed on Venus&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disaster movies like "Armageddon" and near misses
in previous years may have scared people and alerted them to a serious
issue. But when it comes to doing something about monitoring the
threat, the academy concluded &lt;strong&gt;"there has been relatively little effort by the U.S. government."&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the U.S. government is practically the only government doing anything at all, the report found.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It shows we have a problem we're not addressing," said Louis Friedman,
executive director of the Planetary Society, an advocacy group.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA calculated that to spot the asteroids as required by law
would cost about $800 million between now and 2020, either with a new
ground-based telescope or a space observation system, Johnson said. If
NASA got only $300 million it could find most asteroids bigger than
1,000 feet across, he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But so far NASA has gotten neither sum.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="StoryComment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Perhaps because the US is busy spending all that money on the so-called 'wars'?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may never get the money, said John Logsdon, a space policy professor at George Washington University.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The program is a little bit of a lame duck," Logsdon said. There is not a big enough group pushing for the money, he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the moment, NASA has identified about five near-Earth
objects that pose better than a 1-in-a-million risk of hitting our
planet and being big enough to cause serious damage, Johnson said. That
number changes from time to time, usually with new asteroids added and
old ones removed as more information is gathered on their orbits.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The space rocks astronomers are keeping a closest eye on are a
430-foot diameter rock that has a 1-in-3,000 chance of hitting Earth in
2048 and a much-talked about asteroid, Apophis, which is twice that
size and has a one-in-43,000 chance of hitting in 2036, 2037 or 2069.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last month, NASA started a new Web site for the public to learn about threatening near-Earth objects.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Maybe NASA isn't keeping track of them, but &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/146682-He-s-got-the-bunker-built-now-Bill-Gates-helps-to-build-the-world-s-biggest-digital-telescope"&gt;someone is&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/186672-What-are-they-hiding-Flight-447-and-Tunguska-Type-Events"&gt;they're not gonna tell us&lt;/a&gt; when something is about to hit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=39727&amp;amp;src=eoa-iotd"&gt;Aorounga Impact Crater, Chad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/191197-Aorounga-Impact-Crater-Chad#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Earth Observatory&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:49 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25323/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="Click to enlarge" alt="Aorounga Impact Crater" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25323/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Astronaut
photograph ISS020-E-26195 was acquired on July 25, 2009, with a Nikon
D3 digital camera fitted with an 800 mm lens, and is provided by the
ISS Crew Earth Observations experiment and Image Science &amp;amp; Analysis
Laboratory, Johnson Space Center. The image was taken by the Expedition
20 crew. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Aorounga Impact Crater is located in the
Sahara Desert, in north-central Chad, and is one of the best-preserved
impact structures in the world. The crater is thought to be middle or
upper Devonian to lower Mississippian (approximately 345 - 370 million
years old) based on the age of the sedimentary rocks deformed by the
impact. Spaceborne Imaging Radar (SIR) data collected in 1994 suggests
that Aorounga is one of a set of three craters formed by the same
impact event. The other two suggested impact structures are buried by
sand deposits.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concentric ring structure of the Aorounga crater - renamed
Aorounga South in the multiple-crater interpretation of SIR data - is
clearly visible in this detailed astronaut photograph. The central
highland, or peak, of the crater is surrounded by a small sand-filled
trough; this in turn is surrounded by a larger circular trough. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Linear rock ridges alternating with light orange sand
deposits cross the image from upper left to lower right; these are
called yardangs by geomorphologists. Yardangs form by wind erosion of
exposed rock layers in a unidirectional wind field. The wind blows from
the northeast at Aorounga, and sand dunes formed between the yardangs
are actively migrating to the southwest.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image in this article has been cropped and enhanced to
improve contrast. Lens artifacts have been removed. The International
Space Station Program supports the laboratory to help astronauts take
pictures of Earth that will be of the greatest value to scientists and
the public, and to make those images freely available on the Internet.
Additional images taken by astronauts and cosmonauts can be viewed at
the NASA/JSC Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17599-earth-could-be-blindsided-by-asteroids-panel-warns.html"&gt;Earth could be blindsided by asteroids, panel warns&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/191205-Earth-could-be-blindsided-by-asteroids-panel-warns#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
David Shiga&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:00 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NEAR Project/NLR/JHUAPL/Goddard SVS/NASA" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25328/full/dn17599_1_300.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25328/medium/dn17599_1_300.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NEAR Project/NLR/JHUAPL/Goddard SVS/NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Asteroid Eros, seen here by NASA's NEAR spacecraft, is 33 kilometres wide, making it the second largest near-Earth asteroid&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Existing
sky surveys miss many asteroids smaller than 1 kilometre across,
leaving the door open to damaging impacts on Earth with little or no
warning, a panel of scientists reports. Doing better will require
devoting more powerful telescopes to asteroid hunting, but no one has
committed the funds needed to do so, it says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Near-Earth asteroids larger than 1 kilometre across could
blast huge amounts of sunlight-blocking dust into Earth's atmosphere in
an impact, causing devastating climate change. The US Congress asked
NASA in 1998 to find 90 per cent of those in this size range within 10
years, a goal that has now nearly been reached. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astronomers have now found 784 of them, mostly using
telescopes funded by NASA. That works out to 83 per cent of the 940
estimated to be out there by astronomer Alan Harris of the Space
Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But &lt;strong&gt;asteroids below 1 kilometre in size can cause
serious harm, too, and they hit Earth more frequently because they are
more numerous.&lt;/strong&gt; To address the small-asteroid threat, Congress
told NASA in 2005 to find 90 per cent of the near-Earth asteroids
larger than 140 metres across by 2020.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA asked the US National Research Council in 2008 to figure
out the best way to survey small asteroids and meet the 2020 goal. Now,
the NRC panel has issued an interim report, saying that without new
money for more powerful surveys, NASA will not be able to meet the
goal.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Surprise hit&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"To achieve this goal, or to even come close to achieving it,
new facilities capable of detecting fainter asteroids and having wider
fields of view to cover larger portions of the sky each night are
required," the report says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel leader Irwin Shapiro of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center
for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, says there is wide
agreement on this point. "Pretty well everyone agrees now that [just]
continuing with what we have, there's no way we could reach the 2020
goal," he told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report also points out that &lt;strong&gt;existing surveys are
designed to gradually build up a catalogue of near-Earth objects over
time, not to watch out for incoming asteroids that are just days or
weeks from colliding with our planet.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Small asteroids could easily slip past existing surveys unnoticed until the moment of collision&lt;/strong&gt;
because telescopes currently devoted to the task are only capable of
imaging a small part of the sky each night. And even then, clouds can
prevent them from spotting asteroids, says Timothy Spahr of the Minor
Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, a central clearinghouse for
asteroid and comet data.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;'No free lunch'&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asteroids approaching from the direction of the sun would also
be missed, at least by ground-based telescopes, says Alan Harris.
Sending a telescope to another vantage point in space could overcome
this problem. "[But] it could be seriously expensive," says Harris. "So
one must ask, 'What's it worth?'"
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"There is no free lunch," Shapiro agrees. But he adds, "We're talking about investing in an insurance policy."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A comet or asteroid as small as 30 metres across is thought to
have exploded in the atmosphereMovie Camera over Siberia in 1908,
unleashing hundreds of times the energy of the nuclear bomb dropped on
Hiroshima, Japan, in 1945, and flattening trees in a zone dozens of
kilometres across.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small asteroid impact in the ocean could also flood coastal
cities by triggering huge waves, though scientists are still debating
how far such waves could travel before petering out. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;See also: &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/191160-Confession-NASA-can-t-keep-up-with-killer-asteroids"&gt;Confession: NASA can't keep up with killer asteroids&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stardust/news/stardust_amino_acid.html"&gt;NASA Researchers Make First Discovery of Life's Building Block in Comet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/191509-NASA-Researchers-Make-First-Discovery-of-Life-s-Building-Block-in-Comet#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Bill Steigerwald&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:06 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© NASA/JPL " target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25511/full/361283main_sd_comet_2400x3000.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/25511/pod/361283main_sd_comet_2400x3000.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA/JPL &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This
is an artist's concept of the Stardust spacecraft beginning its flight
through gas and dust around comet Wild 2. The white area represents the
comet. The collection grid is the tennis-racket-shaped object extending
out from the back of the spacecraft.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
NASA scientists
have discovered glycine, a fundamental building block of life, in
samples of comet Wild 2 returned by NASA's Stardust spacecraft.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Glycine is an amino acid used by living organisms to make
proteins, and this is the first time an amino acid has been found in a
comet," said Dr. Jamie Elsila of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in
Greenbelt, Md. "Our discovery supports the theory that some of life's
ingredients formed in space and were delivered to Earth long ago by
meteorite and comet impacts." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elsila is the lead author of a paper on this research accepted for publication in the journal &lt;em&gt;Meteoritics and Planetary Science&lt;/em&gt;.
The research will be presented during the meeting of the American
Chemical Society at the Marriott Metro Center in Washington, DC, August
16.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The discovery of glycine in a comet supports the idea that
the fundamental building blocks of life are prevalent in space, and
strengthens the argument that life in the universe may be common rather
than rare," said Dr. Carl Pilcher, Director of the NASA Astrobiology
Institute which co-funded the research.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proteins are the workhorse molecules of life, used in
everything from structures like hair to enzymes, the catalysts that
speed up or regulate chemical reactions. Just as the 26 letters of the
alphabet are arranged in limitless combinations to make words, life
uses 20 different amino acids in a huge variety of arrangements to
build millions of different proteins.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stardust passed through dense gas and dust surrounding the icy
nucleus of Wild 2 (pronounced "Vilt-2") on January 2, 2004. As the
spacecraft flew through this material, a special collection grid filled
with aerogel - a novel sponge-like material that's more than 99 percent
empty space - gently captured samples of the comet's gas and dust. The
grid was stowed in a capsule which detached from the spacecraft and
parachuted to Earth on January 15, 2006. Since then, scientists around
the world have been busy analyzing the samples to learn the secrets of
comet formation and our solar system's history.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We actually analyzed aluminum foil from the sides of tiny
chambers that hold the aerogel in the collection grid," said Elsila.
"As gas molecules passed through the aerogel, some stuck to the foil.
We spent two years testing and developing our equipment to make it
accurate and sensitive enough to analyze such incredibly tiny samples."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, preliminary analysis in the Goddard labs detected
glycine in both the foil and a sample of the aerogel. However, since
glycine is used by terrestrial life, at first the team was unable to
rule out contamination from sources on Earth. "It was possible that the
glycine we found originated from handling or manufacture of the
Stardust spacecraft itself," said Elsila. The new research used
isotopic analysis of the foil to rule out that possibility.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isotopes are versions of an element with different weights or
masses; for example, the most common carbon atom, Carbon 12, has six
protons and six neutrons in its center (nucleus). However, the Carbon
13 isotope is heavier because it has an extra neutron in its nucleus. A
glycine molecule from space will tend to have more of the heavier
Carbon 13 atoms in it than glycine that's from Earth. That is what the
team found. "We discovered that the Stardust-returned glycine has an
extraterrestrial carbon isotope signature, indicating that it
originated on the comet," said Elsila.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team includes Dr. Daniel Glavin and Dr. Jason Dworkin of
NASA Goddard. "Based on the foil and aerogel results it is highly
probable that the entire comet-exposed side of the Stardust sample
collection grid is coated with glycine that formed in space," adds
Glavin.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The discovery of amino acids in the returned comet sample is
very exciting and profound," said Stardust Principal Investigator
Professor Donald E. Brownlee of the University of Washington, Seattle,
Wash. "It is also a remarkable triumph that highlights the advancing
capabilities of laboratory studies of primitive extraterrestrial
materials."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The research was funded by the NASA Stardust Sample Analysis
program and the NASA Astrobiology Institute. NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the Stardust mission for NASA's
Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Lockheed Martin Space Systems,
Denver, developed and operated the spacecraft. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/071/S71448.html"&gt;Canada: Ontario - Two huge balls of fire traveling east&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Peter Davenport&lt;br /&gt;
NUFORC&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Occurred: &lt;/span&gt;8/1/2009 21:30 (Entered as : aug 1 2009 21:30)
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Reported:&lt;/span&gt; 8/2/2009 6:26:00 AM 06:26
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; 8/5/2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Location:&lt;/span&gt; Oakville (Canada), ON
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Shape:&lt;/span&gt; Fireball
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Duration: &lt;/span&gt;5 mins
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Two large balls of fire appearing in sky traveling east&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two bright red fireballs appeared traveling east close to Upper Middle
Road and Third Line, flying over the Abbey Park Recreation Center. Very
bright, like on fire, but looks like going east, not falling down, one
after another about 3 mins apart, then disappearing. Did not look like
a meteor, looked like huge ball of fire, very red in colour. Not an
airplane, perhaps space junk burning upon re-entry, but then why
wouldn't the fireballs continue descent to the ground, why keep going
east? Silent, no engine sounds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.argusrocks.com/blog/2009/08/25/august-24th-fireball-over-canada-possible-meteorite/"&gt;August 24th Fireball over Canada  -  Possible Meteorite?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192103-August-24th-Fireball-over-Canada-Possible-Meteorite-#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Argusrocks.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:21 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Occasionally, I like to search Twitter for &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/search?category=saved_search&amp;amp;id=1205112&amp;amp;q=meteorite+OR+meteorites&amp;amp;source=sidebar"&gt;meteorite or meteorites&lt;/a&gt;.
Last night, a bunch of people in Canada suddenly started talking about
meteorites. A large meteor was seen - also known as a fireball or
bolide.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those of us in the meteorite hobby know that when someone says
they saw a meteorite fall "nearby", it could mean almost anything -
there is a common confusion between distance and angular distance.
Still, with this many witnesses, it's certainly possible that something
reached the ground last night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below, I've compiled some of the highlights from Twitter.  I've used ellipsis to indicate multiple tweets from the same user.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;OTerry:&lt;/span&gt; Just saw a massive firery meteorite fall in north york. I wonder where it landed. It was either really big or very close.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    derekpurdy:&lt;/span&gt; Saw an amazing meteor in
the sky tonight it was lit up for a second or two. Bright Green/blue
watched it break up, amazing. #Meteor #Ontario ... it was something
else! Never seen a meteor like that. Wow, all I can say is wow. (user
is at 44.264135, -78.064328)
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    ChaiLatteAddict:&lt;/span&gt; I think I just a
meteor! It made a bang and it fell from the sky and it was
blue-ish/green-ish. Please tell me how to confirm this! ... @ptc555 I
saw it east of the west part of Montreal, so it make sense we saw the
same thing if you're in Ont. Thank god you saw it too! ... Meteor
sighting in Canada. I'm thinking about going home to watch the news all
night. I wanna know where it fell and how big it is! ... I love the
power of Twitter, we all saw something thinking we were crazy but we
talk about it and it's an amazing feeling.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    markdelete:&lt;/span&gt; i totally saw that possible meteor tonight in the sky. blue flash with red center. pretty crazy.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    jsat2028:&lt;/span&gt; @argusrocks Hi, I saw it
land! It was as high as a telephone pole when I saw it I was no more
than 20 yards away. Report it, to who? ... I could see the ripples from
the heat it was blue, looked like a force field, and the head was a
fireball.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    mackaytaggart:&lt;/span&gt; @kentboniface I work
at a talkradio station in Toronto....we're getting a lot of calls about
the meteorite. Where were you when you saw it? ... @MitchMirsky I work
@ a Toronto radio station. Getting lots of calls from listeners who
reported seeing it. May have landed in Barrie ON.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    kentboniface:&lt;/span&gt; Just saw a meteorite large enough to light up the entire sky. Looked like lightning, but not a cloud in the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    MitchMirsky:&lt;/span&gt; Driving home tonite, we saw a meteorite land about 300 yards away.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    ellehether:&lt;/span&gt; saw the most breathtaking meteor tonight! blue, green and orange! it was hugeeee!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    ptc555: &lt;/span&gt;@colorsounds you saw the
meteorite in rochester? i saw it in toronto! ... @mackaytaggart i saw
the meteorite from Etobicoke (royal york and eglinton). i was looking
north.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    colorsounds:&lt;/span&gt; Falling meteorite in #roc, burned green, about 8:50pm, very big and bright!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    LouisSabourin: &lt;/span&gt;@argusrocks I saw at about 9 pm a meteorite: very impressive from Gatineau Qc was looking south-west: Ottawa, maybe
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    M_A_R_A #meteor:&lt;/span&gt; saw a giant bal of fire at St. Clair &amp;amp; Ossington....it was awesome!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    DGConroy:&lt;/span&gt; Saw the meteor come across at Yonge and Eg... looked very close! (user is at 43.646557, -79.388714)
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    itemtrader:&lt;/span&gt; I just the the meteor to ! thought i was crazy  -  it was bright
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    craigebrown:&lt;/span&gt; I too saw a meteor flash across the sky. Very quick, very bright.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    vdiddy1103:&lt;/span&gt; I just saw a shooting
star...or a comet...or a meteor. I wish Astronomy wasn't boring as f -
, maybe I would have learned something.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    sarahhp89: &lt;/span&gt;May Have Just Seen Some Sort Of Meteor Flash :0 Stoked!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    fadersmusic: &lt;/span&gt;Decided to go
investigate am old haunted hotel called the regal constellation and
witnessed a very impressive meteor fireball in the skies
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    ChrisDawe:&lt;/span&gt; Holy poo. Just saw what had to be a meteor burning up over Toronto! Anyone else see it?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    CopySix:&lt;/span&gt; Just saw a small meteorite (shooting star) come down from my Barrie backyard  -  so close you could actually 'hear' it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    nevdawg:&lt;/span&gt; @ChaiLatteAddict I saw it from Milton, just south of Toronto. Pretty incredible.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    BenTFleming:&lt;/span&gt; holy s - , I just saw a meteor crash.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    memories_music:&lt;/span&gt; Just saw a meteorite!!!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;    dvasmusique:&lt;/span&gt; holy shit comet in
toronto! #toronto ... yeah i saw it ... spectacular ... i was on my way
to District 9 and i saw it over my apt. building on queen near
bellwoods
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So, will anything be found?  It couldn't hurt to look!  If anyone has more information about this sighting, please &lt;a target="_blank" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/noah@argusrocks.com"&gt;contact me&lt;/a&gt;.  If anything is found, I'm going to call this "the Twitter meteorite".&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ufosnw.com/sighting_reports/2009/grandrapidsmi08212009/grandrapidsmi08212009.htm"&gt;Red Fire Ball Hovers &amp;amp; Then Bolts Out of Sight&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192126-Red-Fire-Ball-Hovers-Then-Bolts-Out-of-Sight#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
UFOs Northwest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:36 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; August 21, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; 5:30 AM PDT
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Location of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; Grand Rapids, Michigan
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt; I walked passed my balcony
doors to see what looked like a big red fire ball hovering in the sky
over Grand Rapids near the Ford Airport. I grabbed my digital camera
and it's battery which was charging as I put the battery in my camera
the object turned slightly side ways and then bolted out of sight. It
moved so fast I didn't have time to snap one darn picture. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Note:&lt;/span&gt; A hovering
fire ball that bolts out of sight isn't easily explainable. It is too
bad that the witness wasn't able to get a photo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/gloucestershireheadlines/Meteor-seen-Cheltenham/article-1291542-detail/article.html"&gt;England: Meteor seen above Cheltenham&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192225-England-Meteor-seen-above-Cheltenham#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
This is Gloucestershire&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A church worker believes he has photographed a meteor blazing a trail above Cheltenham.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthew Pinless, 31, from Fairview, spotted the fast-moving object in
the sky while walking along Glenfall Street in Cheltenham at about 5pm
on Tuesday.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said: "I was walking along the road with my young son and I spotted this object moving through the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"At first I thought it was a plane, but then I could see it was moving too quickly for that.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I managed to grab my phone and take a photograph, but it disappeared behind a cloud and never came out the other side.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I don't subscribe to the UFO theory, so I am fairly sure it
was a meteor, but I would be interested to hear if anybody else saw it
in the sky."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/2810742/Fiery-meteor-sighted"&gt;'Fiery' meteor sighted in New Zealand&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192128-Fiery-meteor-sighted-in-New-Zealand#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Shahra Walsh&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Press&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:18 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A fiery meteor blazed a trail through the skies this morning, with sightings reported from Christchurch to Rotorua&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zoe Battersby was out for an early walk along Jimmy Amers beach in
Kaikoura at around 6.10am when she noticed a "very large meteor".
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was very bright - the size of a streetlight. It looked like it fell into the sea," she said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alan Gilmore, resident superintendent of the University of
Canterbury Mt John Observatory said meteors enter the atmosphere over
New Zealand "several times a year" but he doubted that the rock made it
to the ground or water level.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This meteor is very typical, and often they burn up at about
70kms up. It's very rare for them to actually land. They are coming
into a thicker atmosphere, traveling at 30km a second. The friction is
strong and they slow up and start to break up. It's like throwing a
stone at a concrete path," he said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmore said as the meteor breaks up, witnesses often see a bright flash known as a 'terminal fireball'.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said meteors "burning up coming through air - white hot with
friction - start to glow". Meteors could be seen from as far as 100kms
up and could be seen from almost 1000kms away.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"They are spectacular, often a bright white centre which is
the actual rock, - a tiny, brilliant star - with a teardrop-shaped glow
that's brilliant emerald green caused by the oxygen and the radiation
coming off the rock," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gilmore said on the rare occasion that a meteor lands - then
becoming known as a meteorite - its arrival is often heralded with a
sonic boom caused by the temperature layers that exist closer to the
surface, below 60kms.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the range of reported sightings, Gilmore expected the meteor entered the atmosphere somewhere over the North Island.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The impression of closeness is deceptive. Because they are
bright, people think [the meteorite] landed a couple of paddocks away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/gloucestershireheadlines/Meteor-seen-Cheltenham/article-1291542-detail/article.html"&gt;England: Meteor seen above Cheltenham&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192225-England-Meteor-seen-above-Cheltenham#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
This is Gloucestershire&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A church worker believes he has photographed a meteor blazing a trail above Cheltenham.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthew Pinless, 31, from Fairview, spotted the fast-moving object in
the sky while walking along Glenfall Street in Cheltenham at about 5pm
on Tuesday.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said: "I was walking along the road with my young son and I spotted this object moving through the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"At first I thought it was a plane, but then I could see it was moving too quickly for that.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I managed to grab my phone and take a photograph, but it disappeared behind a cloud and never came out the other side.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I don't subscribe to the UFO theory, so I am fairly sure it
was a meteor, but I would be interested to hear if anybody else saw it
in the sky."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/08/pill-near-bristol-23rd-august-2009/"&gt;England:  Pill Near Bristol - Two meteroites spotted, followed by several aircraft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192381-England-Pill-Near-Bristol-Two-meteroites-spotted-followed-by-several-aircraft#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
UK UFO Sightings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:08 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; August 29, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting: &lt;/span&gt;Sunday 23rd August
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 6 am- 7am
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Witness Statement:&lt;/span&gt; It looked like 2
meteorites heading downwards at a five o'clock angle visible to the
North East with a smoke tail behind. This was at around 6am. Within 10
minutes the sky was filled with aircraft, over a dozen some leaving
contrails, two jets leaving long chemical trails. Several craft headed
directly North East and were silent and left no trail at all. All
planes seemed to be heading or situated to the West. Could it all be
related? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ufosnw.com/sighting_reports/2009/yakimawa08302009/yakimawa08302009.htm"&gt;US: Huge Green Fireball Descends From Sky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/192585-US-Huge-Green-Fireball-Descends-From-Sky#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
UFOs Northwest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:50 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; August 30, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; 12:50 AM PDT
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Location of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; Yakima, Washington
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We just saw something falling from the sky in Yakima,
Washington. At 12:50 AM my mom, my boyfriend and myself were outside in
her front yard looking through our telescope at planets. He was bent
down adjusting the lens and my mom and I were looking at the skies. All
of a sudden - out of nowhere - something fell from the skies just a
couple miles from us. We live in a nice neighborhood and didn't want to
take off racing after it so we just stood there screaming out about how
shocked we were at this sudden sighting. Normally, we would think it
was a falling star except it was not white. It was on fire and it was
smoking. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had a long green trail behind it. You could see
green and red flames trailing flames behind it. To me, it looked liked
a meteor crashing, but my boyfriend thought it might be a falling
satellite or a small plane crashing. We never actually heard a crash.
There was no noise. If you hold a dinner plate out against the sky,
that was the size of the object and it had 30 to 40 feet of flames
behind it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could it be a crashed UFO? It seemed controlled by the way it was being
steered. The sighting lasted around 20 seconds. I didn't have my camera
on me this time! It was mid fast. It was obviously on fire. It trailed
an almost straight line not like an arc like a shooting star. I am
going to watch the news. Could you keep me informed if anyone else
reports this?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Additional Report (In Response to Questions):&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was headed north to south. We lost sight at the roof of a
house on the south side (of our home). On the same note my mom and I
drove around looking for this "meterorite" which is exactly what I
thought it was, but stumbled upon something else very strange (20
minutes after the sighting). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am reviewing the pictures right now and will send them tomorrow if
there is anything to it. I want to go the same location tonight (of
possible landed object) to make sure before submitting a formal report.
I am not sure if it is even related to the "meteor". I can submit the
pictures anyway (within this e-mail) if you'd like.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Note:&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This sure sounds like a meteorite. However, no other reports
have been received. A check of the local media in the Yakima has not
revealed any other sightings. Anyone who viewed this object or has seen
"landing or crash debris" in the Yakima area is urged to file a report. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;A Service of &lt;a href="http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/"&gt;Signs of the Times&lt;/a&gt;: The most comprehensive, objective and reliable Alternative News Source on the Web. If you aren't reading &lt;a href="http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/"&gt;SOTT&lt;/a&gt;, you don't know what's REALLY happening!&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8385115091808825739-8803249618798901291?l=fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://fireballs-meteorites.blogspot.com/2009/08/august-2009.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keit)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385115091808825739.post-1878066622822256875</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-18T03:53:28.488+01:00</atom:updated><title>July 2009</title><description>&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ufosnw.com/sighting_reports/2009/longmontco07022009b/longmontco07022009b.htm" target="_blank"&gt;US: 2 See Large Fireball Break Up Into Smaller Fragments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188340-US-2-See-Large-Fireball-Break-Up-Into-Smaller-Fragments#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
UFOs Northwest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:27 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 4, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; July 2, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; 10 PM MDT
&lt;br /&gt;
Location of Sighting: Longmont, Colorado (About 20 Miles North of Denver)
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt; My partner and I were
driving East to Longmont on Highway 66 (Ute Highway) from Lyons,
Colorado and saw a giant fireball in the sky, hiding behind a large
section of storm clouds. At first I thought it was the moon, but
suddenly it came out from behind the clouds and rapidly decreased in
altitude. Once it began decreasing in altitude, it starting breaking up
into smaller pieces-- two, then three and then four. As soon as it
began breaking up, they began flying in formation to the West (thus
eliminating the option of it being a meteor due to it's trajectory).
About 30 seconds later, 4 of the pieces began falling to the ground
(each piece also had very long tails, similar to a meteor). As they
were falling, two of the pieces jutted off to the left, while the other
two jutted to the right. One by one, they fell to the ground in a
blaze. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My fiance and I smelled smoke as well around the area.
We estimated the distance between us and the phenomena to be roughly 3
miles or so to the South of us. It was certainly not fireworks due to
it's behavior. There has been nothing in the newspapers today in
reference to the occurrence.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Note:&lt;/span&gt; We received another similar report
from Longmont near the same time. Some of the above report suggests
space junk or a meteor breaking up, but the witnesses indicate that the
trajectory changed indicating the objects could have been under
intelligent control. The fact that smoke odor occurred could mean that
the object crashed. However, the odor could be due to fireworks
activity. Anyone else viewing these lights is urged to &lt;a href="http://www.ufosnw.com/report.htm" target="_blank"&gt;file a report&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/23784/" target="_blank"&gt;Comets Seeded Earth's Early Atmosphere&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Technology Review&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:21 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The
ratio of nitrogen isotopes in several comets almost exactly matches the
ratio on Earth, implying that our early atmosphere probably came from a
cometary bombardment.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Astrobiologists have long puzzled over the origin of Earth's oceans.
But they've dwelt a little less long over a related question: where
does the nitrogen in our atmosphere come from? Now a new analysis by
Damien Hutsemekers and pals at the Universite de Liege, in Belgium,
suggests an answer to both questions.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most attractive theories of the origin of our water
is that Earth was once bombarded by icy comets that left a watery
residue. The trouble is that the ratio of deuterium to hydrogen in
water on Earth is much lower than it is in the few comets we've been
able to measure it in (i.e., Halley, Hyakutake, Hale-Bopp, and C/2002
T7 LINEAR). So if these types of comets, which we know came from the
Oort Cloud, did supply Earth's water, it must have mixed with water
already on Earth that had a very low deuterium content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now Hutsemekers and co have put a different kind of
constraint on the cometary contribution by measuring nitrogen isotopes.
They say that comets must deliver water and nitrogen together (although
they don't say why), so a comparison of nitrogen isotopes can also
place limits on the amount of water that must have been delivered.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their conclusion is that "no more than a few percent of Earth's water can be attributed to comets."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But that's not the end of the story. Interestingly, they say
that the ratio of nitrogen-14 to nitrogen-15 in cyanide and hydrogen
cyanide in comets almost exactly matches that on Earth. "A significant
part of Earth's atmospheric nitrogen might come from comets," they
conclude.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's any exciting result because it implies a dual origin for our oceans and atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, the huge fly in this hypothetical ointment is that
there may well be other types of comet out there that have hydrogen to
deuterium ratios as well as nitrogen isotope ratios that more closely
match our own.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But in the meantime, the idea that comets gave us our early atmosphere is cool enough to keep us a-wonderin' for a while.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ref: &lt;a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5221" target="_blank"&gt;arxiv.org/abs/0906.5221&lt;/a&gt;: New Constraints on the Delivery of Cometary Water and Nitrogen to Earth from the 15N/14N Isotopic Ratio&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hamiltonadvertiser.co.uk/news/local-news/hamilton-news/2009/07/02/ufo-spotted-in-skies-over-whitehill-51525-24052756/" target="_blank"&gt;Scotland: UFO spotted in skies over Whitehill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188341-Scotland-UFO-spotted-in-skies-over-Whitehill#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Shirley Bartynek&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hamilton Advertiser&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:43 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A strange object was seen in the skies above Whitehill in Hamilton on Tuesday night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A young Hamilton woman captured this picture on her mobile phone of what she described to be a "fireball" at about 11pm.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Natalie Smith was dropping her friend back home in James Murdie Gardens
when she noticed the unusual-looking orange glow in the sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 20-year-old South Lanarkshire Council clerical assistant
explained: "We were both sitting inside my car when we noticed
something in the sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It looked like a fireball, like a big piece of ash,
but it was the size of a football. It had an orange glow. We sat and
watched it for a bit but when I went to drive away it disappeared
behind the trees at Whistleberry Road.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I have no idea what it was it was just a strange sight to see."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Natalie, who lives in Burnbank, headed back in her car to drop
another friend off at Eddlewood before returning home that evening.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not known if atmospheric conditions could have been responsible for the light's sudden appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/sports/stories/6513878.html" target="_blank"&gt;Meteor shower, comet highlights in July&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188245-Meteor-shower-comet-highlights-in-July#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Bernie Reim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Morning Sentinel&lt;br /&gt;
Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:32 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Summer is now upon us and this will be a good month to enjoy the sky in
spite of the short nights. The bright planets are evenly split this
month, with the gas giants Saturn and Jupiter visible in the evening
sky and our neighboring terrestrial planets, Venus and Mars, visible in
the morning sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There will be two more very exciting celestial events taking
place this month, but only one of them will be visible for us in New
England. &lt;strong&gt;The
annual Delta Aquarid Meteor Shower will peak during the morning hours
of July 28. This shower actually begins around the middle of July and
blends right into the famous Perseid Meteor Shower, which starts at the
end of July and peaks on August 12.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caused by Comet Machholz, you can expect around 15 to 20 Delta Aquarids
per hour that morning. The moon will be first quarter and will set
around midnight. Meteor showers are usually better after midnight,
anyway, since that is when the earth is spinning directly into the
meteors, like snowflakes on the front windshield of your car during a
snowstorm. The whole earth can be seen as a little spaceship
continually orbiting the sun at 18.6 miles per second, or 67,000 miles
per hour. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I remember seeing Comet Machholz, the 10th comet
discovered by Don Machholz of California, in the morning sky with
binoculars near the Pleiades in January 1996. These meteors will appear
to originate from a point in the sky in Aquarius low on the
southeastern sky just above the 17th-brightest star in the sky named
Fomalhaut, located 25 light years from Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When you look at that star this summer, remember that the very
first planet ever seen directly in visible light was just found
orbiting this star using the Hubble Space Telescope late last year. It
is a Jupiter-sized planet that orbits Fomalhaut at a much greater
distance than Jupiter is from our sun since it takes that planet,
called Fomalhaut B, about 872 years to orbit its parent star. It was
found just inside the edge of a huge disk of dust, and it was predicted
to exist there for a while, since they studied this star for eight
years before they finally found its planet in visible light.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The other major event will be a total eclipse of the sun. That will happen July 22 over India and China. &lt;/strong&gt;The
narrow shadow cone of the moon will sweep across the earth that day
starting just north of Mumbai, India, continuing over Bhutan and across
southern China exiting in Shanghai, the biggest city in China with 20
million people.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhutan, located on the rooftop of the world next to Nepal, is
a very interesting country that has successfully balanced modernization
with preserving ancient culture and the environment under the guiding
philosophy of Gross National Happiness. It's the only country in the
world to actually measure this elusive human quality.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least one member of our astronomy club, The Astronomical
Society of Northern New England, will be going to China for this
eclipse, so I will update you next month on what they experienced. Try
to catch this eclipse live on the NASA channel or a live feed on the
Internet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I remember seeing the last total solar eclipse live on the
NASA channel from Mongolia at 7 a.m. last Aug. 1. Actually being there
to experience a total eclipse of the sun and physically standing in the
shadow of the moon, our only natural satellite is one of the most
exciting and memorable experiences in astronomy anyone could ever have.
The next total solar eclipse happens on July 11, 2010, right over
Easter Island in the south Pacific, and the next one in this country
doesn't happen until Aug. 21, 2017.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saturn is beginning to sink into the western horizon and will
be setting by 10 p.m. Through a telescope you will notice that the
angle of its rings is getting ever thinner, reaching just 2 degrees
from horizontal by the end of the month. Look for a slender waxing
crescent moon to glide under Regulus and Saturn about 30 minutes after
sunset from July 23 to 25.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jupiter begins the month rising by 11 p.m. and ends the month
rising by 9 p.m., just after sunset. The King of the Planets will rise
at sunset by the middle of August, when it reaches opposition. Jupiter
continues to get a little brighter and closer each night until that
time. Notice that you can see its four large Galilean moons with just a
pair of good binoculars.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rest of the planetary action takes place in our morning
sky about one hour before sunrise. Orange Mars can be seen just below
the Pleiades and brilliant Venus is below and to the left of our other
neighbor, and just to the left of Aldebaran, an orange star in Taurus.
Venus is 100 times brighter than Mars and over 3 times as large in our
sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Mars is slowly getting closer and brighter and Venus
is getting less bright and farther away, even though it is getting more
illuminated by the sun now, similar to a waxing gibbous moon. Watch the
drama in the morning sky between July 17 and 19 as a waning crescent
moon drifts through the Pleiades right above Mars and Venus.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Friday. The earth is at aphelion or farthest from the sun at
10 tonight. Our orbit around the sun traces an elliptical shape, but it
is not very different from a circle since we will be just 3.3 percent
farther from the sun now than we are in January. Our seasons are caused
by the 23.5-degree tilt of the earth and not our distance from the sun.
The waxing gibbous moon will pass very close to Antares tonight. If you
were in Hawaii, you would see the moon cover this bright star tonight
around midnight. Antares, a red supergiant star, is the 16th-brightest
star in the sky and one of the largest stars in our whole galaxy of 200
billion stars. Antares is 700 times the diameter of our sun and 10,000
times brighter than our sun. Antares is 600 light years away, but if
you could place it were our sun is in the sky, the orbit of Earth and
even Mars would be inside the star below the surface.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;July 7.&lt;/span&gt; Full moon is at 5:21 a.m. This is also called the Hay or Thunder Moon.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;July 9.&lt;/span&gt; Jupiter will be near the moon
tonight and the next night in the constellation of Capricornus. Through
a small telescope you can see Neptune just to the north-northwest.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;July 15.&lt;/span&gt; Last quarter moon is at 5:53 p.m.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;July 16. &lt;/span&gt;On this day in 1994, the first
fragment of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 hit Jupiter. After that 20 more
mile-wide fragments plowed into Jupiter's gas surface during the next
six days, one hitting about every six hours. I watched through a
telescope as five of those 21 fragments hit Jupiter, but since they
actually hit on the far side of Jupiter, I could not see them until
about 30 minutes later as they rotated into view. One of many surprises
that these impacts created were the large and easily visible (even in a
small telescope) earth-sized black spots that remained visible for many
months after the original impacts.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;July 21.&lt;/span&gt; New moon is at 10:35 p.m.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;July 28.&lt;/span&gt; First quarter moon is at 6 p.m. and the Delta Aquarid meteor shower peaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://ufoinfo.com/sightings/uk/090606a.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;England: A50, Meir/Longton, Stoke-on-Trent - A Fireball-Like Object&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188475-England-A50-Meir-Longton-Stoke-on-Trent-A-Fireball-Like-Object#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
John Hayes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UFOINFO&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:16 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 5, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date:&lt;/span&gt; June 6 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 11pm
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of witnesses:&lt;/span&gt; 4
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of objects:&lt;/span&gt; 1
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Shape of objects:&lt;/span&gt; Fireball/bright light
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Weather Conditions:&lt;/span&gt; Small amount of cloud
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt; A fast moving fireball like
object moving in direct path over the A50, seen on two occasions with a
full car of people with me. At first we thought it was an aircraft on
fire, it almost looked as though the light emitted from the object was
passing through and searching the clouds, I dunno. It was moving in a
straight line but the light appeared to flicker, but it's path did not
falter. Light was not coming from a direct source or visible light or
led, like a glowing ball almost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://ufoinfo.com/sightings/ireland/090607.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;Ireland: Drom, Leap, County Cork - A Luminous Oval Orange Light with Rays Radiating from It&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188479-Ireland-Drom-Leap-County-Cork-A-Luminous-Oval-Orange-Light-with-Rays-Radiating-from-It#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
John Hayes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UFOINFO&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:15 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 5, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date:&lt;/span&gt; June 7 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 12.20am
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of witnesses: &lt;/span&gt;1
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of objects:&lt;/span&gt; 1
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Shape of objects:&lt;/span&gt; Oval orange radiating orange light
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Weather Conditions:&lt;/span&gt; Dark, with some cloud, but with the moon illuminating the sky behind thin cloud to the left of my field of vision.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt; I live overlooking a bay, so
always have my curtains open. A light in the sky caught my eye as I got
up to go to another room. I looked more closely, as I once saw a
meteorite entering the atmosphere at around the same point a couple of
years ago (although that was in December). This light, however, was
luminously orange, and of an oval shape with rays of orange light
radiating from it. Its intensity was constant. It hovered, some
distance across the bay, and seemed to be still for some moments. I
then noticed that when it did move, the movements were purposeful, and
not at all random. It moved vertically, horizontally, and diagonally,
although slowly without any kind of jerking. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I picked up my phone and tried to take some video
footage, but at this point the light faded into the distance. I found
your web-site on Google, as I felt I really must tell someone. I've
never seen anything like this before.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi John
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just wanted to let you know another strange thing that
happened from Saturday's incident. I tried to film the UFO on my phone,
whilst talking, and was filming for about a minute as the object faded
to the left of my field of vision. When I played the film back it had
been condensed into 3 seconds, as had my speech. Is this something you
have ever heard of before?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188383-Clues-to-origin-of-life-revealed-in-Tagish-Lake-meteorite" target="_blank"&gt;Clues to origin of life revealed in Tagish Lake meteorite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188383-Clues-to-origin-of-life-revealed-in-Tagish-Lake-meteorite#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
CBC News&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23636/full/tlm2_.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Photo by P.A. Hunt, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada."&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23636/medium/tlm2_.jpg" alt="tagish lake meteorite" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Photo by P.A. Hunt, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Photo
2:Photomicrograph in crossed polars of a portion of a polished thin
section of the Tagish Lake Meteorite. The bright areas A-E are
preserved high temperature silicate (olivine, pyroxene) 'chondrules' in
a dark matrix of clay, serpentine, magnetite, sulphide, carbonate and
phosphate etc. Object 'D' is approximately 0.3mm across. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
New
research into a meteorite that crashed into northern British Columbia
nine years ago is revealing startling clues that could help unravel the
origins of life on Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the Tagish Lake meteorite were found on a frozen lake
near the Yukon border in January, 2000, after it fell to Earth in a
spectacular blue-green fireball that was seen for hundreds of
kilometres.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers recovered parts of the still-frozen meteorite
after an extensive search. Since then, scientists have repeatedly tried
to unlock the clues that the rare 4.5 billion-year-old carbon and water
rich meteorite has long been suspected to contain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, a team at the University of Alberta has found
some important material nestled inside the rock, formic acid - the key
ingredient in bee stings, ant venom and stinging nettles.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U of A scientist Chris Herd says similar molecules on much,
much earlier meteorites may have been instrumental in kick-starting
life on Earth, making the meteorite the most important rock ever found
on Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Four billion years ago, when the Earth had kind of cooled off
from its initial hot state, and there was liquid water on the surface,
we may have had an influx of meteorites like Tagish Lake [that]
delivered the right mix of molecules to the Earth's surface," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How exactly that mix might have turned into actual life is
still a mystery, but Herd said the findings of formic acid on the
meteorite may provide important clues.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's a type of molecule known as a carboxylic acid. So it's
sort of like the shortest, smallest molecule in that group. The longer
molecules in this same group are actually what life uses in building
cell walls."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2001, U.S. exobiologist Sandra Pizzarello, who was studying
some of the fragments from the Tagish meteorite at Arizona State
University, said they contained almost no amino acids but did contain
high concentrations of hydrocarbon molecules, along with a type of clay
that forms in the presence of water.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, Mike Zolensky, a cosmic mineralogist at the NASA
Space Centre in Texas, said tiny bubbles in the rock were organic
globules where the universe's earliest life forms could have been able
to live.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wgal.com/news/19966650/detail.html" target="_blank"&gt;US: Large meteor fireball creates sonic boom over Pennsylvania&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188532-US-Large-meteor-fireball-creates-sonic-boom-over-Pennsylvania#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
WGAL.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:42 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23730/full/19970109_480X360.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23730/pod/19970109_480X360.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
A
number of viewers throughout the Susquehanna Valley have contacted News
8 about a bright light they saw in the night sky, and an explosion they
heard and felt early Monday morning.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"At approx. 1:05 a.m. my wife and I were outside enjoying the
cool evening and we saw a bright flash of light and a few seconds later
we heard a series of explosions. Do you have any information on that?"
read one.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I just wanted to report something very strange. At about 1:10
AM while laying in bed. We heard and felt a deep rumble, the house
shook and we felt either an explosion shock wave or an earth quake,"
read another. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
News 8 has been looking into the reports and contacted
a member of the American Meteor Society, Robert Lunsford, who said it
was likely a "fireball," a brighter than normal meteor. Lunsford also
said it was likely larger than a normal meteor.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I now have 15 reports of this object," he said. "It is most
certainly a fireball, one that survived low enough to have produced a
sonic boom and produce possible fragments on the ground (meteorites)
near its end point."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunsford said he received reports from Pennsylvania, New York,
New Jersey, and Maryland. No confirmed impact site has yet been found,
according to Lunsford.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People in our u local forum have said they saw the fireball in
Adams County, Lancaster County, Lebanon County, York County, and even
in Chester County. Some say it lit the whole night sky. You can read
those reports &lt;a href="http://ulocal.wgal.com/service/displayDiscussionThreads.kickAction?as=62692&amp;amp;w=176116&amp;amp;d=268210&amp;amp;widgetId=140513" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2009/07/a_masondixon_meteor.html" target="_blank"&gt;US: Meteor over Maryland and Pennsylvania&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188534-US-Meteor-over-Maryland-and-Pennsylvania#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Frank Roylance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Baltimore Sun&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:44 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23728/full/firebal2.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© flickr.com"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23728/medium/firebal2.jpg" alt="fireball" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© flickr.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
We
have been receiving reports today of a likely meteor over north-central
Maryland and southern Pennsylvania early Monday morning. (Not the one
in the Flickr.com image seen here.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are the first reports we have received. If you heard or saw
something similar, around the same time, please leave a comment.
Include the time, your location, which direction you saw the object or
flash, a description of what you saw, and note any boom or other sound
you heard, as well as the time lapse between flash and boom.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The York Dispatch:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In York
County, Pa., police officers from Penn Township, Southwestern Regional
and Newberry Township reported seeing a flash and hearing a boom around
1:15 a.m. Monday, July 6, according to local 911 centers. Officials in
Harford County, Md. also reported seeing a flash and hearing a boom
near the Mason-Dixon Line. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Capital Gazette&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/span&gt; An Annapolis
city police officer reported that she and her partner both saw what she
described as a "bright blue light in the sky" just after midnight. It
was followed by "a light with a tail, falling from the sky," according
to our informant. Annapolis police reported hearing a similar report on
Baltimore County police radio. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Gary Moon, reporting to &lt;em&gt;The Sun's &lt;/em&gt;News Tips:&lt;/span&gt;
"I heard and felt a deep earth blast similar to an earthquake, which
shook my home in Glen Rock, Pa., early Monday morning. I thought I
would hear MUCH more about this one ... nothing."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Deborah Markow, Havre de Grace: &lt;/span&gt;"Last
night, couldn't sleep, went out on back deck, laid on lounge, eyes
closed and then it was like someone pointed a flash light in my eyes it
was so bright. I saw another one streak through the sky ... It was one
of the most thrilling sights to behold a ball of fire flying through
the sky."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not yet seen any meteor reports of this event on the &lt;a href="http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireball/fireball_log2009.html" target="_blank"&gt;American Meteor Society's Fireball Sightings&lt;/a&gt;
Log, but it's early yet, and this fireball, coming in the wee hours
after a long holiday, probably did not catch many people out and about.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Which makes reports like these, and yours, all the more important.&lt;/strong&gt; If you saw this object, be sure to leave a &lt;a href="http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireball/report.html" target="_blank"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; with the AMS, too.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But judging from the descriptions, it almost certainly was a
fireball, which is simply an especially bright meteor, vaporizing with
an impressive flash.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a pretty good example on &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGWaQMoZoQY&amp;amp;feature=related" target="_blank"&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are sometimes followed by a sonic boom, which would
explain the booming noises in the reports. Some fireball observers -
though none yet for this event - also report a crackling or hissing
sound that is concurrent with the meteor's flash and which has never
been fully explained scientifically.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although meteor rates begin to pick up in July, this is not
the peak time for any particular meteor shower. It seems likely this
was a "sporadic," or isolated meteor that just happened to be
especially big and bright. Big ones like this are always unexpected,
always startling to witness, and always a thrill.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/07/great-sankey-warrington-4th-july-2009/" target="_blank"&gt;England: Great Sankey, Warrington - Orange Glow Like a Flame Arcing Across the Sky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UK UFO Sighting Reports&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:38 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 9, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; Saturday 4th July 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 10:50pm
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Witness Statement:&lt;/span&gt; We were watching the
tv on Saturday the 4th July 2009 when at 10.50pm we had a loud knock on
the door. It was our neighbour who said to come and have a look at the
sky. When we looked there was an orange glow, almost like a flame
arcing across the sky from West to East, at some speed but with no
noise. As this disappeared, another one would appear, in total 14, had
been seen by our neighbour, then later one was seen going South to
North exactly the same. This was over Great Sankey, Warrington. I took
a video on my camera, but not very good quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://articles.lancasteronline.com/local/4/239661" target="_blank"&gt;US: Video of Meteor shooting across Pennsylvania&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188803-US-Video-of-Meteor-shooting-across-Pennsylvania#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Jane Holahan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Lancaster Online&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:28 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
If you saw a bright flash of light in the sky about 1 a.m. Monday, it wasn't a leftover firework. It was a meteor.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And a pretty impressive one at that.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qD0pTwVFSwg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Michael Gaines, who lives near the Costco on Hempstead Road, had gotten
home from the Long's Park Patriotic Concert a few hours earlier and saw
the flash from his porch.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With an interest in astronomy, Gaines knew that it wasn't a stray Fourth of July sparkler.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was a lot brighter than fireworks," said Gaines, who
realized he was seeing the fireball of a large meteor. "You could see
remnants, little fragments - something was moving from right to left
across the sky." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mike Smith of the North Museum, who writes the Cosmic
Mike column for this newspaper, said Gaines was not alone in spotting
the sky show.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"There have been many reports of people sighting what can be called a fireball, a large (meteor)," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a story in the Baltimore Sun, geologists said that
the object would have to be a few yards in diameter to have attracted
the attention it did.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on witness descriptions, the object appeared at
approximately 1:05 a.m. and flew south to north over central Maryland
and southern Pennsylvania before vaporizing at 1:10 a.m.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One man, camping on the Susquehanna River in Delta, wrote on
the Baltimore Sun's weather blog: "It was as if it were daylight
outside. ... &lt;strong&gt;Approximately
60 to 90 seconds after the sky had lit up, we heard a thunderous series
of sonic boom sounds accompanied by tremors&lt;/strong&gt;."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gaines, along with a number of other people in Pennsylvania and Maryland, recorded what they saw on the Web site amsmeteors.org.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"For Lancastrians to be able to see a fireball, I'd say that's rare,"
Smith said. "The majority are really small and burn up before they
touch surface."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meteors, which become meteorites once they hit the ground, are
leftover debris from comets and are scattered along the comet's orbit
around the sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some meteor showers are predictable. For example, the Perseids
peaks in mid-August every year. Others, like the one spotted Monday,
are a surprise.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Quite a few reports say it came down somewhere, but I don't
know if they'll find it," Gaines said. "That's a lot of land to cover
for something that was probably the size of a fist when it landed."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intelligencer Journal/Lancaster New Era&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2009/07/meteorite_man_asks_blog_poster.html" target="_blank"&gt;Video: Meteor fell east of York, Pennsylvania on Monday morning&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/188925-Video-Meteor-fell-east-of-York-Pennsylvania-on-Monday-morning#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Frank D. Roylance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
weblogs.marylandweather.com&lt;br /&gt;
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:08 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23970/full/fireball.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© baltimoresun.com"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23970/pod/fireball.jpg" alt="Big fireball meteor" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© baltimoresun.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;The
big fireball meteor that startled residents in Central Maryland and
southern Pennsylvania early Monday morning was captured on a security
camera &lt;a href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2009/07/masondixon_meteor_turns_up_on.html"&gt; video&lt;/a&gt; in York Pa.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
"Meteorite
Man" Steve Arnold is still looking for those key eyewitness reports
that could point him toward any remnants of the July 6 Mason-Dixon
Meteor that may have survived the fall to Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arnold has read through more than 100 comments from Weather
Blog readers who saw or heard the meteor, and he's singled out more
than 30 that were detailed enough to suggest that just a little more
information might help point him to the impact zone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's Arnold below on Wednesday, kneeling in front of
the Water Co. security apparatus that captured video of the meteor as
it fell east of York, Pa. Monday morning. (&lt;a href="http://weblogs.marylandweather.com/2009/07/masondixon_meteor_turns_up_on.html" target="_blank"&gt;Click here&lt;/a&gt; to see the video.)
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23969/full/Steve_20Arnold.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© baltimoresun.com / Frank D. Roylance"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/23969/pod/Steve_20Arnold.jpg" alt="Security apparatus that captured video of the meteor" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© baltimoresun.com / Frank D. Roylance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Steve Arnold kneeling in front of the Water Co. security apparatus that captured video of the meteor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
camera itself is the dark gray object attached to the bottom of the
silver box. The videographer at right is TV producer Bob Melisso, who
is filming Arnold's search on behalf of the Science Channel program
"Meteorite Men."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what he's asking for. And below his note are the names of the commenters he wants to hear from.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those of you that saw the fireball, please reply with the following details:
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The address (including city and zip code) where you saw it?&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;What direction you were facing when seeing it?&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If you were indoors, and saw it through a window, what direction the window was facing?&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;What direction the fireball appeared to be heading from your perspective?&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If you saw the fireball burn out, could you pinpoint exactly (or close to) the direction it extinguished?&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Was there a landmark between you and the fireball that helped you
    positively pinpoint the direction it was from you when it quit burning?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;If you heard a sonic boom, how long was it between seeing the light
    and hearing the sonic boom. What other details that are relevant.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Please send the details directly to Steve at MeteorHntr@aol.com
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WeatherBlog commenters he'd like to hear from are:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Siobhan, in West Chester, Pa.; M Gaines, in Lancaster, Pa.; Matt B, in
Bel Air; Melissa Tillery, who was driving on I-70 near Hagerstown; Sam
Luther, who was camping near Delta, Pa.; John, in rural northwest
Harford, Co.; Diane, in Port Deposit; Chuck and Nikki, in Port Deposit;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Raquel, in Bergen County, N.J.; Nicole Green, in Pikesville;
Myranda Warfield, in Jefferson; Mike and Julie, in Forest Hill; DJ, in
Bel Air; Kimberly, in Forest Hill; DCD, in Littlestown, Pa.; Lisa
Ewing, in Port Deposit; Karen Haney, in Hickory, north of Bel Air;
Jenny Gresock, in Seven Valleys, Pa.;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frank Memmo, in Churchville; Ashley Simpson, in Arnold; Chris,
in Conowingo area of Cecil County; Kristen B., in Forest Hill; Dale, in
Forest Hill; Tom D., who was southbound on I-83 in York, Pa.; Matt
Bureau, in Greensburg, Pa.; Timothy Jones, in Philadelphia;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea, in Forest Hill; Terry, in Earlesville; Sue, in White Marsh; and HC, who was southbound on I-83 near Glen Rock, Pa.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. We'll keep you posted on any progress in the meteorite hunt.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And while we're on the topic, NBC on Sunday night will air yet
another movie about a meteor headed for the Earth, and beautiful
scientists racing to save the planet. It's called, "Meteor," of all
things, and it starts at 9 p.m. on WBAL Channel 11 in Baltimore.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jason Alexander ("Seinfeld's" George Castanza) is among the cast.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come back here after it's over and let's see how many scientific errors we can list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/07/wootton-northampton-12th-july-2009/" target="_blank"&gt;England: Wootton, Northampton - Ball of Fire Spotted&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UK UFO Sighting Reports&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:03 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 13, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; 12th July 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 10.14pm
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Witness Statement:&lt;/span&gt; I popped out to the
back garden for a cigarette and there was a large object in the sky
traveling very fast. It looked like a ball of fire and was traveling
approx 3 x the speed of an aeroplane. I called my girlfriend who came
out and also saw it. She thought it was an aeroplane on fire! I asked
her to run and get the camera but she took ages, I watched it move
along the sky until it was completely out of sight. Considering how
bright it was and how clearly I could see it, it must have been really
moving! There was not a cloud in the sky, I have seen many planes and
helicopters and this was definitely something I have not seen before!!
Did anyone else see this or has anyone got an explanation?? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17472-plutos-kin-may-have-invaded-asteroid-belt.html" target="_blank"&gt;Pluto's kin may have invaded asteroid belt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189198-Pluto-s-kin-may-have-invaded-asteroid-belt#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Rachel Courtland&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:28 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Millions of objects in the solar system's main asteroid belt may be icy
interlopers from beyond Neptune that were flung into their present
orbits after a violent migration of the giant planets, a new simulation
suggests.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24111/full/dn17472_1_300.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© NASA/JPL-Caltech"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24111/pod/dn17472_1_300.jpg" alt="asteroid belt" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA/JPL-Caltech&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;About 20 per cent of the objects in the main asteroid belt may have gotten their start beyond Neptune, a new simulation suggests&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
solar system's main asteroid belt is a diverse mix of objects that
orbit between Mars and Jupiter. These asteroids are generally thought
to have formed close to their present locations, so their compositions
should reflect the original distribution of gas and dust that
surrounded the sun there and eventually condensed into solid bodies.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"People have just been assuming that what we see there, formed
there," says Hal Levison of the Southwest Research Institute in
Boulder, Colorado.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Levison and others suspect some 20 per cent of the
asteroids in the belt may be comet-like objects that were born in
colder climes, beyond the orbit of Neptune. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Scattered objects&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results come from new simulations using a theory called the Nice
model, which suggests the solar system's giant planets were born closer
together and were surrounded by a vast disc of leftovers from the
planets' formation called planetesimals (see &lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7429-gas-giants-credited-for-solar-system-formation.html" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the model, Jupiter and Saturn entered a tight orbital
dance about 700 million years after the solar system formed. Their
gravity then flung Uranus and Neptune out into the planetesimal disc
like bowling balls, causing the objects there to scatter like pins.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Past simulations have tracked the trajectories of these
planetesimals and showed they wind up forming the Kuiper belt of icy
debris where Pluto sits, some of the distant satellites of Jupiter and
Saturn, and Trojan asteroids, bodies that share Jupiter's orbit but are
centred at two points ahead of and behind the planet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Outer belt&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new simulation fed planetesimals into the region
surrounding Jupiter and Saturn as the planets moved to see how many
would be captured as so-called Hilda asteroids, a group outside the
main asteroid belt that orbits the sun three times for each two orbits
of Jupiter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While some of the objects became Hildas and Trojans, most of
the captured objects wound up in the outer portion of the solar
system's main asteroid belt.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, the outer asteroid belt boasts objects that are
thought to have ice, while the inner asteroid belt is dominated by
rocky bodies. "The interpretation has been that this represents a
change in the nebula or the disc from which the planets formed,"
Levison told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Partial simulation&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But if these icy outer objects are newcomers, it would mean that
objects in the asteroid belt did not all form close to their present
locations. "It says to the community that the assumptions you've been
making don't necessarily have to be true," Levison says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Renu Malhotra of the University of Arizona in Tucson says
she's not convinced of the estimate that 20 per cent of the asteroids
in the main belt could come from the outer solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's because the new study didn't simulate the process that
knocked the planetesimals out of their original orbits - it only sent
objects from the outer solar system inwards to find out what fraction
would be captured.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's not clear how statistically probable this is," Malhotra
says. The simplest hypothesis, she adds, is that most of the asteroids
in the main belt are original residents.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journal reference: &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vol 460, p 364)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090715/sc_afp/spaceasteroids_20090715172011" target="_blank"&gt;Cosmic surprise: Many asteroids are comets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Agence France-Presse&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24123/full/capt_photo_1247677749501_1_0.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© AFP/NASA-HO/File"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24123/medium/capt_photo_1247677749501_1_0.jpg" alt="meteor streaking across the sky" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© AFP/NASA-HO/File&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This
November 2000 NASA file image shows a meteor streaking across the sky
during the Leonid meteor shower. Many of the primitive bodies wandering
the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter are former comets, tossed
out of orbit by a brutal ballet between the giant outer planets, say a
team of astrophysicists.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Many of the primitive bodies
wandering the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter are former comets,
tossed out of orbit by a brutal ballet between the giant outer planets,
say a team of astrophysicists.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A commonly accepted theory is that the asteroid belt is the
rubble left over from a "proto-planetary disk," the dense ring of gas
that surrounds a new-born star.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the orbiting rocks have long been a source of deep
curiosity. They are remarkably varied, ranging from mixtures of ice and
rock to igneous rocks, which implies they have jumbled origins.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The answer to the mystery, according to a study published by the British journal &lt;em&gt;Nature &lt;/em&gt;on Wednesday, is that a "significant fraction" of the asteroid population in fact comprises ex-comets.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Famously described as "dirty snowballs" of ice and dust, comets
are lonely, long-distance wanderers of the Solar System whose
elliptical swing around the Sun can take decades.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers in France and the United States ran a mathematical
model of the development of the early Solar System, when the planets
were accreting from clustering masses of dust and gas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to this model, the nascent giant planets --
Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune -- orbited at this time in a pretty
compact configuration, between five and 15 astronomical units (AUs)
from the Sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An AU is a standard unit of measurement for Solar System
distances. It equals the distance from the Earth to the Sun, or around
150 million kilometres (93 million miles).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the giant planets was a disk-shaped mass of comets, known as trans-Neptunian objects, between 16 and 30 AUs from the Sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the giants became bigger and bigger, their orbits became unstable.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, after around 600 million years, Uranus and Neptune were kicked out by gravitational jousting.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They rammed into the disk of comets and scattered its members
throughout the Solar System, according to this model. Many of them were
captured by the weak gravitational force of the asteroid belt, where
they remain to this day.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's a paradigm shift," said Matthieu Gounelle of France's National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in a press release.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The asteroid belt is not just a leftover from the formation of
the Solar System, but also that of violent phenomena" including the
great planetary migration.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the model is right, it implies that the difference between
the most primitive asteroids and comets is even slimmer than thought.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would also shed light on the controversial origin of
micrometeorites, or tiny extraterrestrial particles that survive the
fiery passage through Earth's atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Micrometeorites are different from meteorites in composition
and texture, and this could be explained if they derive from comets,
which are richer in organic material and crumblier than native
asteroids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090715131556.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Primitive Asteroids In Main Asteroid Belt May Have Formed Far From The Sun&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189216-Primitive-Asteroids-In-Main-Asteroid-Belt-May-Have-Formed-Far-From-The-Sun#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Science Daily&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:41 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24131/full/090715131556.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© CSNSM-Orsay-CNRS / IPEV"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24131/medium/090715131556.jpg" alt="micrometeorite" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© CSNSM-Orsay-CNRS / IPEV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Researchers collected this micrometeorite in the vicinity of CONCORDIA station in central Antarctica (Dome C, 73°S, 123°E)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Many
of the objects found today in the asteroid belt located between the
orbits of Mars and Jupiter may have formed in the outermost reaches of
the solar system, according to an international team of astronomers led
by scientists from Southwest Research Institute (SwRI).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team used numerical simulations to show that some
comet-like objects residing in a disk outside the original orbit of the
planets were scattered across the solar system and into the outer
asteroid belt during a violent phase of planetary evolution.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually, the solar system is considered a place of relative
permanence, with changes occurring gradually over hundreds of millions
to billions of years. New models of planet formation indicate, however,
that at specific times, the architecture of the solar system
experienced dramatic upheaval.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, it now seems probable that approximately 3.9
billion years ago, the giant planets of our solar system -- Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune -- rearranged themselves in a tumultuous
spasm. "This last major event of planet formation appears to have
affected nearly every nook and cranny of the solar system," says lead
author Dr. Hal Levison of SwRI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Key evidence for this event was first identified in the samples returned from the Moon by the Apollo astronauts. &lt;strong&gt;They tell us about an ancient cataclysmic bombardment where large asteroids and comets rained down on the Moon.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists now recognize that this event was not limited solely to the
Moon; it also affected the Earth and many other solar system bodies.&lt;/strong&gt;
"The existence of life on Earth, as well as the conditions that made
our world habitable for us, are strongly linked to what happened at
this distant time," states Dr. David Nesvorny of SwRI.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same dynamical conditions that devastated the planets also
led to the capture of some would-be impactors in the asteroid belt. "In
the classic movie &lt;em&gt;Casablanca&lt;/em&gt;,
everybody comes to Rick's. Apparently throughout the solar system, the
cool hangout for small objects is the asteroid belt," says Dr. William
Bottke of SwRI.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once in the asteroid belt, the embedded comet-like objects
began to beat up both themselves and the asteroids. "Our model shows
that comets are relatively easy to break up when hit by something, at
least when compared to typical asteroids. It is unavoidable that some
of the debris went on to land on asteroids, the Moon and the Earth. In
fact, &lt;strong&gt;some of the leftovers may still be arriving today&lt;/strong&gt;," says Dr. Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur in Nice, France.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team believes the surprising similarities between some
micrometeorites landing on Earth and comet samples returned by NASA's
Stardust mission are no accident. "There has been lots of debate about
the nature of micrometeorites reaching the Earth," says Dr. Matthieu
Gounelle of the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle in Paris. "Some
believe they are asteroidal, while others argue they are cometary. Our
work suggests that in a sense, both camps may be right."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Some of the meteorites that once resided in the asteroid belt
show signs they were hit by 3.5 to 3.9 billion years ago. Our model
allows us to make the case they were hit by captured comets or perhaps
their fragments," adds Dr. Kleomenis Tsiganis of Aristotle University
of Thessaloniki, Greece. "If so, they are telling us the same
intriguing story as the lunar samples, namely that the solar system
apparently went berserk and reconfigured itself about 4 billion years
ago."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the main asteroid belt contains a surprising
diversity of objects ranging from primitive ice/rock mixtures to
igneous rocks. The standard model used to explain this assumes that
most asteroids formed in place from a primordial disk that experienced
radical chemical changes within this zone. This model shows, however,
that the observed diversity of the asteroid belt is not a direct
reflection of the intrinsic compositional variation of the
proto-planetary disk. These results fundamentally change our view of
the asteroid belt.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional tests of this model will come from studies of
meteorites, the asteroid belt, planet formation and the Moon. "The Moon
and the asteroid belt may be the best and most accessible places in the
solar system to understand this critical part of solar system history,"
says Levison. "We believe key evidence from these cold airless bodies
may help us unlock the biggest 'cold case' of all time."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funding for this research was provided by NASA's Outer Planets
Research and Origins of Solar Systems programs. Additional support was
provided by NASA's Lunar Science Institute.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Journal reference:&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Levison et al. Contamination of the asteroid belt by primordial trans-Neptunian objects. &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;, 2009; 460 (7253): 364 DOI: &lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08094" target="_blank"&gt;10.1038/nature08094&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://spaceweather.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Possible Impact Event On Jupiter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189453-Possible-Impact-Event-On-Jupiter#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Space Weather&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:42 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24282/full/ff.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Anthony Wesley "&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24282/medium/ff.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Anthony Wesley &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Did
something just hit Jupiter? On July 19th, a black "scar" appeared in
Jupiter's clouds similar to the Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts of 1994.
Veteran Jupiter observer Anthony Wesley photographed the feature from
his observatory in Murrumbateman, Australia.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The jet-black mark is near Jupiter's south pole (south is up
in the image)," says Wesley. "I have imagery of that same location from
two nights earlier without the impact mark, so this is a very recent
event. The material has already begun to spread out in a fan shape on
one side, and should be rapidly pulled apart by the fast jetstream
winds. I recorded a lot of footage, and will be generating more images
and a rotation animation soon." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amateur astronomers around the world should train
their telescopes on Jupiter tonight to monitor the progress of this
possible impact event: &lt;a href="http://spaceweather.com/images2009/20jul09/skymap_north.gif?PHPSESSID=l021bqpuvp5m2b7f47if967ep2" target="_blank"&gt;sky map&lt;/a&gt;. Stay tuned for more images and &lt;a href="http://www.acquerra.com.au/astro/ObsReport/jupiter-impact.html" target="_blank"&gt;updates&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.physorg.com/news167329938.html" target="_blank"&gt;California's Channel Islands Hold Evidence of Clovis-Age Comets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189532-California-s-Channel-Islands-Hold-Evidence-of-Clovis-Age-Comets#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
PhysOrg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:41 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24326/full/1_californiasc.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© NOAA and UC Santa Barbara"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24326/pod/1_californiasc.jpg" alt="California" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NOAA and UC Santa Barbara&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This
map shows California's Channel Islands with the islands of the
previously combined islands of Santarosae encircled at the top.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
A
17-member team has found what may be the smoking gun of a much-debated
proposal that a cosmic impact about 12,900 years ago ripped through
North America and drove multiple species into extinction.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a paper appearing online ahead of regular publication in the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;,
University of Oregon archaeologist Douglas J. Kennett and colleagues
from nine institutions and three private research companies report the
presence of shock-synthesized hexagonal diamonds in 12,900-year-old
sediments on the Northern Channel Islands off the southern California
coast.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These tiny diamonds and diamond clusters were buried deeply
below four meters of sediment. They date to the end of Clovis -- a
Paleoindian culture long thought to be North America's first human
inhabitants. The nano-sized diamonds were pulled from Arlington Canyon
on the island of Santa Rosa that had once been joined with three other
Northern Channel Islands in a landmass known as Santarosae. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diamonds were found in association with soot,
which forms in extremely hot fires, and they suggest associated
regional wildfires, based on nearby environmental records.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such soot and diamonds are rare in the geological record. They
were found in sediment dating to massive asteroid impacts 65 million
years ago in a layer widely known as the K-T Boundary. The thin layer
of iridium-and-quartz-rich sediment dates to the transition of the
Cretaceous and Tertiary periods, which mark the end of the Mesozoic Era
and the beginning of the Cenozoic Era.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The type of diamond we have found -- Lonsdaleite -- is a
shock-synthesized mineral defined by its hexagonal crystalline
structure. It forms under very high temperatures and pressures
consistent with a cosmic impact," Kennett said. "These diamonds have
only been found thus far in meteorites and impact craters on Earth and
appear to be the strongest indicator yet of a significant cosmic impact
[during Clovis]." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24327/full/3_californiasc.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© University of Oregon"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24327/pod/3_californiasc.jpg" alt="lonsdaleite" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© University of Oregon&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This transmission electron microscopy close-up shows a single lonsdaleite crystal, left, and associated diffraction pattern.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
age of this event also matches the extinction of the pygmy mammoth on
the Northern Channel Islands, as well as numerous other North American
mammals, including the horse, which Europeans later reintroduced. In
all, an estimated 35 mammal and 19 bird genera became extinct near the
end of the Pleistocene with some of them occurring very close in time
to the proposed cosmic impact, first reported in October 2007 in &lt;em&gt;PNAS&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Jan. 2, 2009, issue of the journal &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;, a
team led by Kennett reported the discovery of billions of
nanometer-sized diamonds concentrated in sediments -- weighing from
about 10 to 2,700 parts per billion -- in six North American locations.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This site, this layer with hexagonal diamonds, is also
associated with other types of diamonds and with dramatic environmental
changes and wildfires," said James Kennett, paleoceanographer and
professor emeritus in the Department of Earth Science at the University
of California, Santa Barbara.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"There was a major event 12,900 years ago," he said. "It is
hard to explain this assemblage of materials without a cosmic impact
event and associated extensive wildfires. This hypothesis fits with the
abrupt cooling of the atmosphere as shown in the record of ocean
drilling of the Santa Barbara Channel. The cooling resulted when dust
from the high-pressure, high-temperature, multiple impacts was lofted
into the atmosphere, causing a dramatic drop in solar radiation."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hexagonal diamonds from Arlington Canyon were analyzed at
the UO's Lorry I. Lokey Laboratories, a world-class nanotechnology
facility built deep in bedrock to allow for sensitive microscopy and
other high-tech analyses of materials. The analyses were done in
collaboration with FEI, a Hillsboro, Ore., company that distributes the
high-resolution Titan microscope used to characterize the hexagonal
diamonds in this study.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron
microscopes were used in the extensive analyses of the sediment that
contained clusters of Lonsdaleite ranging in size from 20 to 1,800
nanometers. These diamonds were inside or attached to carbon particles
found in the sediments.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These findings are inconsistent with the alternative and
already hotly debated theory that overhunting by Clovis people led to
the rapid extinction of large mammals at the end of the ice age, the
research team argues in the &lt;em&gt;PNAS&lt;/em&gt;
paper. An alternative theory has held that climate change was to blame
for these mass extinctions. The cosmic-event theory suggests that rapid
climate change at this time was possibly triggered by a series of small
and widely dispersed comet strikes across much of North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/backyard-astronomer-spots-big-bang-on-jupiter-20090721-dria.html" target="_blank"&gt;Jupiter struck by something leaving an Earth-sized impact mark&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189544-Jupiter-struck-by-something-leaving-an-Earth-sized-impact-mark#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Asher Moses&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sydney Morning Herald&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:49 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24340/full/jupiter3_600x400.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© NASA"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24340/medium/jupiter3_600x400.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Confirmed
by NASA: A large impact on the left on Jupiter's south polar region
captured on July 20, 2009, by NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility in
Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Jupiter was slammed by an Earth-sized object exactly
15 years after Comet Schumacher-Levy did the same in 1994.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
An
amateur Australian astronomer has set the space-watching world on fire
after discovering that a rare comet or asteroid had crashed into
Jupiter, leaving an impact the size of Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anthony Wesley, 44, a computer programmer from Murrumbateman, a village north of Canberra, &lt;a href="http://jupiter.samba.org/" target="_blank"&gt;made the discovery&lt;/a&gt; about 1am yesterday using his backyard 14.5-inch reflecting telescope.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The impact would have occurred no more than two days earlier and will only be visible for another few days.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within hours, his images had spread across the internet on science websites.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory &lt;a href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/jup-20090720.html" target="_blank"&gt;confirmed the discovery&lt;/a&gt; at 9pm yesterday using its large infrared telescope at the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The
only other time astronomers have discovered evidence of a space object
having hit Jupiter was when the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet collided with
the giant planet in July, 1994.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That event was also the first direct observation of two objects colliding in space.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Glenn Orton, the NASA scientist who confirmed Wesley's discovery, said:
"We are extremely lucky to be seeing Jupiter at exactly the right time,
the right hour, the right side of Jupiter to witness the event. &lt;strong&gt;We couldn't have planned it better&lt;/strong&gt;."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Orton said he was not yet sure whether the object that hit Jupiter was a comet, asteroid or some other piece of space junk. But &lt;span class="BoldRed"&gt;the impact mark is about the size of the Earth.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's been a whirlwind of a day and this, &lt;span class="BoldRed"&gt;on the anniversary of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Apollo anniversaries&lt;/span&gt;, is amazing," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To most people the image is unremarkable and appears as little more than a scar on Jupiter's vast gas surface.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leigh Fletcher, an astronomer who worked with Orton on confirming the
discovery last night, said: "These are the most exciting observations
I've seen in my five years of observing the outer planets."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wesley said in a phone interview that documenting these sorts
of impacts was the only way to get new data on how the solar system
formed and what planets such as Jupiter are made of, as the impact
throws up debris that would otherwise be invisible when looking through
a telescope from Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collision also allows astronomers to examine Jupiter's role in cleaning up space debris in the solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"&lt;strong&gt;If anything like that had hit the Earth it would have been curtains for us&lt;/strong&gt;,
so we can feel very happy that Jupiter is doing its vacuum-cleaner job
and hoovering up all these large pieces before they come for us," he
said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"An impact event like this, even just knowing how often they
happen, gives you some idea of how much debris is left over from the
solar system when it formed and how quickly Jupiter is vacuuming up the
remains of the bits and pieces floating around in the solar system."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mike Salway, who runs the Australian amateur astronomy
community website iceinspace.com.au, said astronomers around the world
were raving about the discovery.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"Amateur astronomers are all over it at the moment - they all had their telescopes out last night looking for it," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wesley, who has been keen on astronomy since he was a child,
said telescopes and other astronomy equipment were so inexpensive now
that the hobby had become a viable pastime for just about anybody. His
own equipment cost about $10,000.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases, particularly with planets such as Jupiter,
professional space watchers were turning to amateurs to provide them
with new discoveries.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"A lot of the professional astronomers have access to large
scopes but those scopes are in demand for all sorts of other jobs and
you just can't afford to tie up a large telescope worth millions of
dollars looking at Jupiter every night," Wesley said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"These large telescopes only get built because of the
interests of the consortium parties, and those interests need to be
attended to, so it's really left to amateurs who've got no fixed agenda
to image whatever they find interesting."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17491-jupiter-sports-new-bruise-from-impact.html" target="_blank"&gt;Jupiter sports new 'bruise' from impact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189567-Jupiter-sports-new-bruise-from-impact#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Lisa Grossman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:38 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24345/full/ff.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Paul Kalas/Michael Fitzgerald/Franck Marchis/LLNL/UCLA/UC Berkeley/SETI Institute"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24345/medium/ff.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Paul Kalas/Michael Fitzgerald/Franck Marchis/LLNL/UCLA/UC Berkeley/SETI Institute&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Infrared
observations taken at the Keck II telescope in Hawaii reveal a bright
spot where the impact occurred. The spot looks black at visible
wavelengths&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Something has smashed into Jupiter, leaving behind a black spot in the planet's atmosphere, scientists confirmed on Monday.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is only the second time such an impact has been observed. The
first was almost exactly 15 years ago, when more than 20 fragments of
comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 collided with the gas giant.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This has all the hallmarks of an impact event, very similar
to Shoemaker-Levy 9," said Leigh Fletcher, an astronomer at NASA's Jet
Propulsion Lab in Pasadena, California. "We're all extremely excited."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The impact was discovered by amateur astronomer Anthony Wesley
in Murrumbateman, Australia at about 1330 GMT on Sunday. Wesley noticed
a black spot in Jupiter's south polar region - but he very nearly
stopped observing before he saw it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"By 1am I was ready to quit ... then changed my mind and
decided to carry on for another half hour or so," he wrote in his
observation report. Initially he suspected he was seeing one of
Jupiter's moons or a moon's shadow on the planet, but the location,
size and speed of the spot ruled out that possibility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;'Stroke of luck'&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After checking images taken two nights earlier and not seeing the spot,
he realised he had found something new and began emailing others.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the people he contacted were Fletcher and Glenn Orton,
also at JPL. They had serendipitously scheduled observing time on
NASA's InfraRed Telescope Facility in Hawaii for that night.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was a fantastic stroke of luck," Orton told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their team began observations at about 1000 GMT on 20 July, and
after six hours of observing confirmed that the spot was an impact and
not a weather event.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's completely unlike any of the weather phenomena that we observe on Jupiter," Orton says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Splash&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first clue was a near-infrared image of the upper
atmosphere above the impact site. An impact would make a splash like a
stone thrown into a pool, scattering material in the atmosphere
upwards. This material would then reflect sunlight, appearing as a
bright spot at near-infrared wavelengths.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And that's exactly what the team saw. "Our first image showed
a really bright object right where that black scar was, and immediately
we knew this was an impact," Orton says. "There's no natural phenomenon
that creates a black spot and bright particles like that."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporting evidence came from measurements of Jupiter's
temperature. Thermal images also showed a bright spot where the impact
took place, meaning the impact warmed up the lower atmosphere in that
area.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The researchers have also found hints of higher-than-normal
amounts of ammonia in the upper atmosphere. Extra ammonia had been
churned up by the previous Shoemaker-Levy comet impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Exotic chemistry&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Shoemaker-Levy impact also introduced some exotic chemistry
into Jupiter's atmosphere. The energy from the collision fused some of
the original atmospheric components into new molecules, such as
hydrogen cyanide.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists hope this new impact has done the same thing, since
that would allow them to follow the new materials and learn how the
atmosphere moves with time.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what was the impactor? "Not a clue," Orton says. He
speculates that it could have been a block of ice from somewhere in
Jupiter's neighborhood, or a wandering comet that was too faint for
astronomers to detect before the impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without having seen it, scientists can't tell how large the
object was. "But the impact scar we're seeing is about the same size as
one of Jupiter's big storms, Oval BA, Fletcher told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;. "That, I believe, is about the size of the Earth."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-07/uoc--tdo072109.php" target="_blank"&gt;Tiny diamonds on Santa Rosa Island give evidence of cosmic impact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189602-Tiny-diamonds-on-Santa-Rosa-Island-give-evidence-of-cosmic-impact#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Gail Gallessich&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
University of California - Santa Barbara&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24371/full/15482_web.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© UCSB"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24371/pod/15482_web.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© UCSB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This is James Kennett (left) and Douglas J. Kennett.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Santa
Barbara, Calif. - - Nanosized diamonds found just a few meters below
the surface of Santa Rosa Island off the coast of Santa Barbara &lt;strong&gt;provide strong evidence of a cosmic impact event in North America approximately 12,900 years ago&lt;/strong&gt;,
according to a new study by scientists. Their hypothesis holds that
fragments of a comet struck across North America at that time.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The research, published this week in the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;
(PNAS), was led by James Kennett, professor emeritus at UC Santa
Barbara, and Douglas J. Kennett, first author, of the University of
Oregon. The two are a father-son team. They were joined by 15 other
researchers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The pygmy mammoth, the tiny island version of the
North American mammoth, died off at this time," said James Kennett.
"Since it coincides with this event, we suggest it is related." He
explained that this site, with its layer containing hexagonal diamonds,
is also associated with other types of diamonds and with dramatic
environmental changes and wildfires. They are part of a sedimentary
layer known as the Younger Dryas Boundary.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24370/full/15483_web.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© James C. Weaver"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24370/pod/15483_web.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© James C. Weaver&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Here are hexagonal nanodiamonds discovered on Santa Rosa Island.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;"There was a major event 12,900 years ago," &lt;/strong&gt;said
James Kennett. "It is hard to explain this assemblage of materials
without a cosmic impact event and associated extensive wildfires. This
hypothesis fits with the abrupt climatic cooling as recorded in
ocean-drilled sediments beneath the Santa Barbara Channel. The cooling
resulted when dust from the high-pressure, high-temperature, multiple
impacts was lofted into the atmosphere, causing a dramatic drop in
solar radiation." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tiny diamonds were buried below four meters of sediment and they
correspond with the disappearance of the Clovis culture - - the first
well-established and distributed North American peoples. An estimated
35 types of mammals and 19 types of birds also became extinct in North
America about this time.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The type of diamond we have found - - lonsdaleite - - is a
shock-synthesized mineral defined by its hexagonal crystalline
structure," said Douglas Kennett, associate professor of anthropology
at the University of Oregon. "It forms under very high temperatures and
pressures consistent with a cosmic impact. These diamonds have only
been found thus far in meteorites and impact craters on earth, and
appear to be the strongest indicator yet of a significant cosmic impact
[during Clovis]."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24369/full/15484_web.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© James Kennett"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24369/pod/15484_web.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© James Kennett&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;This image shows a dark layer of sediment is exposed in Arlington Canyon on Santa Rosa Island.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
diamonds were found in association with soot, which forms in extremely
hot fires, and they suggest associated regional wildfires, based on
nearby environmental records. Such soot and diamonds are rare in the
geological record. They were found in sediment dating to massive
asteroid impacts 65 million years ago in a layer widely known as the
K-T Boundary, known to be associated with the extinction of dinosaurs
and many other types of organisms.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
James Kennett, former director of the Marine Science Institute
at UCSB, is considered by some of his peers to be the "father" of
marine geology and paleoceanography. The native of New Zealand notes
that the sedimentary layers beneath the Santa Barbara Channel provide a
unique window on the history of the world's climate and ocean changes.
The area is one of the best locations in the world for this type of
geological research.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas Kennett received his bachelor's, master's, and Ph.D in anthropology at UCSB.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Co-authors on the PNAS paper are Jon M. Erlandson and Brendan
J. Culleton, of the University of Oregon; Allen West of GeoScience
Consulting in Arizona; G. James West of UC Davis; Ted E. Bunch and
James H. Wittke, of Northern Arizona University; Shane S. Que Hee of
UCLA; John R. Johnson of the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History;
Chris Mercer of UCSB and National Institute of Materials Science in
Japan; Feng Shen of the FEI Company; Thomas W. Stafford of Stafford
Research Inc. of Colorado; Wendy S. Wolbach and Adrienne Stich, of
DePaul University in Chicago; and James C. Weaver of UC Riverside.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Science Foundation provided primary funding for this research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://ufoinfo.com/sightings/usa/090624.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;US: Granbury, Texas - Fireball seen during daylight hours&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189725-US-Granbury-Texas-Fireball-seen-during-daylight-hours#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
John Hayes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UFOINFO&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:59 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 22, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date:&lt;/span&gt; June 24th 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time: &lt;/span&gt;Daylight hour 6:57pm CDST
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of witnesses:&lt;/span&gt; One
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of objects: &lt;/span&gt;One
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Shape of objects:&lt;/span&gt; Round, Ball shaped
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Weather Conditions:&lt;/span&gt; Clear
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt; Small fireball traveling
from Northeast to Southwest north of Granbury Texas. Not so spectacular
with the exception that it was still during bright daylight. I suspect
it was a meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;TV/Radio:&lt;/span&gt; I won't report but if someone else does I would like to be informed.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Note:&lt;/span&gt; This fireball/meteor report is included for reference purposes - John @ UFOINFO.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0722/p02s04-usgn.html" target="_blank"&gt;Jupiter collision a warning call to Earth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189754-Jupiter-collision-a-warning-call-to-Earth#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Peter N. Spotts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Christian Science Monitor&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:01 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24462/full/AJUPITERHIT_P1.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© NASA/Reuters"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24462/medium/AJUPITERHIT_P1.jpg" alt="Jupiter's scar" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA/Reuters&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This detail image shows a large impact shown on the bottom left on
Jupiter's south polar region captured on July 20, by NASA's Infrared
Telescope Facility in Mauna Kea, Hawaii&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The list
of cosmic objects that could hit Earth is growing. Scientists study
satellite 'tractors' and nuclear weapons as ways to divert asteroids
headed our way.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When an object smacked into Jupiter over the weekend, giving
astronomers their best cosmic-collision show since the comet
Shoemaker-Levy 9 in 1994, the giant gas ball of a planet took the poke
like the Pillsbury Dough Boy.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For all its scientific interest, however, &lt;strong&gt;the
collision also serves as a stark reminder that the solar system remains
a shooting gallery - with Earth, as well as Jupiter, on the wrong side
of the firing line.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The object's signature on Jupiter's cloud tops initially was discovered
by Australian amateur astronomer Anthony Wesley as he gathered digital
images of the giant planet through his 14.5-inch telescope. After
alerting other astronomers to what appeared to be a "scar" in the cloud
tops similar to those generated by the pieces of Shoemaker-Levy 9, NASA
scientists trained a 3-meter (9.8-foot) infrared telescope on the
planet and got a good look at the scar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It could be the impact of a comet," according to
Glenn Orton, a scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
Pasadena, Calif., in a statement yesterday. "But we don't know for sure
yet."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;When it comes to objects Earthlings should keep an eye on, the catalog scientists have amassed is swelling.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1995, astronomers associated with 10 search projects have discovered more than &lt;strong&gt;6,200 near-Earth asteroids of all sizes&lt;/strong&gt;, according to data from JPL. &lt;strong&gt;Some
784 are at least a kilometer (0.62 miles) across or larger. Just over
1,000 of the total have been deemed "potentially hazardous"&lt;/strong&gt;  -  those that pass Earth at a distance of less than 4.7 million miles.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And while the biggest ones have the potential to inflict the most damage, scientists are gaining a new appreciation of &lt;strong&gt;the punch even small ones can deliver.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two and a half years ago, scientists at Sandia National Laboratories in
Albuquerque, N.M., conducted advanced supercomputer simulations of the
June 1908 event over Siberia that flattened and scorched trees over a
region 30 miles across. Estimates put the explosive clout of the air
burst from either a meteor or comet fragment at between 10 and 20
megatons.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The good news: Calculations on Sandia's supercomputer, in 3-D,
push that explosive yield down to between three and five megatons. The
bad news: The calculations also indicated that &lt;strong&gt;the
asteroid or comet fragment was much smaller than previously estimated.
There are more small asteroids hurtling around us than large ones.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldRed"&gt;Sometimes they can seem to come out of nowhere&lt;/span&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last October, astronomers detected an asteroid an estimated two to five
meters across. Some 21 hours later, it entered the atmosphere over
northern Sudan sprinkling the Nubian desert with meteorites. The
object's blast was estimated at roughly 1,000 tons of TNT.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For asteroid specialists, this was a live-fire test of
protocols they'd developed to alert astronomers to monitor the object
to refine orbital and impact-location estimates - and to alert national
authorities that a direct hit was on the way.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident "underscored the successful evolution of the
Near-Earth Object Program's discovery and orbit-prediction process,"
wrote JPL scientists Steve Chesley, Paul Chodas, and Don Yeomans in a
post-event report on the incident.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal, of course, is to spot these objects and produce
highly refined orbit estimates in time to take defensive action, if
necessary.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what might that action look like?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lengthy analysis of options that earned him a newly-minted
PhD in aeronautical engineering from the University of Glasgow, Joan
Pau Sanchez Cuartielles sorts through several approaches ranging from
detonating a small nuclear bomb near an asteroid to using a
modest-sized satellite as a kind of tractor that tugs the asteroid into
a less dangerous orbit, connected to the asteroid by their mutual
gravity.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand-off nuclear option (with an explosive yield tailored
to the mass and density of the asteroid) turned out to be the most
effective, although politically troublesome. The gravity tug could be
effective with long lead times, or if the goal is to nudge an asteroid
just enough to ensure it avoids a gravitational sweet spot, or keyhole,
that would put it on a collision course with Earth decades into the
future. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-comment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;The reader might also want to read &lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/151954-Meteorites-Asteroids-and-Comets-Damages-Disasters-Injuries-Deaths-and-Very-Close-Calls" target="_blank"&gt;Meteorites, Asteroids, and Comets: Damages, Disasters, Injuries, Deaths, and Very Close Calls&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/07/23/new-image-of-jupiter-impact-in-infrared/" target="_blank"&gt;New Image of Jupiter Impact in Infrared&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Universe Today&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:22 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24457/full/ff.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Gemini Observatory / AURA"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24457/medium/ff.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Gemini Observatory / AURA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
After
getting whacked unexpectedly by a small comet or asteroid, Jupiter is
sporting a "bruise," which has been big news this week. In visible
wavelengths, the impact site appears as a black spot. But in a new
image taken in near infrared by the Gemini North telescope on Mauna
Kea, Hawai'i, the spot shows up in spectacular glowing yellow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We utilized the powerful mid-infrared capabilities of the Gemini
telescope to record the impact's effect on Jupiter's upper atmosphere,"
said Imke de Pater from the University of California, Berkeley. "At
these wavelengths we receive thermal radiation (heat) from the planet's
upper atmosphere. The impact site is clearly much warmer than its
surroundings, as shown by our image taken at an infrared wavelength of
18 microns."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As &lt;em&gt;Universe Today&lt;/em&gt; reported earlier, this new spot on
Jupiter was first seen by Australian amateur astronomer Anthony Wesley
on July 19th. This set off a flurry of activity as the large ground
based observatories have imaged Jupiter in attempt to learn more about
the impact and the object that struck Jupiter. Astronomers now say the
object &lt;strong&gt;was likely a small comet or asteroid, just a few hundreds of meters in diameter&lt;/strong&gt;.
Such small bodies are nearly impossible to detect near or beyond
Jupiter unless they reveal cometary activity, or, as in this case, make
their presence known by impacting a giant planet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In infrared, the impact site shows up in remarkable detail.&lt;strong&gt; "The structure of the impact site is eerily reminiscent of the larger Shoemaker-Levy 9 sites 15 years ago,"&lt;/strong&gt;
remarked Heidi Hammel (Space Science Institute), who was part of the
team that supported the effort at Gemini. In 1994, Hammel led the
Hubble Space Telescope team that imaged Jupiter when it was pummeled by
a shattered comet. "The morphology is suggestive of an arc-like
structure in the feature's debris field," Hammel noted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gemini images were obtained with the MICHELLE spectrograph/imager,
yielding a series of images at 7 different mid-infrared wavelengths.
Two of the images (8.7 and 9.7 microns) were combined into a color
composite image by Travis Rector at the University of Alaska, Anchorage
to create the final false-color image. By using the full set of Gemini
images taken over a range of wavelengths from 8 to 18 microns, the team
will be able to disentangle the effects of temperature, ammonia
abundance, and upper atmospheric aerosol content. Comparing these
Gemini observations with past and future images will permit the team to
study the evolution of features as Jupiter's strong winds disperse
them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The Gemini support staff made a heroic effort to get these data," said
de Pater. "We were on the telescope observing within 24 hours of
contacting the observatory." Because of the transient nature of this
event, the telescope was scheduled as a "Target of Opportunity" and
required staff to react quickly to the request." &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Have you read &lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/189756-Stephen-Hawking-Space-debris-represents-biggest-natural-threat-to-humanity" target="_blank"&gt;Stephen Hawking: Space debris represents biggest natural threat to humanity&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_bestofweb"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/06/the-neo-code-hotspots-most-at-risk-of-an-asteroid-impact.html" target="_blank"&gt;Stephen Hawking: Space debris represents biggest natural threat to humanity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189756-Stephen-Hawking-Space-debris-represents-biggest-natural-threat-to-humanity#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Casey Kazan &amp;amp; Rebecca Sato&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
dailygalaxy.com&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:13 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24466/full/hst2_small.gif" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Space Telescope Science Institute"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24466/medium/hst2_small.gif" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Space Telescope Science Institute&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Something wicked this way comes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Stephen
Hawking believes that one of the major factors in the possible scarcity
of intelligent life in our galaxy is the high probability of an
asteroid or comet colliding with inhabited planets. "We have observed,"
Hawking points out in Life in the Universe, "the collision of a comet,
Schumacher-Levi, with Jupiter (below), which produced a series of
enormous fireballs, plumes many thousands of kilometers high, hot
"bubbles" of gas in the atmosphere, and large dark "scars" on the
atmosphere which had lifetimes on the order of weeks."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is thought the collision of a rather smaller body with the
Earth, about 70 million years ago, was responsible for the extinction
of the dinosaurs. A few small early mammals survived, but anything as
large as a human, would have almost certainly been wiped out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Through Earth's history such collisions occur, on the
average every one million year. If this figure is correct, it would
mean that intelligent life on Earth has developed only because of the
lucky chance that there have been no major collisions in the last 70
million years. Other planets in the galaxy, Hawking believes, on which
life has developed, may not have had a long enough collision free
period to evolve intelligent beings.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;"The threat of the Earth being hit by an asteroid is
increasingly being accepted as the single greatest natural disaster
hazard faced by humanity," &lt;/strong&gt;according to Nick Bailey of the
University of Southampton's School of Engineering Sciences team, who
has developed a threat identifying program.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team used raw data from multiple impact simulations to
rank each country based on the number of times and how severely they
would be affected by each impact. The software, called NEOimpactor
(from NASA's "NEO" or Near Earth Object program), has been specifically
developed for measuring the impact of 'small' asteroids under one
kilometer in diameter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early results indicate that in terms of population lost,
China, Indonesia, India, Japan and the United States face the greatest
overall threat; while the United States, China, Sweden, Canada and
Japan face the most severe economic effects due to the infrastructure
destroyed.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The top ten countries most at risk are China, Indonesia,
India, Japan, the United States, the Philippines, Italy, the United
Kingdom, Brazil and Nigeria.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The consequences for human populations and infrastructure as
a result of an impact are enormous," says Bailey. "Nearly one hundred
years ago a remote region near the Tunguska River witnessed the largest
asteroid impact event in living memory when a relatively small object
(approximately 50 meters in diameter) exploded in mid-air. While it
only flattened unpopulated forest, had it exploded over London it could
have devastated everything within the M25. Our results highlight those
countries that face the greatest risk from this most global of natural
hazards and thus indicate which nations need to be involved in
mitigating the threat."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would happen to the human species and life on Earth in
general if an asteroid the size of the one that created the famous K/T
Event of 65 million years ago at the end of the Mesozoic Era that
resulted in the extinction of the dinosaurs impacted our planet.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24464/full/sl9a.gif" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24464/medium/sl9a.gif" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Stephen Hawking says, the general consensus is that any comet or
asteroid greater than 20 kilometers in diameter that strikes the Earth
will result in the complete annihilation of complex life - animals and
higher plants. (The asteroid Vesta, for example, one of the
destinations of the Dawn Mission, is the size of Arizona).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;How many times in our galaxy alone has life finally evolved to
the equivalent of our plants and animals on some far distant planet,
only to be utterly destroyed by an impact?&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span class="BoldRed"&gt;Galactic history suggests it might be a common occurrence.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first thing to understand about the KT event is that it was
absolutely enormous: an asteroid (or comet) six to 10 miles in diameter
streaked through the Earth's atmosphere at 25,000 miles an hour and
struck the Yucatan region of Mexico with the force of 100 megatons -
the equivalent of one Hiroshima bomb for every person alive on Earth
today. Not a pretty scenario!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Recent calculations show that our planet would go into another
"Snowball Earth" event like the one that occurred 600 million years
ago, when it is believed the oceans froze over &lt;/strong&gt;(although some scientists dispute this hypothesis -see link below).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While microbial bacteria might readily survive such calamitous impacts,
our new understanding from the record of the Earth's mass extinctions
clearly shows that plants and animals are very susceptible to
extinction in the wake of an impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Impact rates depend on how many comets and asteroids exist in
a particular planetary system. In general there is one major impact
every million years - a mere blink of the eye in geological time. It
also depends on how often those objects are perturbed from safe orbits
that parallel the Earth's orbit to new, Earth-crossing orbits that
might, sooner or later, result in a catastrophic K/T or Permian-type
mass extinction.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The asteroid that hit Vredefort located in the Free State
Province of South Africa is one of the largest to ever impact Earth,
estimated at over 10 km (6 miles) wide, although it is believed by many
that the original size of the impact structure could have been 250 km
in diameter, or possibly larger (though the Wilkes Land crater in
Antarctica, if confirmed to have been the result of an impact event, is
even larger at 500 kilometers across). The town of Vredefort is
situated in the crater (image).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dating back 2,023 million years, it is the oldest astrobleme
found on earth so far, with a radius of 190km, it is also the most
deeply eroded. Vredefort Dome Vredefort bears witness to the world's
greatest known single energy release event, which caused devastating
global change, including, according to many scientists, major
evolutionary changes.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has kept the Earth "safe" at least the past 65 million
years, other than blind luck is the massive gravitational field of
Jupiter, our cosmic guardian, with its stable circular orbit far from
the sun, which assures a low number of impacts resulting in mass
extinctions by sweeping up and scatters away most of the dangerous
Earth-orbit-crossing comets and asteroids &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-comment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="355"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_CnGRnz9Fi4&amp;amp;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Scientists_Still_At_Odds_On_Tunguska_After_100_Years_999.html"&gt;Scientists Still At Odds On Tunguska After 100 Years&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189769-Scientists-Still-At-Odds-On-Tunguska-After-100-Years#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
David Burghardt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
RIA Novosti&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:45 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a title="© Unknown" target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24473/full/ff.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24473/medium/ff.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Four
professors from the University of Bologna, Carlo Stanghellini, Maurizio
Serrazanetti, Romano Serra, and Marco Cocchi, believe Lake Cheko was
created by a meteorite impact due to its shape and tree growth in the
area. The lake is elliptical (approximately 100 meters by 300 meters)
rather than round, which is consistent with other lakes and swamps in
the area. However, no impact ring or rim residue has been discovered at
the lake, which would be noticeable had a meteorite created the lake.
The native Evenki say that the lake has always been there and the name
comes from the Evenki language meaning "dark waters."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
More
than 100 years have passed since the Tunguska Meteorite Event and the
mystery of its occurrence remains unsolved, but scientists have not
given up on solving the riddle. This July, an international research
group from Italy and the United States ventured into deepest Siberia to
investigate the most likely explanations of the mysterious event, and &lt;em&gt;RIA Novosti&lt;/em&gt; correspondent David Burghardt joined them.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 30, 1908, Eastern Siberia was hit by an explosion equal to
2,000 times the nuclear bomb that destroyed the Japanese city of
Hiroshima in 1945, destroying 2,200 square kilometers of taiga and
flattening tens of millions of trees. If this impact had occurred four
hours later, the city of St. Petersburg and other nearby villages would
have been wiped off the face of the earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Travel to epicenter&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some 15 hours after the devastating impact, the skies throughout Europe
were lit up for several nights and white nights were noted in places
that had never experienced such a phenomenon. Witnesses at the time in
Britain, Denmark and Germany said they were able to read a newspaper in
the middle of the night without using any artificial light.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was not until the winter of 1927-1928 that the first
expedition was organized to investigate reports from witnesses of the
event. The expedition was led by Russian scientist Leonid Kulik, who
headed for the epicenter in search for the meteorite he believed was
the only possible explanation for the event.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Travel back then to such a remote area was a very expensive
and grueling affair, taking first a train to Krasnoyarsk in Eastern
Siberia, and then traveling north on foot for hundreds of kilometers.
Kulik's first expedition 19 years after the event enlisted numerous
native Evenki guides and dozens of reindeer. Kulik, like hundreds of
scientists after him, found no traces of a meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Travel to the area today is much easier than in Kulik's time,
taking an airplane from Moscow to Krasnoyarsk, then a small prop plane
to the village of Vanavara, and finally a Russian Mi-8 cargo helicopter
into the region of the epicenter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two-week expedition included six professors from the
University of Bologna, the University of Florence, and Cornell
University.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some 100 theories of the Tunguska Event, including
some of the more bizarre ones of a UFO crash site, a WWII bomber caught
in a time warp and returning to 1908, Earth crossing through a black
hole, and a cloud of mosquitoes that spontaneously combusted due to
heat created by flying too densely.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first theory was created in 1908 by native Evenki tribes
in Eastern Siberia who were the actual witnesses of the event.
According to their legend, the fire god, Agdy, became angered and
destroyed all that was living in the area. Witnesses said there were
several deafening explosions and trees were heard falling thousands of
miles away.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The researchers looked at two of the most probable theories:
meteorite impact and volcanic gas vent explosion. The scientific
expedition was divided into two camps, one at Lake Cheko, where they
were researching the meteorite theory, and the other at Kulik's Cabin
near the epicenter (some 10 kilometers from the first group), where
they were researching geological explanations for the blast.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Meteorite Impact Theory (Lake Cheko)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the hundreds of expeditions into the epicenter or impact
area, not one has found any evidence that a meteorite struck the
Earth's surface. Pieces of a meteorite have never been discovered and
no crater has been confirmed anywhere in the area.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four professors from the University of Bologna, Carlo
Stanghellini, Maurizio Serrazanetti, Romano Serra, and Marco Cocchi,
believe Lake Cheko was created by a meteorite impact due to its shape
and tree growth in the area. The lake is elliptical (approximately 100
meters by 300 meters) rather than round, which is consistent with other
lakes and swamps in the area.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, no impact ring or rim residue has been discovered at
the lake, which would be noticeable had a meteorite created the lake.
The native Evenki say that the lake has always been there and the name
comes from the Evenki language meaning "dark waters."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professors Stanghellini and Serrazanetti focused their
research on the lake bottom using both technical and not so technical
equipment, including a magnetometer, radar, underwater camera and
grappling hooks.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scientists used a magnetometer to locate magnetic elements
on the floor of the lake such as iron or other metallic elements, which
would indicate that a meteorite or its fragments were on the bottom.
Stanghellini described a magnetometer as a sophisticated compass that
will show peaks on a monitor if it finds something metal.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said that just like a regular compass, if you set a piece
of metal near it, the arrow will point to the metal piece and not to
the magnetic North. Because of the magnetometer's sensitivity, the
scientists did their research on an inflatable rubber raft using wooden
oars so as not spike the instrument. Before the process, they flagged
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the entire lake in 10-meter swaths. They discovered a small
anomaly in the center of the lake on one of the passes and said they
would study the data more thoroughly on their return to Italy. On the
following day, however, the magnetic anomaly was not detected on the
screen and the scientists did not collect any other substantial
evidence to support their theory that there are meteorite fragments on
the bottom of the lake.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They also conducted radar soundings and underwater filming, but again came up with no substantial evidence.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grappling hooks were dragged along the lake bottom to recover
debris. They recovered mostly small branches and roots, which may or
may not have been from 1908. The scientists said that the debris could
have been under a thick layer of silt that would have preserved the
debris, though they may have been recently deposited by the stream
flowing into the lake. These samples were packed and sent to the
university to define their age and find any proof of impact damage to
them.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stanghellini said further research of the lake's bottom was
necessary, especially in drilling a core sample beneath the lake,
though this would require international support and financing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On shore, professors Serra and Cocchi cut down several trees
and collected slabs as well as core samples of trees that survived the
1908 event, trees that were destroyed after the event and younger trees
that appeared after the event. Samples were taken on the North and
South side of Lake Cheko.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to their preliminary studies, the samples showed
that the trees had tight rings prior to the 1908 event, which means the
trees grew very slowly due to competition with other trees and were
growing densely together. Serra said that in 1908, the trees show scars
with resin deposits (pitch) and then a very slow growth rate for two
years due to shock. After 1910, the trees show much wider rings, which
indicate there was less competition with other trees, more sunlight and
nutrients.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also said that the coniferous trees in the area should be
associated with trees from the taiga and not lakeside forests, where
there is usually heavy underbrush. Serra said that tree samples taken
4-50 meters from the lake are similar in growth patterns of trees 2-3
kilometers away from the lake prior to 1908, indicating that all of the
trees are native to a taiga environment and not a lake.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a significant growth change occurred in the
trees located by the lake after 1908; whereas, those trees kilometers
away from the lake continued to have tight rings due to slow growth and
competition.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Serra noted that the survivor trees were much smaller during
the 1908 event, meaning that they were bent over or twisted during the
impact. All of the large trees, on the other hand, were uprooted. He
said this is similar to what happens to trees during a hurricane. He
also noted that the tree samples taken near Lake Cheko were similar to
those taken after the Chernobyl nuclear reactor meltdown site in
Ukraine in 1986.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence collected in previous expeditions by Serra showed
that tree limbs from 1908 contained deposits of magnesium, titanium,
sulfurs, and several undefined elements, which would support the
theories of a meteorite or even volcanic activity.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All four of the Italian researchers at Lake Cheko believe the
lake was created by one of three impacts in 1908: the first exploded in
the atmosphere, the second struck the ground, creating Lake Cheko and
changing the direction of the creek, and the third struck the ground
further North at the epicenter, presumably creating several deep bogs.
They agreed that the meteorite that created the lake would have been
1-5 meters in diameter and the tree growth around the lake proved that
it was created in 1908.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cocchi did much research on an old creek bed that the
scientists assume was cut off or rerouted after the 1908 event.
Difficulties in researching the creek bed arise due to the fact that 20
centimeters under the surface there is permafrost that cannot be dug
up. Drilling the creek bed is also planned to get a core sample in
order to estimate when the creek changed its course and began flowing
into the lake after it was created by the meteorite, according to the
scientists.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Volcanic Gas Vent Explosion Theory (Tunguska Epicenter)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jason Phipps Morgan, a geophysicist from Cornell University,
and Paola Vanucchi, a geologist and geophysicist from the University of
Florence, believe that the 1908 event was the result of a gas vent
explosion created from the center of the earth. They did much
investigation around the epicenter, especially what is called John's
Rock, which is a 10-12 ton rock formation that is free-standing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Morgan, this rock was actually "burped up" when
the gas vent exploded, pushing the rock to the surface through a
funnel. Morgan named the still unconfirmed funnel after his colleague,
Paola's Funnel. He noted that this rock is the only one of its kind in
the area and is definitely of volcanic nature. The scientists collected
some 30 kilograms of rock samples, especially quartz and quartzite,
from and around John's Rock, in search of shocked quartz, which would
indicate that there was volcanic activity in the area.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vanucchi said that some of the rock samples showed traces of
being shocked, or fractured, and further research on the samples would
be completed in both Italy and the United States. She also said that
they believe they have found the main vent of the volcanic gas
explosion very near to John's Rock.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The researchers revealed that the Russian geological mineral
map they were supplied with was incorrect in many places in regard to
the elements found in the area, as well as to the depth of some of the
quartz deposits. Vanucchi said that they had started updating the
existing map, but further research would be needed to perfect it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scientists were also interested in Churgym Waterfall which
showed one of the largest samples of volcanic basalt in the world,
indicating millions of years of volcanic activity in the area. There
was a constant flow of lava, which is visible in layers around the
falls and stream. Only some 30 meters of the basalt is above the
surface, which is visible due to erosion by the stream and there is no
estimate of how deep the volcanic rock extends beneath the earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Morgan said the amount of basalt in the area is so great that
it proves the existence of constant volcanic activity for millions of
years. Samples from the waterfall area were also taken for comparison
with those from the John's Rock location. Though lava has ceased to
reach the surface, lava vents still exist and can build up pressure and
blow, thus creating a blast like that in the epicenter.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Comet Theory&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most commonly acceptable theories today is that of a
comet or a piece from the tail of a comet hitting the Earth's surface.
Upon returning to Moscow, RIA Novosti spoke with two Russian scientists
on the comet theory.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vitaly Romeiko, the director of the Department of Astrophysics
at Zvenigorod Observatory, said in an interview in Moscow that the 1908
event was caused by a fragment of the Encke Comet's tail that entered
the Earth's atmosphere as a ball of ice with small interplanetary
fragments (dust particles) and, upon entrance, exploded due to the
negative ions in the comet and the positive ions found on Earth. He
pointed out that the Encke Comet also revolves around the sun and comes
near Earth every 3.3 years.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romeiko has participated in 23 expeditions into the Tunguska region.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Olga Gladysheva, a senior fellow at the A.F. Ioffe Physics and
Technical Institute in St. Petersburg, supported Romeiko's theory in a
separate interview with &lt;em&gt;RIA Novosti&lt;/em&gt;,
adding that the part of the comet's tail separated and created a giant
ice ball that was created in a vacuum, and, therefore, made several
explosions as the particles inside expanded and the ball disintegrated.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian scientists base their theory on the fact on the
absence of any meteorite material in the area, no rock fragments, or no
impact areas that would create a crater.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gladysheva said part of the comet's tail entered the Earth's
ionosphere at more than 80 kilometers above ground, which is an intense
area of atmospheric electricity. She said a major blast occurred over
the epicenter at an altitude of 7-10 kilometers above the Earth's
surface. The significance of the blast was due to the overly charged
ions and differences in the positive and negative poles in the comet
and Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romeiko said the ice ball that formed around the comet's dust
particles before striking Earth would explain the absence of a crater
or meteorite particles. The particles from the comet would be very
minute and could most likely be found in the lower layers of peat moss
in the area, which is frozen in permafrost.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;101 Years Of An Unsolved Mystery&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In separate conversations with the researchers during the
expedition into the Tunguska epicenter, they all shared the same idea
that the mystery will never be solved because scientists with their own
theories and hypotheses will never agree on one single explanation. In
regard to this, Romeiko said: "No one will back down on a theory that
he has defended his entire life because that would mean failure."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the researchers returned without any substantial
explanations for the event, they plan on returning to Tunguska to
continue their research and prove their theories. Serra said there
would be interest in the Tunguska Event far into the future, because
the best scientists from around the world have been there and no one
has come up with an explanation, which scientists simply cannot accept.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the Italian and American research group left the
epicenter, a new group of Russian "scientists" arrived. One of the
group members said that she had worked with a psychic to identify which
swamp a UFO had collided into in 1908.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon returning to the town of Vanavara, some 65 kilometers to
the South of the epicenter, the Tunguska Reserve director, Ludmila
Logunova, said that they know where the meteorite is located, but if
they reveal its location, people would stop visiting the region. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;For an in-depth review, read &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/160925-Tunguska-Psychopathy-and-the-Sixth-Extinction"&gt;Tunguska, Psychopathy and the Sixth Extinction&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n0907/21venus/"&gt;Smashing days! New bright spot observed on Venus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189806-Smashing-days-New-bright-spot-observed-on-Venus#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Dr Emily Baldwin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Astronomy Now&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:05 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-center"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24491/full/venus.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="" title="Click to enlarge" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24491/medium/venus.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;An intense bright spot has appeared in the clouds of Venus. Could it be associated with volcanic activity on the surface?&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Solar System is breaking out in spots. &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/189544-Jupiter-struck-by-something-leaving-an-Earth-sized-impact-mark"&gt;First Jupiter took a smack&lt;/a&gt;
from a passing asteroid or comet, manifesting as a dark scar in the
Jovian atmosphere, and now Venus is sporting a brilliant white spot in
its southern polar region.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an alert to fellow amateur astronomers, Venus observer
Frank Melillo reports on his images captured on 19 July: "I have seen
bright spots before but &lt;strong&gt;this one is an exceptional bright and quite intense area." &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He suggests that it could be explained as an atmospheric effect, but
could it be a sign of volcanic activity at the planet's surface? Venus
is covered in a thick cloak of clouds which prevents any visible
observation of the surface. Instead, radar is used to map the surface,
but volcanic activity has never been observed directly.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"A volcanic eruption would be nice, but let's wait and find
out!" says Venus specialist Dr Sanjay Limaye of the University of
Wisconsin. &lt;strong&gt;"An eruption would have to be quite energetic to get a cloud this high."&lt;/strong&gt; Furthermore, at a latitude of 50 degrees south, the spot lies outside the region of known volcanoes on Venus.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Melillo comments that the spot will not be seen again as intense as it
is now, thanks to the rapid rotation of the planet's atmosphere. "I
hope that someone will image Venus on Thursday when this part of the
atmosphere is facing us again," he says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further observations will help shed light on the genesis of the bright spot and how it evolves as the atmosphere churns over.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-comment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Volcanic eruptions? &lt;em&gt;Somebody&lt;/em&gt; knows what's really going on . . .
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/186499-Military-Hush-Up-Incoming-Space-Rocks-Now-Classified"&gt;Military Hush-Up: Incoming Space Rocks Now Classified&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nothing to see here folks, please move along . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong style="color: red;"&gt;Flashback:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.livescience.com/space/etc/090626-dramatic-fireball-over-southern-arizona.html"&gt;Dramatic Fireball over Southern Arizona&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a onclick="window.print(); return false;" href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189758-Dramatic-Fireball-over-Southern-Arizona#"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Robert Roy Britt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
LiveScience&lt;br /&gt;
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:28 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
A bright fireball was spotted by several observers Tuesday, June 23
over Tucson and other parts of southern Arizona. It was a space rock
that broke apart dramatically as it streaked into Earth's atmosphere -
a "shooting star" on steroids. &lt;strong&gt;Such
events are not uncommon, but most are not seen because they occur over
the oceans, or late at night when few people are watching, or during
the day when they are not visible&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One observer compared it to a memorable 1992 event known as the Peekskill Fireball.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Arizona fireball "looked very similar to the Peekskill one," writes Carl Hergenrother on the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://transientsky.wordpress.com/"&gt;Transient Sky&lt;/a&gt;
blog. "The colors are a close match with the head of the main fireball
and pieces a brilliant blue-green while the long tails appeared
reddish. Birth fireballs also produced many fragments which broke off
the main body and quickly fell behind."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A "series of loud sonic booms heard from Tucson southward,"
Hergenrother writes, based on the accounts of others. He does not think
the Arizona fireball lasted as long as the Peekskill event, however.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peekskill fireball was recorded by many observers along
the East Coast of the United States - some of whom were out with their
video cameras watching football games - around 7:50 pm, on Friday, Oct.
9, 1992. Check it out: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RrL-cWaYdno&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;From the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://transientsky.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/more-info-on-the-so-az-fireball/"&gt;Transient Sky&lt;/a&gt; blog:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
From KOLD, Tucson's local CBS affiliate, a video of the fireball taken
by a security camera in Marana (just north of Tucson). The video shows
what appears to be 2 fainter pieces below and to the right of the main
fireball. I believe those 2 fainter objects are just reflections caused
by the optics of the camera and are not actually real. What is real is
the main fireball appearing in 3 or more pieces right before it faded
from view.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IYyswLf1BRs&amp;amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" width="425"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cloudbait.com/science/fireball20090713.html" target="_blank"&gt;Colorado: July 13, 2009 Fireball&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189760-Colorado-July-13-2009-Fireball#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Cloudbait Observatory&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:57 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
This slow, bright fireball occurred at 2:28 AM MDT over central Colorado. I have not received any witness reports.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Data has been recovered from the following cameras:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href="http://www.cloudbait.com/meteor/map_1.gif" target="_blank"&gt;Cloudbait&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://www.cloudbait.com/meteor/data.php?recnum=26751" target="_blank"&gt;details&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.cloudbait.com/science/showvid.php?f=../meteor/flv/20090713_022753_001&amp;amp;c=2009.07.13%20Fireball%20%28Cloudbait%29" target="_blank"&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;)
&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href="http://www.heliotown.com/Ashcrafts_Fireball_Archive.html" target="_blank"&gt;Tom Ashcraft's camera&lt;/a&gt; in New Mexico.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24468/full/20090713_022753_001.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Cloudbait Observatory"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24468/pod/20090713_022753_001.jpg" alt="fireball" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Cloudbait Observatory&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The
image at left is from the Cloudbait camera. The meteor produced a long
trail, gradually brightening to about magnitude -10 (the Moon, seen at
the bottom, is about magnitude -11). Several small flares of light are
also seen along the path. The fireball lasted over 5.5 seconds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the camera data, I have determined that the
meteor began over south central Colorado, and descended to the
northeast, ending near northwest Colorado Springs. It reached its peak
brightness at a height of about 50 km (31 miles) near Cripple Creek. I
don't currently have sufficient camera data to determine the descent
angle.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fairly low altitude and low velocity (16 km/s) mean this
fireball might have produced meteorites. However, the brightness
profile is suggestive of a meteor which simply burned up.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image-small to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24469/full/20090713_lc.gif" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Cloudbait Observatory"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24469/pod/20090713_lc.gif" alt="chart" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Cloudbait Observatory&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
This chart shows the light curve of the fireball, peaking around mag -10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.php?id=46988&amp;amp;cat_id=1" target="_blank"&gt;Cyprus: Strange sighting of UFO near Paphos&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189881-Cyprus-Strange-sighting-of-UFO-near-Paphos#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Nathan Morley&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Cyprus Mail&lt;br /&gt;
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:42 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Four residents spotted a strange light zipping across the coast off
Paphos on Thursday night in the latest in a series of incidents of
unidentified objects in our skies.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UFO was clearly seen by John Knowles, a research specialist with Mutual UFO Network, he told the &lt;em&gt;Cyprus Mail&lt;/em&gt; the sighting took place near Coral Bay and is appealing for more witnesses.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was heading towards Paphos just off the coast, slow moving
and a very bright fireball, so there may very well have been other
witnesses."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We had been watching the crescent moon set in Coral Bay. In
the darkened skies, as we looked out to sea, an unknown object flying
in a north-south direction crossed the sky in front of us. Altitude was
about 300 feet, speed about 200 mph or less. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The object that appeared like a fireball, extremely
bright red-orange in colour, it maintained the same altitude as it
passed to the south in the direction of Paphos."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knowles added the object, which he saw at around 20.55pm on Thursday, finally vanished from the sky without trace.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His account was backed up by his next door neighbours, who also
witnessed the bizarre sight and rushed to the phone to alert him.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Annie Davidson of Tala said: "I was out walking my dog and I
saw a brilliant ball of light traveling very slowly close to the
coastline. It was clearly visible for a while and then disappeared. I
have never seen anything like it before."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Monday, several sightings of five bright red lights
hovering in the night sky near Cape Greco were observed. According to
witness accounts, the lights moved creating several different shapes
for around 8 minutes before disappearing.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some suggest that Chinese lanterns could to be the most likely
culprit, as they are often released into the skies at weddings and
parties.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently Cyprus has been flooded with UFO reports from all
parts of the island; last month a pilot approaching the illegal Tymbou
airport in the north reported being followed by what he described as a
"bright object which resembled a big man or a big garbage bag".
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UFO followed the aircraft until it landed and then disappeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/4511731.What_was_mysterious_fireball_in_the_night_sky_/" target="_blank"&gt;England: What was mysterious fireball in the night sky?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189889-England-What-was-mysterious-fireball-in-the-night-sky-#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Worcester News&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:41 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24546/full/fireball_over_england.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Unknown"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24546/medium/fireball_over_england.jpg" alt="Fireball over England" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Fireball: A photo of the mysterious fiery object. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Pictures taken by a Worcester family show what they claim is a "fireball" streaking across the Worcester night sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The object which had "orange flames coming from its top and sides" was spotted in Worcester at 10.15pm on Thursday.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob Giles, aged 59, was driving his daughter and niece home when he
looked up to see the bright object up above in the clear sky.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said: "It just came right over the top of us heading
towards the north east. I just stopped the car and got out. I was
telling my daughter to take a photo." &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Giles' 24-year-old daughter Sharon managed to snap
the fiery object, as did his niece Kate Skibinski, also of Holly Mount
Road, Tolladine.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was totally bizarre. I'm not sure what it was," said the 27-year-old.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It wasn't an aeroplane because they have flashing lights. It could have been a meteorite."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another twist, when Miss Skibinski phoned her father in
Bristol, he claimed a similar object had streaked across the city's sky
at about 10.30pm the same evening.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three, who were all sober at the time of the sighting, lost site of the 'fireball' in Warndon Villages.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Space expert Kevin Yates, space communications manager at the
Government's Earth Object Information Centre, in Leicester, said it was
likely the object was a meteorite.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"From past experience, these things can be no bigger than a
grain of sand and still give a good show. They're spectacular and
fascinating to watch," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said there had been no reports from the RAF radar net at Fylingdales about any large objects falling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://ufoinfo.com/sightings/canada/090630.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;Canada: Kingston, Ontario - Glow in the Sky Turns into an Hourglass-Shaped Fireball and Then into a Dimly-Lit Object&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189947-Canada-Kingston-Ontario-Glow-in-the-Sky-Turns-into-an-Hourglass-Shaped-Fireball-and-Then-into-a-Dimly-Lit-Object#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
John Hayes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UFOINFO&lt;br /&gt;
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:44 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 25, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date:&lt;/span&gt; June 30 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 12:00 midnight
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of witnesses:&lt;/span&gt; 2
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Number of objects:&lt;/span&gt; 1
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Shape of objects:&lt;/span&gt; Circular.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Weather Conditions:&lt;/span&gt; Clear Skies, great night. Maybe some clouds to the west. Moon low in the sky, crescent.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Description:&lt;/span&gt; Started out as a glow in the
distance towards the south. It looked like a plane head light coming
towards us, It got brighter and brighter so I asked my mate, look at
this what do you think, as we watched it turned into what looked like a
fireball the shape of an hour glass, then it went out and became a
dimly lit object in the sky. As I watched it looked as if the sun was
lighting up the object, sort of a vague outline. More grey then
glowing. As I watched I noticed a red light on what looked like one
edge of the object. If it had an edge it looked like the lower right
corner, as it did not resemble a circle at this time, more like a chunk
of something. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the light was very odd, as I continued to watch
the object moved over head from 10 o'clock position to the 11 o'clock
position I noticed that the light seemed to be moving. The object moved
to the 12 o'clock position about 15 seconds had elapsed since first
spotting it in the sky, as I watched the red light traveled around what
looked like a very large circle. No sound was heard what so ever. The
red light traveled counter clockwise around and around making a
complete circle about every 5 seconds. Just then I noticed that it
looked like on top of the object was a red glow, the bottom was
perfectly dark, other then the red light. As I noticed the faint red
pinkish glow at I what I consider the rear of the object a small object
caught my eye. It looked like an amber from a hot fire. It did a few
loops behind the object then disappeared from my sight.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also had the red pinkish glow, the object traveled off into
the distance and faded from view (North) it was not bright at all just
sort of a glow from the top and the red light. It took about 30 to 40
seconds for the whole event to take place. My mate said it had a
different shape then I stated but that's where its good to have 2
points of view.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope to get my mate to write in as well what she saw that
night. Keep watching you never know what you might see! I have never
seen anything like this in 35 years of sky watching, I am 45 now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2009/07/22/642995-Albefeuille-Largarde-Meteorite-J-ai-vu-une-lumiere-intense-et-furtive.html" target="_blank"&gt;Southwestern France: "I saw an intense flash of light"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/189994-Southwestern-France-I-saw-an-intense-flash-of-light-#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
P.Mz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
La Dépêche&lt;br /&gt;
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:06 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Yesterday, at 5.50 a.m. ... in Tarn-et-Garonne sky ... a bright trail of light.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Sauby of Albefeuille Largade is not a compulsive liar, Even if,
lately, people tend to look up at the sky, recalling the first steps of
Armstrong on the moon...and perhaps seeing things that are not there.
But we can trust the reports of Robert Sauby, who like other witnesses
from Southwestern France, alerted the media. According to Sauby: "it
was 5.50 a.m. I was driving towards Castelsarrasin. I was on the
Tourron slope when I noticed a fireball... Actually, it was a long
white trail preceding a very bright and intense white light. It lasted
two or three seconds"...
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The Perseids &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to scientists there is an explanation for this
phenomenon. At Jolimont Observatory in Toulouse, a member of the
astronomy society points out that we are about to enter the Perseids
period... also called the "night of shooting stars". This phenomenon is
the result of the entrance into the atmosphere of cometary debris that
crosses the Earth trajectory every summer in its orbit around the Sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Probably a Meteorite&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic du Midi Observatory astrophysicist, Joël Dolez, agrees, more or less: "it was probably a meteorite or chondrites".
&lt;br /&gt;
Chondrites are a kind of stone meteorite composed of at least 35%
metal. "This phenomenon, which occurs at a height of 20 or 30 km is
easily visible from the surface of the globe. You can observe such
phenomena every day. These space rocks usually disintegrate when
entering the atmosphere." It is unlikely therefore that any fragments
would be found on the ground. Concerning yesterday morning's sighting,
Mr. Dolez also suggests the less likely possibility that it was an
atmospheric phenomenon due to an electrically-charged fireball. Was it
a meteorite? Was it an atmospheric phenomenon? Whatever the case, the
witnesses were not dreaming yesterday morning; and, if in the coming
days you look to the skies, you should see many similar sights.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Translator's note: Tarn-et-Garonne, Castelsarrasin, Toulouse and Pic du Midi Observatory are located in Southwestern France.]
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-comment"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;According to the interviewed scientists, meteorites are very usual and almost fun though data shows that it is a &lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/151954-Meteorites-Asteroids-and-Comets-Damages-Disasters-Injuries-Deaths-and-Very-Close-Calls" target="_blank"&gt;growing and dangerous phenomenon&lt;/a&gt;... damage control?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong style="color: red;"&gt;Flashback:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href="http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn12532-jupiter-increases-risk-of-comet-strikes-on-earth.html" target="_blank"&gt;Jupiter increases risk of comet strike on Earth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/138904-Jupiter-increases-risk-of-comet-strike-on-Earth#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
David Shiga&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:47 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24586/full/ff.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Julian Baum"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24586/medium/ff.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Julian Baum&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;Earth experienced an especially heavy bombardment of asteroids and comets early in the solar system's history.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Contrary
to prevailing wisdom, Jupiter does not protect Earth from comet
strikes. In fact, Earth would suffer fewer impacts without the
influence of Jupiter's gravity, a new study says. It could have
implications for determining which solar systems are most hospitable to
life.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 1994 study showed that replacing Jupiter with a much smaller
planet like Uranus or Neptune would lead to 1000 times as many
long-period comets hitting Earth. This led to speculation that complex
life would have a hard time developing in solar systems without a
Jupiter-like planet because of more intense bombardment by comets.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a new study by Jonathan Horner and Barrie Jones of Open
University in Milton Keynes, UK, shows that if there were no planet at
all in Jupiter's orbit, Earth would actually be safer from impacts.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The contradictory results arise because Jupiter affects comets
in two different, competing ways. Its gravity helps pull comets into
the inner solar system, where they have a chance of hitting Earth, but
can also clear away Earth-threatening comets by ejecting them from the
solar system altogether, via a gravitational slingshot effect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Tripled impacts&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new study, the worst scenario for Earth is when
Jupiter is replaced by a planet with about the mass of Saturn. "[Such a
planet] is fairly capable of putting things into an Earth-crossing
orbit, but still has some difficulty ejecting them, so they will stay
on an Earth-crossing orbit for a much longer time," Horner told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;. The projected result was more than three times as many impacts as in the real solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So both the new study and the one from 1994 suggest that a smaller
planet in Jupiter's orbit would leave Earth worse off, although they
disagree about how much worse.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That may be because they differ on the source of the comets
they examine. Horner looked at objects coming from the Kuiper belt, a
region just beyond Neptune's orbit where many dormant comets reside.
The previous study, meanwhile, looked at the Oort cloud, a vast
collection of dormant comets extending hundreds of times further from
the Sun.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, knowing what kinds of solar systems are safest
from bombardment could help in the search for alien life. But, despite
the latest work, it is still unclear where we should be looking.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Asteroid threat&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alessandro Morbidelli of Nice Observatory in France, who
studies solar system dynamics, says neither Horner's analyis nor the
earlier study included the most important source of impacts - the
asteroid belt. About 95% of the impacts on Earth are due to asteroids,
he says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He suspects that a smaller planet in place of Jupiter may lead
to fewer asteroid impacts. "Given that near-Earth asteroids dominate
the impact rate, decreasing asteroid impacts might cause a decrease in
the overall bombardment rate of the Earth," he told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Horner and Jones plan to extend their study to include asteroids, but
Morbidelli says there are even more factors to examine. "You can
imagine solar systems where a much more massive and broader asteroid
belt is preserved - it would be difficult to live in that solar
system," he says. "You can imagine giant planets migrating and
destroying an asteroid belt. There are so many factors it is difficult
to handle them all."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results were presented Friday at the European Planetary Science Congress 2007 in Potsdam, Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/weekinreview/26overbye.html" target="_blank"&gt;Jupiter - Our Cosmic Protector? No!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190017-Jupiter-Our-Cosmic-Protector-No-#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Dennis Overbye&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The New York Times&lt;br /&gt;
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:49 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Jupiter took a bullet for us last weekend.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An object, probably &lt;strong&gt;a comet that nobody saw coming&lt;/strong&gt;,
plowed into the giant planet's colorful cloud tops sometime Sunday,
splashing up debris and leaving a black eye the size of the Pacific
Ocean. This was the second time in 15 years that this had happened. The
whole world was watching when Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 fell apart and its
pieces crashed into Jupiter in 1994, leaving Earth-size marks that
persisted up to a year.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's Jupiter doing its cosmic job, astronomers like to say.
Better it than us. Part of what makes the Earth such a nice place to
live, the story goes, is that Jupiter's overbearing gravity acts as a
gravitational shield deflecting incoming space junk, mainly comets,
away from the inner solar system where it could do for us what an
asteroid apparently did for the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Indeed,
astronomers look for similar configurations - a giant outer planet with
room for smaller planets in closer to the home stars - in other
planetary systems as an indication of their hospitableness to life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anthony Wesley, the Australian amateur astronomer who
first noticed the mark on Jupiter and sounded the alarm on Sunday, paid
homage to that notion when he told &lt;em&gt;The Sydney Morning Herald&lt;/em&gt;,
"If anything like that had hit the Earth it would have been curtains
for us, so we can feel very happy that Jupiter is doing its
vacuum-cleaner job and hoovering up all these large pieces before they
come for us."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;But is this warm and fuzzy image of the King of Planets as father-protector really true?&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"&lt;strong&gt;I really question this idea&lt;/strong&gt;," said Brian G.
Marsden of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, referring
to Jupiter as our guardian planet. As the former director of the
International Astronomical Union's Central Bureau for Astronomical
Telegrams, he has spent his career keeping track of wayward objects,
particularly comets, in the solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Jupiter is just as much a menace as a savior, he said. The big
planet throws a lot of comets out of the solar system, but it also
throws them in&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Take, for example, Comet Lexell, named after the Swedish astronomer
Anders Lexell. In 1770 it whizzed only a million miles from the Earth,
missing us by a cosmic whisker, Dr. Marsden said. That comet had come
streaking in from the outer solar system three years earlier and passed
close to Jupiter, which diverted it into a new orbit and straight
toward Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comet made two passes around the Sun and in 1779 again
passed very close to Jupiter, which then threw it back out of the solar
system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It was as if Jupiter aimed at us and missed," said Dr.
Marsden, who complained that the comet would never have come anywhere
near the Earth if Jupiter hadn't thrown it at us in the first place.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hal Levison, an astronomer at the Southwest Research
Institute, in Boulder, Colo., who studies the evolution of the solar
system, said that whether Jupiter was menace or protector depended on
where the comets came from. Lexell, like Shoemaker Levy 9 and probably
the truck that just hit Jupiter, most likely came from an icy zone of
debris known as the Kuiper Belt, which lies just outside the orbit of
Neptune, he explained. Jupiter probably does increase our exposure to
those comets, he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;But Jupiter helps protect us, he said, from an even more dangerous band of comets coming from the so-called Oort Cloud&lt;/strong&gt;,
a vast spherical deep-freeze surrounding the solar system as far as a
light-year from the Sun. Every once in a while, in response to
gravitational nudges from a passing star or gas cloud, a comet is
unleashed from storage and comes crashing inward.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jupiter's benign influence here comes in two forms. The cloud
was initially populated in the early days of the solar system by the
gravity of Uranus and Neptune sweeping up debris and flinging it
outward, but Jupiter and Saturn are so strong, Dr. Levison said, that,
first of all, they threw a lot of the junk out of the solar system
altogether, lessening the size of this cosmic arsenal. Second, Jupiter
deflects some of the comets that get dislodged and fall back in, Dr.
Levison said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's a double anti-whammy," he said.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asteroids pose the greatest danger of all to Earth, however,
astronomers say, and here Jupiter's influence is hardly assuring.
Mostly asteroids live peacefully in the asteroid belt between Mars and
Jupiter, whose gravity, so the standard story goes, keeps them too
stirred to coalesce into a planet but can cause them to collide and
rebound in the direction of Earth.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what happened, Greg Laughlin of the University of
California at Santa Cruz, said, to a chunk of iron and nickel about 50
yards across roughly 10 million to 100 million years ago. The result is
a hole in the desert almost a mile wide and 500 feet deep in northern
Arizona, called Barringer Crater. A gift, perhaps, from our friend and
lord, Jupiter. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;Regarding
the claim that Jupiter "protects us from an even more dangerous band of
comets coming from the so-called Oort Cloud", let's see what Clube and
Napier, British astronomers and writers of &lt;em&gt;The Cosmic Serpent&lt;/em&gt;,  have to &lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/147246-Clube-and-Napier-Coherent-Catastrophism" target="_blank"&gt;say&lt;/a&gt;:
The giant comets normally reside far beyond the planets, in a spherical
cloud surrounding the Sun, called the Oort cloud. There is also
evidence for a flattened disk of comets closer to the inner solar
system, called the Edgeworth/Kuiper belt. What prompts members of
either of these comet repositories to enter the realm of the planets? &lt;strong&gt;Clube
and Napier suggest a galactic influence. The solar system periodically
passes through the plane of the galaxy as the Sun (and the solar system
with it) orbits the galactic center. Each passage may dislodge giant
comets and divert them closer to the Sun. The outer planets,
particularly Jupiter, may then perturb some of these giant comets into
orbits which enter the inner solar system. These comets, stressed both
by gravity and by heat from the sun, may fragment into a cloud of
smaller objects with dynamically similar orbits&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chiron offers a good example of a giant comet as called for by Clube
and Napier's giant comet hypothesis. Chiron is somewhere between 148
and 208 kilometers in diameter. Currently Chiron's unstable "parking
orbit" lies mostly between Saturn and Uranus. Chiron may end up
injected into the inner solar system within a hundred thousand years,
or ejected from the solar system on a similar time scale. It is also
possible that Chiron has already visited the inner solar system.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Taurid complex and the Kreutz sungrazer group are two
families of objects which most likely represent the fragmented remains
of two giant comets in the current era. SOHO has recently discovered
many new members of the Kreutz group which were previously unknown.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Kreutz progenitor was injected into a retrograde orbit and
attained the sungrazing state at a high inclination to the ecliptic.
Hence the debris of its "children" does not pose a threat to the Earth.
The Taurid progenitor on the other hand ended up in a short-period
low-inclination prograde orbit. This is why the Earth can encounter its
debris with potentially calamitous results.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would happen should the Earth pass through the orbit of a
disintegrating giant comet just before or after the comet passes that
same point? Since larger fragments tend to cluster close to the nucleus
of the comet, chances would increase that the Earth would be bombarded
by these larger fragments. The severity of this comet fragment shower
would far exceed any ordinary meteor shower. Not only would "shooting
stars" and bright fireballs caused by small debris appear, but so too
would large airbursts and possibly ground impacts. These would result
in significant destruction should they occur over an inhabited area. If
a large enough fragment struck in the ocean -- say, 200 meters or so in
diameter -- it would raise tsunamis even at a great distance that would
sweep away coastal habitations.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duncan Steel, a colleague of Clube and Napier, refers to this process as coherent catastrophism. &lt;strong&gt;Widespread
destruction derives from the coherent arrival of many impactors within
a few days, as opposed to the sporadic arrival of objects spread
randomly in space. The shower repeats for a period of years until the
cometary orbit precesses so that the Earth no longer encounters the
dense part of the debris field.&lt;/strong&gt; (Of course, sporadic debris unrelated to the disintegrating comet may impact at any time as well.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://inexplicata.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Mexico: The Xochitepec Fireball - UFO or Meteorite?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190096-Mexico-The-Xochitepec-Fireball-UFO-or-Meteorite-#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Inexplicata&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:23 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24649/full/xochitepec.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Unknown"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24649/medium/xochitepec.jpg" alt="Mexico ufo" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Unknown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date:&lt;/span&gt; July 26, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Residents of Xochitepec were treated to the sight of a "ball of fire"
over Avenida Aeropuerto in the Miguel Hidalgo section of town. The
witnesses fixed their eyes on a brilliant object in the sky for five
minutes, before the sighting ended in a lightning-like flash and
disappeared.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unidentified object's presence drew the attention of many:
some took out their camcorders, others photographed the "ball of fire"
that seemed to fall very slowly from the heavens under clear skies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some claimed having heard a buzzing sound, stating
unequivocally that it was not an airplane or anything known.
Furthermore, its descent was slow and perpendicular. Several minutes
into the sighting, people were shocked to see the object fire a bright
light, resembling a beam or a bolt of lightning.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After this, the object commenced its slow ascent until it vanished from sight.
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever it was, it certainly captivated the locals. Some were
astonished and others frightened; there were even those who spoke of
the object as "an ill omen" signaling the arrival of plagues and
diseases. They do not think that it was a meteorite, as these fall in
seconds and are high in the sky -- but this object was at the same
height as the clouds, of which there were none at the time.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spectacle took place at 22:15 hours on Thursday, July 23
2009. The photos taken by a local resident were forwarded to this
newsroom and are published here for everyone to draw their own
conclusions.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Note from Prof. Ana Luisa Cid:&lt;/span&gt; According
to eyewitness accounts, the alleged UFO fired a sort of beam, a
situation that has been documented in other sightings, such as the
Gabriel Hernandez case in Mexico City and the Bocovna UFO sighting in
Chihuahua.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: El Sol de Cuernavaca&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;			&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/28/mystery-crash-in-ott.html" target="_blank"&gt;Canada: Mystery crash in Ottawa River?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;em&gt;				&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190122-Canada-Mystery-crash-in-Ottawa-River-#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;David Pescovitz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;					BoingBoing.net&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:31 UTC
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;			&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
Last night, dozens of witnesses reported seeing lights and hearing an
explosion as something crashed into the Ottawa River. Search-and-rescue
crews from Ottawa and Gatineau showed up but so far, haven't found
anything. Was it an airplane? According to the &lt;em&gt;Ottawa Citizen&lt;/em&gt; newspaper, no planes are missing. Maybe it was a meteorite?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the &lt;a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/life/Search+resumes+small+plane+feared+crashed+river/1834649/story.html" target="_blank"&gt;Ottawa Citizen&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Dr. Dirk Keenan was sailing with some friends out of the Nepean Yacht
Club when they saw the light of what looked like a small aircraft to
the east, close to the Quebec shore.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"I noticed the light coming down. It was like a headlight,
very bright," Keenan said Tuesday morning. "It descended very rapidly,
levelled off, then disappeared."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keenan, a student pilot himself, thought it looked like the
pilot had lost control and gone into a dive, then briefly recovered
before going down. Keenan steered his boat toward the position, but
didn't dare get too close to the rapids in the dark.&lt;strong&gt; The lights appeared to vanish into the river or into the forest on the Quebec side&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/07/long-eaton-nottingham-25th26th-july-2009/" target="_blank"&gt;England: Long Eaton, Nottingham - Multiple 'Fireballs' seen over 40 minute period&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190203-England-Long-Eaton-Nottingham-Multiple-Fireballs-seen-over-40-minute-period#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
UK UFO Sighting Reports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:35 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 28, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; Saturday/Sunday 25th/26th July 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 11.50pm-1.10am
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Witness Statement:&lt;/span&gt; Saturday/Sunday 25th/26th July
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a night out we arrived back in Long Eaton &amp;amp; dropped my
daughter at her house at about 11.50pm. She signaled to us to get out
of the car and my wife &amp;amp; I looked to where she was pointing and saw
about 4, what can only be described as fireballs traveling at a lowish
altitude in a north easterly direction. They were followed by another
2. We watched them disappear from view and went to our house a couple
of streets away. On the journey we saw at least 2 more of the objects.
On arriving home, we got out our binoculars and after a time at about
12.15 another one came past over head. Then about 12.30 the final one?
(We watched for about another 40 minutes but saw no others.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although there was a certain amount of breeze, the
objects were flying faster than that. I don't know how big Chinese
lanterns are, but these must have been the size of a hot air balloon
and surely being aflame as they appeared to be, would have burned
themselves out in a short space of time. There must have been lots of
people who witnessed this, and although we are in close proximity to EM
airport, I do not think it was aeroplanes or other normal flying craft.
I would like to here what others make of it. In my excitement I never
thought to use my mobile phone to capture the images. Sorry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17520-comets-not-asteroids-to-blame-for-moons-scarred-face.html" target="_blank"&gt;Comets, Not Asteroids, to Blame for Moon's Scarred Face&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190053-Comets-Not-Asteroids-to-Blame-for-Moon-s-Scarred-Face#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Hazel Muir&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:29 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24623/full/dn17520_2_300.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© NASA"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24623/medium/dn17520_2_300.jpg" alt="Moon" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;A new study suggests comets gouged out the vast majority of craters on the moon.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Icy
comets - not rocky asteroids - launched a dramatic assault on the Earth
and moon around 3.85 billion years ago, a new study of ancient rocks in
Greenland suggests. The work suggests much of Earth's water could have
been brought to the planet by comets.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We can see craters on the moon's surface with the naked eye,
but nobody actually knew what caused them - was it rocks, was it iron,
was it ice?" says Uffe Gråe Jørgensen, an astronomer at the Niels Bohr
Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. "It's exciting to find signs that it
was actually ice."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence suggests that the Earth and moon had both formed
around 4.5 billion years ago. But almost all the craters on the moon
date to a later period, the "Late Heavy Bombardment" 3.8 to 3.9 billion
years ago, when around 100 million billion tonnes of rock or ice
crashed onto the lunar surface. The Earth would have been pummelled by
debris at the same time, although plate tectonics on our restless
planet have since erased the scars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To find out whether asteroids or comets were the main
culprits for the bombardment, Jørgensen decided to measure levels of
the element iridium in ancient terrestrial rocks. Iridium is rare on
the Earth's surface because almost all of it bound to iron and sank
into the Earth's core soon after the planet had formed. But iridium is
relatively common in comets and meteorites.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Rock or ice&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His team calculated the amount of iridium that asteroids would
leave on the Earth and moon compared to comets. Because comets have
more volatile elements and higher impact speeds due to their more
elongated orbits around the sun, they would create giant plumes on
impact, allowing more iridium to escape into space than during asteroid
impacts.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The team predicted that asteroid bombardment would leave
iridium levels of 18,000 and 10,000 parts per trillion in rocks on the
Earth and moon respectively, while the same figures for comet
bombardment would be about 130 and 10.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ancient moon rocks returned by NASA's Apollo missions have
already confirmed that the lunar iridium levels are 10 parts per
trillion or less. To find out the terrestrial value, Jørgensen's team
sampled some of the world's oldest rocks from Greenland, aged 3.8
billion years, and asked a Japanese laboratory to assess their iridium
levels more accurately than ever before. They contained iridium levels
of 150 parts per trillion.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;That strongly suggests comets, rather than asteroids, caused the violent bombardment.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Giant plumes&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, Jørgensen's team calculates that around 3400 tonnes of
icy comet material fell on each square metre of the Earth. About half
the comet material would ricochet back into space in giant plumes,
leaving behind roughly a billion cubic kilometres of cometary water in
total.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is a similar amount to that in the Earth's oceans today,
although it is not clear whether there was already water on the planet
due to chemical reactions on the early Earth (see &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12693-earths-water-brewed-at-home-not-in-space.html" target="_blank"&gt;Earth's water brewed at home, not in space&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Michael Mumma, a comet expert at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in
Maryland who was not involved in the research, says the new report is
interesting: "The paper is certain to stimulate lively debate."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journal reference: &lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.015" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Icarus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17534-mysterious-bright-spot-found-on-venus.html" target="_blank"&gt;Mysterious bright spot found on Venus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190288-Mysterious-bright-spot-found-on-Venus#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Rachel Courtland&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
New Scientist&lt;br /&gt;
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-right"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24756/full/ff.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© Melillo/Maxson/ESA/University of Wisconsin-Madison/ALPO"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24756/medium/ff.jpg" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© Melillo/Maxson/ESA/University of Wisconsin-Madison/ALPO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="caption"&gt;A new, bright spot in the clouds of Venus was found by amateur astronomer Frank Melillo on 19 July&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
A
strange spot emerged on Venus last week, and astronomers are not sure
what caused it. They hope future observations will reveal whether
volcanic activity, turbulence in the planet's atmosphere, or charged
particles from the sun are to blame.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amateur astronomer Frank Melillo of Holtsville, New York,
first spotted the new feature, which is brighter than its surroundings
at ultraviolet wavelengths, on the planet's southern hemisphere on 19
July. That same day, an amateur observer in Australia found a dark spot
on Jupiter that had been caused by a meteoroid impact.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venus spot was confirmed by other observers, and images
from Europe's Venus Express, the only spacecraft in orbit around the
planet, later revealed that the spot had appeared at least four days
before Melillo saw it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observations show that the spot had already spread out
somewhat by the end of last week, and astronomers are awaiting more
recent observations from Venus Express.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spot is bright at ultraviolet wavelengths, which may argue
against a meteoroid impact as a cause. That's because rocky bodies,
with the exception of objects very rich in water ice, should cause an
impact site to darken at ultraviolet wavelengths as it fills with
debris that absorbs such light, says Sanjay Limaye of the University of
Wisconsin-Madison and a member of the Venus Express team. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Powerful eruption?&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another possibility is that a gust of charged particles from the sun
could have created the glow by energising a patch of the upper
atmosphere. Alternatively, waves in the atmosphere, which trigger
turbulence and are thought to carry material up and down, could have
concentrated bright material to create the spot.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A volcanic eruption is another suspect. Venus boasts the most
volcanoes of any planet in the solar system, and nearly 90% of its
surface is covered by basaltic lava flows, although no 'smoking gun'
has yet been found for current volcanic activity. But an eruption would
have had to be very powerful to punch through a dense layer in Venus's
atmosphere to create the spot some 65 to 70 kilometres above the
planet's surface.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"It's fair to say something unusual happened on Venus. Unfortunately, we don't know what happened," Limaye told &lt;em&gt;New Scientist&lt;/em&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Volcanic gases&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two spectrometers on board Venus Express might help reveal the
culprit. One directly measures the spectrum of light emanating from the
planet, while the other can measure trace constituents in the
atmosphere by measuring how gases there absorb sunlight.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These instruments could reveal changes in the size
distribution of particles in the atmosphere and higher concentrations
of molecules, such as sulphur dioxide, that could suggest a volcanic
eruption.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a volcano is to blame, proving it will be difficult. Even
if Venus Express finds higher-than-average levels of sulphur dioxide in
the atmosphere, the observation could be explained by non-volcanic
processes, cautions Limaye. Sunlight can break down sulphuric acid in
Venus's clouds to create sulphur dioxide, which may not be evenly
circulated in the planet's atmosphere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Mystery world&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not the first time astronomers have spotted bright
features in Venus's atmosphere. Bright spots have been seen from Earth
for decades, although they have not been clearly explained, Limaye
says.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most recent dramatic brightening occurred in January 2007,
when areas in both the northern and southern hemispheres of the planet
brightened. Because it is localised in a spot, this new feature looks
different, but it is equally mysterious.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"This shows how much we don't know about Venus," Limaye says.
In some ways, Venus is a simpler planet than Earth - it has no oceans
and because of its nearly vertical spin axis, practically no seasons,
he adds. But planetary scientists still do not understand what causes
the planet's atmosphere to rotate 60 times faster than the planet
itself. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-body --&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Comment: &lt;/strong&gt;These are possibilities, of course. One may want to consider this as well: &lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/186499-Military-Hush-Up-Incoming-Space-Rocks-Now-Classified" target="_blank"&gt;Military Hush-Up: Incoming Space Rocks Now Classified&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/14"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="article odd"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://timesonline.typepad.com/science/2009/07/jupiters-cosmic-smash-what-does-it-mean-for-earth.html" target="_blank"&gt;Jupiter's cosmic smash: what does it mean for Earth?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190295-Jupiter-s-cosmic-smash-what-does-it-mean-for-Earth-#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Times Online&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:33 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-image to-left"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24737/full/a_large_impact_on_Jupiter_001.jpg" rel="ibox&amp;amp;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© NASA"&gt;&lt;img style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px;" src="https://www.sott.net/image/image/s1/24737/medium/a_large_impact_on_Jupiter_001.jpg" alt="Jupiter" title="Click to enlarge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="image-caption"&gt;&lt;span class="tiny"&gt;© NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The Apollo 11 moon landing is not the only significant space anniversary that falls this week. It is also 15 years since &lt;a href="http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/sl9/"&gt;fragments&lt;/a&gt; of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Shoemaker-Levy_9"&gt;smashed&lt;/a&gt; into Jupiter, in July 1994, giving astronomers a first-hand look at the devastation that follows such cosmic collisions.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With uncanny timing, a similar impact event seems to have happened again. On Sunday, an amateur astronomer named &lt;a href="http://jupiter.samba.org/jupiter-impact.html"&gt;Anthony Wesley&lt;/a&gt; observed a strange black &lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6721504.ece"&gt;blob&lt;/a&gt; on the surface of Jupiter. When he alerted Nasa professionals, they &lt;a href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2009-112"&gt;confirmed&lt;/a&gt;  that it indeed appears to have been caused by another impact event.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resulting debris cloud has been reported as covering an area with roughly the same diameter as the &lt;a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/189567-Jupiter-sports-new-bruise-from-impact"&gt;Earth&lt;/a&gt;.
Astronomers have told me today that the likely cause is the impact of a
comet, or comet fragment, between 500m and 2km in diameter. It all
raises a potentially terrifying question. What might have happened had
such an object struck not Jupiter, but the Earth? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The good news is that the devastation would not have
been quite as bad as it seems to have been on Jupiter. The mass of the
gas giant is so much greater than that of the Earth, that when objects
collide with it they do so at much faster speeds, releasing much more
energy. So even though Jupiter is sporting an Earth-sized bruise, that
doesn't mean that a similar impact would engulf the Earth entirely in
debris.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's also the case that such impact events are probably a lot
more common on Jupiter than they are in our neck of the planetary
woods. For a start, Jupiter is a much bigger target. And secondly, as
Matthew Genge, of Imperial College, London, put it to me today, its
vast gravity means it often;"soaks up" comets approaching the inner
solar system from the Kuiper belt. This phenomenon, indeed, may
actually have helped to make the Earth a more hospitable place for life
-- though any benefits are double-edged, as Jupiter's gravity can also
perturb the orbits of asteroids and fling them our way.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;That, though, is where the good news ends.&lt;/strong&gt; According to the UK's Near-Earth Object Taskforce &lt;a href="http://www.spacecentre.co.uk/neo/report.html"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt;,
asteroids 700m in diameter strike the Earth every 10,000 to 100,000
years, and would devastate an area the size of Virginia if they hit
land. An ocean impact would cause a hemisphere-wide tsunami. Objects on
the 1km to 2km scale would cause wider destruction, and also affect the
climate through a "nuclear winter" effect. Still larger objects could
cause a mass extinction -- as did the 10km-plus object that landed at &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater"&gt;Chicxulub&lt;/a&gt;,
now in Mexico, 65 million years ago. Though some scientists dispute it,
the prevailing consensus is that it's no coincidence that that's also
the date for the Cretaceous-Tertiary &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous%E2%80%93Tertiary_extinction_event"&gt;mass extinction&lt;/a&gt;, and the demise of the dinosaurs.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want an idea of the effects any given asteroid or comet might have, the University of Arizona has an online calculator &lt;a href="http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Just fill in your parameters and go.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Jupiter impact should make it perfectly clear that, for all the fun
that's been poked at Lembit Opik when he's raised the issue, near-Earth
object defence is not a laughing matter. It's something the world needs
to take extremely seriously -- as &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jul/21/jupiter-asteroid-lembit-opik"&gt;Opik says again today&lt;/a&gt;.
We need to think creatively about how we might divert an asteroid or
comet that is found to be on collision course with Earth. Simply
blowing it up, as Bruce Willis and Co. did in &lt;a href="http://www.movie-page.com/1998/armageddon.htm"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Armageddon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
will probably be the worst solution of all, creating a shower of
fragments that would pepper us like Shoemaker-Levy 9 bombarded Jupiter.
But there are other options worth trying, such as nudging it away from
us with rockets, or even painting it to change its albedo, and hence
its speed.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technical fixes, however, will be only one element of a
workable planetary defence plan. Professor Richard Crowther, who chairs
the UN's working group on near-Earth objects, made an interesting point
about this when I spoke to him this afternoon. If an asteroid is on
collision course with, say, the UK, then nudging it away from Earth
will first involve nudging it onto a collision course with other
countries -- who might not like that prospect. We're going to need
international agreement on the steps we would have to take to protect
ourselves, as well as the technology to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class="article-header"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-title"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uk-ufo.co.uk/2009/07/the-glen-palacefields-runcorn-30th-july-2009/" target="_blank"&gt;England: Runcorn - Several Massive White Flashes in Sky with No Thunder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="article-info"&gt;
&lt;div class="article-icon-bar"&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.sott.net/articles/show/190310-England-Runcorn-Several-Massive-White-Flashes-in-Sky-with-No-Thunder#" onclick="window.print(); return false;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
UK UFO Sighting Reports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:08 UTC
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-info --&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!-- end article-header --&gt;
&lt;div class="article-body"&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Posted:&lt;/span&gt; July 30, 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Location of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; The Glen Palacefields Runcorn
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Date of Sighting:&lt;/span&gt; 30th July 2009
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Time:&lt;/span&gt; 12.00am
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="BoldGrey"&gt;Witness Statement:&lt;/span&gt; 12:00AM 30th July 09.
Left my house in the Glen Palacefields Runcorn with a friend to drop
him off when entering my car a MASSIVE white flash lit up the sky and
the carpark, looked like a powerful camera flash but NO NOISE. Both me
and my friend commented as thinking someone was in the close or the
police helicopter was overhead. When driving on the expressway again a
massive flash over the Hallwood estate to my right above again no noise
when only being about 500 yrds away from where it looked like it
originated in the estate or above. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Took left exit for Castlefields then again Large flash
but over Halton Brook estate to my left just over the tree's coming
down the slipway to the bottom of Boston Avenue. Both commented no
noise at any point and little to no cloud cover with large breaks and
able to see starlight in between. When dropped of friend at lower
Castlefields on Warrington road joked that he would be